Research Design
- Research Design
- You must make a number of decisions when you plan a research study.
- These decisions concern a number of issues commonly referred to as "research design."
- The decisions you make here will have far-reaching implications for:
- how the research is conducted,
- the nature of the data you obtain,
- the kinds of analysis you will be able to do,
- the kinds of information you will obtain about the situation under investigation,
- the use to which that information may be put.
- Eight dimensions along which research varies
- basic vs. applied
- laboratory vs. field
- overt vs. unobtrusive
- quantitative vs. qualitative
- interpretive vs. functional
- experimental vs. naturalistic
- participant vs. non-participant
- cross-sectional vs. longitudinal
- quantitative vs. qualitative
- uses numbers, counting, and statistics; likely to be called "scientific"
vs.
- uses narrative, words, transcripts, documents; likely to be called "humanistic"
- Wars have been fought over this issue.
- Some people say quantitative is best; some say qualitative is best.
- I say you need both.
- interpretive vs. functional
- study of meaning, content analysis, deconstruction, postmodernist deconstruction
in which the meanings behind everything are laid bare; by its nature abstract
and conceptual
vs.
- study of behaviour and effects, meanings are seen as causes and effects
of communication behaviour
- experimental vs. naturalistic
- "scientific" -- manipulation of an independent variable followed by measurement
of dependent variable, random assignment to conditions, control
vs.
- study of processes as they take place in normal life activity, without
manipulating the observational environment
- laboratory vs. field
- research is conducted in an artificial environment, all aspects controlled
by the researcher
vs.
- research is conducted in a natural environment where people normally are
in the course of day-to-day life
- participant vs. non-participant
- researcher participates in the activities or situation being studied --anthropological
work as example
vs.
- observer is outside the situation and (ideally) has no effect on the processes
being observed
- overt vs. unobtrusive
- subjects are aware of the research, no attempt is made to hide the fact
that they are being observed/measured
vs.
- researcher isn't involved in the situation, isn't physically present;
covert; subjects are not aware of being observed
- cross-sectional vs. longitudinal
- measurement done at one point in time; past history and future conditions
are ignored; process is approximated by comparing people in different stages
of life to one another; uses a cross-section of the population
vs.
- over-time research, repeated measures of the same group of people; process
and change are actually observed/measured
- basic vs. applied
- focus is on purely theoretical issues; no attention is given to applications;
sometimes called "curiosity driven"
vs.
- focus is on addressing real problems, pragmatic issues