“Mr. Big” ruse needs reforming, says crim grad
Kouri Keenan, 604.505.0027 (currently in Fredericton but can be reached at this number); kkeenan@sfu.ca
Stuart Colcleugh, PAMR, 778.782.3219
Updated: October 8, 2009
Kouri Keenan had no opinion either way when he began his master’s thesis on “Mr. Big”, an undercover police technique in which officers masquerade as criminals to trick suspects into confessing crimes to a fake mob boss.
“I originally set out just to look at the nature and scope of the technique,” says the Fredericton, N.B., SFU criminology student.
But after analyzing 63 Canadian criminal cases involving Mr. Big confessions, Keenan says he now has serious misgivings about the controversial but increasingly common subterfuge, which is admissible in Canada but not the U.S. or U.K.
In Mr. Big stings, police “gangsters” ply their targets with liquor, money and gifts, frighten them with choreographed beatings, kidnappings and murders and extract their confessions using intimidation, psychological manipulation, threats and promises of wealth and protection.
But the confessions “are inherently unreliable because they’re being made to undercover police officers who portray themselves as members of a sophisticated and wealthy criminal syndicate,” says Keenan.
In addition, “these role-playing scenarios undermine many of the fundamental principles of justice and exceed professional, ethical and even moral boundaries.”
And they are expensive. The RCMP claim Mr. Big operations cost anywhere from $100,000 to $300,000, but Keenan found several that exceeded $2 million.
Keenan’s thesis, which he’s adapting into a book, recommends numerous legal reforms to prevent abuses and false confessions within Mr. Big scenarios.
But he says neither the courts nor politicians appear interested in reforming the practice, due its overwhelming success in snaring legitimate murderers and other felons.
“What’s going to have to happen,” he says, “is a wrongful conviction directly attributable to a Mr. Big operation.”
And that could come soon, with the case of Kyle Wayne Unger, who spent 14 years in jail after being convicted in the brutal 1990 murder of a Manitoba teen, largely as the result of a Mr. Big confession. Unger was released last March after DNA cast doubt on his guilt and federal Justice Minister Rob Nicholson is reviewing his case.
“It’s likely the verdict will be overturned,” says Keenan, “which will have serious ramifications for all Mr. Big cases where only a confession led to a guilty conviction.”
Keenan hopes to pursue a PhD in criminology at SFU next year.
Corinne Ropp
I think that the Mr Big Sting Operations needs to be addressed. As a family where the Sting operation was used with my brother being convicted I know first hand what the RCMP are able to do. If there is physical evidence that backs up the confession, a case can be made. When the only physical evidence is the "Confession" it cannot be admissable. That is the danger and the RCMP nor the prosecutors care whether that is the case or not.People are in jail as a result of this that are innocent.My brothers case cost much more than half a million dollars.It is my hope that this type of police work is looked at more seriously.