Spring 2018 - PHIL 822 G100
Selected Topics in Normative Ethics (5)
Class Number: 12405
Delivery Method: In Person
Selected Topics: Ownership: Self and World
[Note: this course is to be taught concurrently with PHIL 421W.]
Important note regarding enrollment: instructor consent is required for all students apart from Philosophy graduate students.
This is a senior undergraduate and graduate level course in normative ethics. It examines the moral justification for rights of ownership. We focus primarily on a person’s right over intra-personal resources including: their body and its organs, as well as their talents and the benefits that flow from their use. These are commonly referred to as rights of self-ownership.
Why are rights of self-ownership a concept of philosophical interest? There is a long tradition, associated with Locke, according to which people have exclusive rights over all the resources located inside their skin. This is the starting point for many political libertarian arguments claiming that people have no moral duty to use their talents for the good of others, and every right to keep the market returns on their talents. Rights of self-ownership are also the starting point for arguments on issues that include: the right to abortion, the requirement for consent to sex, the right to retain inessential body parts (e.g. a spare kidney), as well as opposition to all forms of paternalism. These issues, where appeals to rights of self-ownership often figure prominently (if not always explicitly), are often analyzed in isolation. In this course, our approach is more holistic. We begin by examining several attempts to provide a unified account of the moral justification for rights of self-ownership. We proceed to cover some of the issues where philosophers have put those rights to work. Your instructor believes that this holistic approach is the best way to grapple with the very idea that a person owns him or herself.
Students are expected to contribute to class discussion, and read 2-3 papers each week. They will need to synthesize these readings to complete their final research paper.
COURSE-LEVEL EDUCATIONAL GOALS:
Important note: Students who have taken PHIL 822 in Spring 2017 may not take this course for further credit.
The general aim of the course is for students to learn how to:
- Identify a thesis and its supporting arguments in philosophical materials and other relevant sources
- Engage with those arguments in respectful discussion with peers
- Construct written arguments
- Conduct independent research
- Engage with the moral foundations of the law and policy using philosophical arguments and methods
The course is excellent preparation for: graduate school in philosophy, public policy degrees, law school, or business school, or for anyone intending to participate in public debates on domestic and foreign policy.
- Three short assignments (from a total of four, max 1 per week, due prior to class; the first due no later than week 4 and the last due no later than week 12, 600 words max) 15%
- Presentation: (to be given in Weeks 11-13, a run through of your research paper, you will also assign the readings that week) 30%
- One longer research paper (6000 words, due in a week before end of Exam period) 45%
- Participation (comprising both attendance and contribution to class discussion or office hour discussion) 10%
No Nonsense Paper Policy: In the interest of preserving a level playing field students submitting late papers without prior arrangement or a doctor's note will be penalized. Students caught plagiarizing or otherwise cheating will normally be recommended for suspension from the university.
All materials will be available from the Library. There is no course reader or text.
Graduate Studies Notes:
Important dates and deadlines for graduate students are found here: http://www.sfu.ca/dean-gradstudies/current/important_dates/guidelines.html. The deadline to drop a course with a 100% refund is the end of week 2. The deadline to drop with no notation on your transcript is the end of week 3.
SFU’s Academic Integrity web site http://students.sfu.ca/academicintegrity.html is filled with information on what is meant by academic dishonesty, where you can find resources to help with your studies and the consequences of cheating. Check out the site for more information and videos that help explain the issues in plain English.
Each student is responsible for his or her conduct as it affects the University community. Academic dishonesty, in whatever form, is ultimately destructive of the values of the University. Furthermore, it is unfair and discouraging to the majority of students who pursue their studies honestly. Scholarly integrity is required of all members of the University. http://www.sfu.ca/policies/gazette/student/s10-01.html
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY: YOUR WORK, YOUR SUCCESS