Spring 2019 - POL 314 D100

Theory and Explanation in Political Science (4)

Class Number: 6166

Delivery Method: In Person

Overview

  • Course Times + Location:

    Jan 3 – Apr 8, 2019: Mon, 1:30–5:20 p.m.
    Burnaby

  • Exam Times + Location:

    Apr 15, 2019
    Mon, 12:00–3:00 p.m.
    Burnaby

  • Prerequisites:

    Six lower division units in political science or permission of the department.

Description

CALENDAR DESCRIPTION:

A discussion of issues in the philosophy of the social sciences which are relevant to the study of politics and a critical evaluation of contemporary approaches to political inquiry, including empirical theory, rational choice theory and hermeneutics. Quantitative.

COURSE DETAILS:

This course is designated as a “Q” course, meaning that it is designed to introduce students to logical and quantitative methods of analysis in political science. Concepts and principles derived from Game Theory and Social Choice will be used for that purpose. Students will learn about, and apply, a variety of “games,” some of which, e.g., the Prisoner's Dilemma (PD), are very well known. Game Theory raises fundamental questions such as: do self-interested individuals end up working against their own interest? Can social cooperation emerge spontaneously, or do we need government to keep us in line? Why are political coalitions unstable? And Social Choice raises questions about the limitations of democratic procedures. Game Theory and Social Choice follow a deductive approach. It will be contrasted with other approaches that define the logic of social inquiry differently, either by using inductive methods of analysis (e.g., survey data analysis), or by moving completely away from “scientific” methods and paying more attention to the ways in which social problems are “constructed” by the actors themselves (i.e., interpretive approaches). In brief, the purpose of this course is to answer the question of how political scientists make sense of politics in general, but the emphasis bears more on formal/deductive methods than on the other two approaches because they are not covered in other methods courses.

 

There will be a two‐hour lecture and a one to two‐hour weekly discussion time.

Grading

  • Term Paper (12-15pp.) 40%
  • Mid-term 20%
  • Participation 10%
  • Final Exam 30%

Materials

REQUIRED READING:

Edward C. Rosenthal, The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Game Theory. Penguin Books, 2011

Department Undergraduate Notes:

The Department of Political Science strictly enforces a policy on plagiarism.
For details, see http://www.sfu.ca/politics/undergraduate/program/related_links.html and click on “Plagiarism and Intellectual Dishonesty” .

Registrar Notes:

SFU’s Academic Integrity web site http://www.sfu.ca/students/academicintegrity.html is filled with information on what is meant by academic dishonesty, where you can find resources to help with your studies and the consequences of cheating.  Check out the site for more information and videos that help explain the issues in plain English.

Each student is responsible for his or her conduct as it affects the University community.  Academic dishonesty, in whatever form, is ultimately destructive of the values of the University. Furthermore, it is unfair and discouraging to the majority of students who pursue their studies honestly. Scholarly integrity is required of all members of the University. http://www.sfu.ca/policies/gazette/student/s10-01.html

ACADEMIC INTEGRITY: YOUR WORK, YOUR SUCCESS