Fall 2018 - ENGL 447W D100

Topics in American Literature before 1900 (4)

Class Number: 6927

Delivery Method: In Person

Overview

  • Course Times + Location:

    Sep 4 – Dec 3, 2018: Tue, Thu, 10:30 a.m.–12:20 p.m.
    Burnaby

  • Prerequisites:

    Two 300 division English courses. Strongly recommended: ENGL 347. Reserved for English honors, major, joint major and minor students.

Description

CALENDAR DESCRIPTION:

The intensive study of selected works of American literature written before 1900. May be organized by author, genre, or critical approach. Students with credit for ENGL 447 may not take this course for further credit. Writing.

COURSE DETAILS:


The Salem Witch Trials through Victorian Eyes


The people of Salem began hanging their neighbors in June 1692 and continued to do so for about three months, though their infamous witchcraft courts chugged along well into the next year. A century and a half later, Charles Upham published his first influential account of those eleven months. By then Salem was a far cry from the raw assemblage of farmsteads and clapboard village houses the accused and their accusers had known. Among other things, it had grown filthy rich. But for Upham, whatever its more recent glories, the town's motto might as well have been mea culpa. A Canadian transplant, Upham was sensitive to his adopted hometown’s image. Forever, he predicted, “those who know nothing else of our history or our character, will be sure to know, and tauntingly to inform us that they know, that we hanged the witches.” Man, was he right.  

In an attempt to understand what happened in Salem and why, the 19th century produced a vast literature on 17th-century witchcraft. Nathaniel Hawthorne is the most famous example, though it was clear to all that this (angry) great-great-grandson of an unreptentent Salem judge wasn’t just writing about the past; he was writing about the present. Via what was called the “Salem story,” Victorian America grappled with its own supernatural fixations (spiritualism), its own injustices (slavery), its own inhumanity (demonizing indigeneity and blackness), its own misogyny. This is one reason we still talk today about the Salem witch trials. As historian Bernard Rosenthal writes, “Salem, in the distant past, almost in a never-never land of magic, offers an imaginative landscape where we may more safely encounter the monsters we conjure,” from white supremacy to sexual violence.  

Informed by the post-secular turn in American literary scholarship, the “New Puritan Studies,” trauma studies, and theories of cosmopolitanism, this seminar explores 17th-century witch hunting through 19th-century eyes. We’ll read Hawthorne, of course, but we’ll spend most of our time working with a handful of the many middlebrow novels, poems, essays, and plays—including work by John W. De Forest, Ella Taylor Disoway, John Greenleaf Whittier, and Mary E. Wilkins—that tried to comprehend witch hunting and particularly Salem as fact and metaphor. We’ll also look to Victorian England, which was almost as obsessed with Salem, reading work by Harriet Martineau and Elizabeth Gaskell, who early in her career called herself “Cotton Mather Mills” and whose novella Lois the Witch remains one of the best if understudied literary reckonings of Salem’s butchery.

Grading

  • Participation (in person and in online discussions) 10%
  • Formal writing exercises (3 at 250-300 words each) 30%
  • Seminar paper draft (2500 words) with annotated bibliography 20%
  • Seminar paper (about 3000 words) 35%
  • Creative/critical/theoretical project (type/length up to you) 5%

NOTES:


Five notes about our texts and reading:
 

(1) De Forest, Disoway, Gaskell, and Wilkins are all out of print, in the public domain, and available on Canvas. That said, I’d very much like you to read these texts in hard copy. (The jury’s in: retention stinks when reading online.) So we’ll do this: at our first class meeting I’ll ask who would like to order bound hard copies of these books. Since we don’t need copyright permission, they’ll be cheap (probably $5 to $7 each). The copy shop in Cornerstone can have them ready for us in just days. The Burr, Hawthorne, and Graff/Birkenstein, meanwhile, will be in the SFU bookstore for purchase, though feel free to purchase whatever edition elsewhere if you like.  

(2) We’ll read significant amounts of scholarship on New England Puritanism and witch hunting, as well as theoretical work on trauma and cosmopolitanism (all available on Canvas). We’ll use this material to better understand our subjects, obviously, but also as fodder for practical and conceptual discussions about the writing process. My point: we’re not just going to do a lot of formal and informal writing; we’re going to talk a lot about writing, too.  

(3) In the company of one or two peers, each student will read an additional popular 19th-century witchcraft novel to introduce to the class. These introductions will be low-key affairs designed to complement rather than dominate class time, and they will factor into your participation grade. I will assign the texts, all of which are in the public domain and available on Canvas.  

(4) Robert Eggers’ 2015 film The Witch is a historically informed, unnerving visualization of the lived experience of 17th-century New England witchcraft and the Puritan “wonderworld,” i.e., the supernaturally infused reality in which Puritans lived day to day via their faith. It’s set before Salem but is a pitch-perfect depiction of the fear that gripped all the British North American colonies, not just New England. Please watch the film prior to our first class. I’ll be referencing it early on as I help you understand the religious physics of the world we’ll be inhabiting. For a primer on the film, read Anthony Lane’s excellent New Yorker review at www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/02/29/the-witch-review. Heads up: The Witch is pretty creepy and is rated R, with modest nudity.

(5) I’ve already gotten this question, so I’ll go ahead and answer it: Why isn’t Arthur Miller’s The Crucible on the reading list? Because it was published in the 1950s, and, in my humble opinion, its representation of its subject is wanting.

Materials

REQUIRED READING:

George Lincoln Burr, ed., Narratives of the New England Witchcraft Cases (Dover, 2001)

Nathaniel Hawthorne, The House of the Seven Gables (Modern Library, 2001)

Mary E. Wilkins, Giles Corey, Yeoman (public domain pdf)

John W. De Forest, Witching Times (public domain pdf)

Ella Taylor Disoway, South Meadows: A Tale of Long Ago (public domain pdf)

Gerald Graff & Cathy Birkenstein, They Say / I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing (Norton, 4th ed., 2018)

Elizabeth Gaskell, Lois the Witch (public domain pdf)

Department Undergraduate Notes:

IMPORTANT NOTE Re 300 and 400 level courses: 75% of spaces in 300 level English courses, and 100% of spaces in 400 level English courses, are reserved for declared English Major, Minor, Extended Minor, Joint Major, and Honours students only, until open enrollment begins.

For all On-Campus Courses, please note the following:
- To receive credit for the course, students must complete all requirements.
- Tutorials/Seminars WILL be held the first week of classes.
- When choosing your schedule, remember to check "Show lab/tutorial sections" to see all Lecture/Seminar/Tutorial times required.

Registrar Notes:

SFU’s Academic Integrity web site http://students.sfu.ca/academicintegrity.html is filled with information on what is meant by academic dishonesty, where you can find resources to help with your studies and the consequences of cheating.  Check out the site for more information and videos that help explain the issues in plain English.

Each student is responsible for his or her conduct as it affects the University community.  Academic dishonesty, in whatever form, is ultimately destructive of the values of the University. Furthermore, it is unfair and discouraging to the majority of students who pursue their studies honestly. Scholarly integrity is required of all members of the University. http://www.sfu.ca/policies/gazette/student/s10-01.html

ACADEMIC INTEGRITY: YOUR WORK, YOUR SUCCESS