Rethinking Teaching in Higher Education
Home
Workshops
Research Activities
Researchers
Graduate Students
Publications & Presentations
Related Links
Simon Fraser University McGill Concordia University
     

SFU Rethinking Teaching Workshop | April 19-23, 2004


Monday April 19  --  CONTENT


8:30

Breakfast at the DUC

9:30

Introductions

10:00

Overview of course design process
Analysis of content

10:15

Case study: Fundamentals of Photonics

10:45

Development of concept maps

12:00


Lunch

1:30

Prepare concept map for presentation to small group

1:45

Microteaching (presentation of concept maps)

3:45

Review preparation for Tuesday
Formative evaluation

down

Reading related to Monday’s activities  (Content - Section II of the Readings)


Core reading

Novak, J. D. (1998). Meaningful learning for empowerment. In Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations (19-34). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Defines concept mapping.  Discusses the value of concept mapping in enhancing meaningful learning, helping students study more effectively, and organizing and sequencing instruction.

Complementary reading
Donald J. G., (1983). Knowledge Structures: Methods of exploring course content. Journal of Higher Education, 54(1), 31-41.
  • Describes disciplinary differences in how knowledge is structured.

Jonassen, D., Beissner, K., & Yacci, M. (1993). Explicit methods for conveying structural knowledge through concept maps. Structural knowledge: Techniques for representing, conveying and acquiring structural knowledge (155-163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Describes concept maps and discusses application and representation.

Preparation for Tuesday
  1. View your videotape and fill out the follow up form, if you find it useful to your thinking.
  2. Please revise your concept maps based on the feedback you received.
  3. Read the following in Sections I (Microteaching) and III (Outcome) of the readings in preparation for tomorrow.
Core reading 

Woodberry, R. D., & Aldrich, H.E. (2000). Planning and running effective classroom exercises. Teaching Sociology, Vol. 28, 241-248.

  • Offers concrete, practice-based suggestions for designing and executing in-class learning activities that engage students in active co-construction of knowledge.

LaSere Erickson, B., & Weltner-Strommer, D. (1991).  Knowing, understanding and thinking:  The goals of freshman instruction. In Teaching College Freshmen. (65-80). San Francisco:  Jossey-Bass.

  • A brief introduction to different forms of learning with definitions.

Complementary reading

Entwistle, N. (1998). Approaches to learning and forms of understanding. In B. Dart & Boulton-Lewis (Eds.), Teaching and learning in higher education (72-101). Melbourne: ACER.

  • A description of understanding the ways in which students approach learning in an academic environment.

Leckie, Gloria J. (1996). Desperately Seeking Citations: Uncovering Faculty Assumptions about the Undergraduate Research Process. In The Journal of Academic Librarianship. (201-208).

  • From the perspective of academic librarians, explores the limited success of undergraduate students with research paper assignments and proposes solutions based on a curriculum-integrated approaching that involves faculty members as partners in the instruction of appropriate information seeking and retrieval skills.