Jesse Proudfoot

Scholarships and awards

Jesse Proudfoot Receives PhD and Dean's Convocation Medal

June 13, 2012
Print

Dr. Jesse Proudfoot's groundbreaking ethnographic research focused on drug-addicted panhandlers in the Downtown Eastside neighborhood of Vancouver. This area — known as the "poorest postal code" in Canada — has a significant concentration of IV drug-users.

His research examined pioneering harm reduction initiatives such as North America's first supervised injection site, Insite, as well as methadone maintenance programs. The research assessed the effects of these programs on the lives of poverty stricken, drug-addicted individuals, and examined the political controversy over progressive drug policy.

As testament to the quality of his research, Dr. Proudfoot has several publications, including two first author journal publications and a book chapter.

Dr. Proudfoot's doctoral research was funded by a prestigious SSHRC Canada Graduate Scholarship and he was recently awarded a SSHRC Post Doctoral Fellowship.

Dr. Proudfoot is currently pursuing a postdoctoral Fellowship at DePaul University, Chicago. His research examines Chicago's harm reduction initiatives to see how the different social and political geographies of the two cities of Vancouver and Chicago affect drug policy, service provision, and the quality of life of drug users.

On behalf of SFU, we congratulate Dr. Proudfoot on his outstanding achievements, which are being recognized by the award of the Dean of Graduate Studies Convocation Medal as SFU's most outstanding graduate student from the Faculty of the Environment.

Dr. Jesse Proudfoot accepts his medal
*
No comments yet

Search the Graduate Studies website

Print

Defences and Events

  • Brian Uher-Koch, MSc Thesis Defence, Biological Sciences
    2:00 PM - 4:00 PM
    May 21, 2013
    Supervisor Dr. Ronald Ydenberg Thesis Title: Latitudinal and seasonal variation in non-breeding survival of surf and white-winged scoters
  • Joshua Newman, PhD Thesis Defence, Political Science
    5:00 PM - 8:00 PM
    May 22, 2013
    Location: SFU Harbour Centre, The Repap Policy Room (1425) Title: The Governance of Public-Private Partnerships: Success and Failure in the Transportation Sector Abstract Since the economic crises of the 1970s, the political climate in many developed countries has been reoriented from a focus on the public provision of goods and services to an emphasis on curbing government spending, reducing taxes, and limiting bureaucracy. As a consequence, alternative service delivery arrangements, in which non-government entities and private sector corporations are involved in public service delivery, have become increasingly popular in the last 30 years. The term “governance” is now commonly used to signify this shift away from a traditional hierarchical mode of government to a more horizontal environment of policy formulation and implementation. For many supporters of alternative service delivery, increased freedom for the private sector is regarded as the key to successful governance. Public-private partnerships (P3s) are a family of alternative service delivery mechanisms that allow the private sector to finance, own, and deliver goods and services to the public through long-term contractual arrangements with governments and other public sector agencies. P3s fit comfortably into the logic of alternative service delivery, which implies that by removing some – but not all – elements of the public sector and replacing them with some – but not all – aspects of the private sector, a balance between public sector accountability and private sector efficiency can be struck. However, this presents an inherent conflict, as the public sector is viewed simultaneously as the problem and as the solution to improving public service delivery. This inherent conflict in governance arrangements can sometimes lead to governance failure, a phenomenon that is not sufficiently understood. First, I show that governance failure can have negative consequences for the state and society. Then, I examine two case studies in P3 delivery of transportation infrastructure, the Canada Line in Vancouver, Canada and the Sydney Airport Link in Sydney, Australia, to determine how governance failure occurs and how it can be avoided. These two cases have similar technical parameters and political motivations, but in the Canadian case, where the public sector demonstrated policy leadership through the fostering of policy networks, through bounded-rational policy learning, and through a collaborative institutional approach to project implementation, successful governance was achieved. By contrast, the Australian case, in which the government was not substantially engaged in the partnership, resulted in governance failure. From an analysis of these two cases I conclude that public sector policy leadership is essential to the prevention of governance failure.
  • Adhi Susilo PhD Education Thesis Examination
    10:00 AM - 1:00 PM
    May 30, 2013
    No Description
  • Download .ics