Spring 2018 - POL 373 J100

Human Security (4)

Class Number: 5308

Delivery Method: In Person

Overview

  • Course Times + Location:

    Jan 3 – Apr 10, 2018: Sat, 9:30 a.m.–1:20 p.m.
    Vancouver

  • Exam Times + Location:

    Apr 15, 2018
    Sun, 8:30–11:30 a.m.
    Vancouver

  • Prerequisites:

    Six lower division units in Political Science or permission of the department.

Description

CALENDAR DESCRIPTION:

Explores what is involved in shifting the focus in the security realm from 'national interest' to the safety and needs of humans. Addresses several contemporary issues of human insecurity such as genocide, terrorism, civil wars and other complex emergencies; the political economy of conflict (small arms, "blood" diamonds); 'new' inequalities (economic, gender, class, ethnicity); and new health risks (e.g. HIV/AIDS, SARS, ecological degradation). Considers recent initiatives and trends that have emerged to deal with these issues (e.g. humanitarian intervention, International Criminal Court, new coalitions of state and non-state actors such as the Ottawa Process on anti-personnel mines). Students with credit for POL 349 'Special Topics' for credit under this title may not take this course for further credit.

COURSE DETAILS:

This course examines the concept of human security in a changing world of globalization. We will explore past and contemporary debates surrounding the definition, conceptualization, and scope of human security, the forces and processes shaping ideas about human security in present times, and the role of international institutions in promoting human security. The course structure is as follows: Part I will address the question of “ what is human security” by tracing the origin, evolution, and controversies related to the “freedom from fear” vs. “freedom from want” meanings of the concept.  Part II will situate the concept of human security within traditional and critical approaches to security studies, especially in the context of civil conflicts and other inter-relational threats such as terrorism, poverty, hunger, disease, human rights abuses, and environmental degradation.  Part III will identify the role of international institutions and non-state actors, such as NGOs and Global Civil Society organizations in addressing present-day challenges to human security.  Leading questions will include, but are not limited to, the following:
•   Is human security “freedom from fear” or “freedom from want” or both?
•    Does the idea of human security essentially challenge or complement the   traditional approach to security?
•    Is the focus on human security a more accurate way of conceptualizing international security or insecurity in the 21st century? We will critically engage these questions to understand important theoretical and practical shifts in the discourse on human security.  

There will be a four-hour lecture each week

Grading

  • Presentation 15%
  • Short Policy Paper 20%
  • Major Research Paper 30%
  • Final Exam 25%
  • Attendance/Participation 10%

Materials

REQUIRED READING:

Hanlon, R. J., & Christie, K. (2016). Freedom from Fear, Freedom from Want: An Introduction to Human Security. University of Toronto Press.

Battersby, P., & Siracusa, J. M. (2009). Globalization and human security. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

RECOMMENDED READING:

MacFarlane, S. N., & Khong, Y. F. (2006). Human security and the UN: A critical history. Indiana University Press.

Department Undergraduate Notes:

The Department of Political Science strictly enforces a policy on plagiarism.
For details, see http://www.sfu.ca/politics/undergraduate/program/related_links.html and click on “Plagiarism and Intellectual Dishonesty” .

Registrar Notes:

SFU’s Academic Integrity web site http://students.sfu.ca/academicintegrity.html is filled with information on what is meant by academic dishonesty, where you can find resources to help with your studies and the consequences of cheating.  Check out the site for more information and videos that help explain the issues in plain English.

Each student is responsible for his or her conduct as it affects the University community.  Academic dishonesty, in whatever form, is ultimately destructive of the values of the University. Furthermore, it is unfair and discouraging to the majority of students who pursue their studies honestly. Scholarly integrity is required of all members of the University. http://www.sfu.ca/policies/gazette/student/s10-01.html

ACADEMIC INTEGRITY: YOUR WORK, YOUR SUCCESS