Perspectives on Global Nutrition -  by Allan Davison

Why this website? I was contemplating retirement when, out of the blue, an invitation came to write curriculum & courses for an MSc in Global Health to produce "Agents of Change". Born in sub-Saharan Africa, the most impacted, most disastrous scene of poverty and hunger, how could I resist?
Instructor credentials - including my CV

When I began, resources were abundant, except:

1) The field of global nutrition is riddled with misinformation which has undermined much of the effort so far. Good decisions require good data
2) D
elivery of aid was mired in controversy. Insufficient evidence to overcome ideological bias
3) There is a gap between what nutritionists in rich counties learn and what's needed in the field. Currently nutritionists and nutritional info are not optimally utilized

It is a matter for optimism that the Cochrane Collaboration, well known for unbiased, comprehensive, evidence based assessment of medical claims, is bringing its methodology and reputation to bear on both Evidence-based aid; & reshaping evidence synthesis for nutritional policy - also a Nutrition Field located in Africa to coordinate methods for conducting reviews in nutrition.

While researching global nutrition, I was asked to write 2 book chapters. In these 


At this point I invite the reader to take a diversion that my students find useful.

1) You could check your present knowledge regarding widespread misconceptions in global health and nutrition, by taking a 5-minute T/F quiz. It consists of 19 commonly believed assertions almost all of which are false. My intent is to create skepticism, and a demand for the information that will be provided in the resources of this website.

2) This 5-minute video clip is a presentation by Swedish epidemiologist Hans Rosling to the 2015 Global Economic summit economists and heads of state. He asks three questions to show the extent which these leaders hold disastrous misconception regarding current trends in global health and nutrition. Rosling underlines that it is not the fact that they didn't know the answer that is reprehensible. It is that they were very confident of something that was false. Good decisions, require good evidence.



To continue on the web, choose one of the following

Understand more about nutritional inequities
- a one page overview of information and issues

Instructional slides for global health (these are being re-edited but are available as a resource
1) A 4 hour module - problems, causes, & strategies adopted: 3 slide sets
2) A set of 3 full web courses was completed for the Global Health Education Consortium

3) Half-a-dozen 
short videos that give perspective - the words of some who've
     contributed to making a difference
4) Conference presentations - most with slide sets
=================





WebMaster adavison@sfu.ca (please report problems)



 Copyright info