ECONOMICS 802
I am assuming that you generally are familiar with the
material in chapters
2, 3, and 5. I will cover a few sections in these
chapters, but you will
be mostly responsible for them on your own.
All non-chapter readings are in the library. Although
the papers are interesting in their own right, their general pupose is
to demonstrate how the various mechanics and ideas can be used to create
economic arguments. For example, the Solow paper provides a nice example
of how to use Euler's theorem. I'll try to let you know when we will
go through a paper in detail, and when we will be focusing
in on a particualar part. To help you a little bit, please
note that a `*' indicates more relevant reading.
Week 1: Maximization
* a. Silberberg, Ch. 1, Section 2.5, Section 3.6, Ch.
4.
* b. Alchian ``Evolution, Uncertainty, and Economic Theory''
Journal
of Political Economy 1950.
Week 2: Traditional Comparative
Static Methodology and the Envelope Theorem
* a. Silberberg, Ch. 4, Ch. 6.
Week 3: Cost Functions
* a. Silberberg, Ch. 7, Ch. 8.
b. Akerlof and Yellen. ``Can Small Deviations from Rationality
Make Significant Differences to Economic Equilibria?'' AER Sept.
1985.
c. Alchian ``Cost'' in Economic Forces At Work
Week 4: Cost Functions: Special Topics
* a. Silberberg, Ch. 8, Ch. 9.
b. Alchian ``Cost and Output'' in Economic Forces At
Work
Week 5: Midterm 1.
Week 6: Demand Theory
* a. Silberberg Ch. 10
* b. Barzel, ``The Testability of the Law of Demand''
in Sharpe and Cootner (eds) Financial Economics: Essays in Honor of
Paul Cootner 1982.
* c. Barzel and Suen ``The Demand Curves for Giffen Goods
Are Downward
Sloping''. EJ 1992.
Week 7: Demand: Special Topics
Consumer's Surplus
* a. Silberberg Ch. 11.5.
All-or-nothing Demands:
* a. Suen, ``Statistical Models of Consumer Behavior with
Heterogeneous
Values and Constraints'' EI, 1990.
* b. Barzel, ``Rationing by Waiting'' Journal
of Law and Econ.
1974.
Week 8: Special Topics, cont.
Household Production:
* a. Silberberg, Chapter 11.4.
b. Becker, ``A Theory of Allocation of Time,'' Economic
Journal
1965
c. Pollak and Wachter, ``The Relevance of the Household
Production
Function and Its Implications for the Allocation of Time,''
JPE
1975
Quality and Shipping the Good Apples:
* a. Leffler ``Ambiguous Changes in Product Quality''
AER
1982.
* b. Silberberg Chapter 11.3.
c. Umbeck ``Shipping the Good Apples Out: Some Ambiguities
in the Interpretation of `Fixed Charge'{''}, JPE 1980, 88 no. 1.
d. Kaempfer and Brastow, ``The Effect of Unit Fees on
the Consumption
of Quality'', EI 1985.
e. Bertonazzi, et al. ``Some Evidence on the Alchian
and Allen Theorem: The Third Law of Demand?'' EI July 1993.
Week 9: Midterm 2.
Week 10: Intertemporal Choice
* a. Silberberg, Chapter 12.
Week 11: Expected Utility Theory
* a. Silberberg Chap. 13.
Week 12: Contracts and Incentives
* a.Silberberg Chap. 15.
ECONOMICS 802 PROBLEM SETS
This package contains old problems and exam questions
that I've asked over the years that are relevant to 802. The purpose of
these questions is to familiarize you to the type of question I might ask
you on an exam, and to give you some practice in both technical and intuitive
questions. I won't hand out the answers so don't ask me. I suggest you
form a study group and work on them each week.
I will announce which questions are due for assignments throughout
the semester.
-
1)
-
It is a ``well known fact'' that the correlation between investor return
and education level for stockbrokers is negative - better brokers usually
have less education. Is this consistent with the notion of maximization
or a refutation of it?
-
2)
-
Consider the following two models of a discriminating monopolist subject
to a tax in one market:
| (i) |
max
y1,y2 |
R1(y1) + R2(y2)
- C(y1+y2) -ty1 |
|
| (ii) |
max
y1,y2 |
R1(y1) + R2(y2)
- C(y1,y2) -ty1 |
|
-
In model one, cost is a function only of total output, whereas in (ii),
cost is a more complicated (and general) function of each separate output.
The tax rate t is a parameter.
-
Demonstrate any (potentially) observable similarities and differences between
these two models.
-
3)
-
From question (2), and using model (i), compare the effect on total output
y = y1+y2 from:
-
a.
-
a per unit tax t on y1 alone, versus
-
b.
-
a per unit tax t on y.
-
4)
-
Consider the profit maximization model with two factor inputs, x1,
x2.
-
a.
-
Derive the choice functions for this model.
-
b.
-
Show that the factor demand functions are homogeneous. Of what degree?
In what parameters?
-
c.
-
Show that the elasticities of x*i(w1,w2,p)
with respect to w1, w2, p must sum to zero.
-
d.
-
Define x2 as an inferior factor when
¶x2*/ ¶p
< 0. Does this make sense as a definition of inferiority?
-
e.
-
If x2 is an inferior factor, then show that ¶x*2/w1>
0 .
-
f.
-
Continue to assume that x2 is an inferior factor. Derive the
expression for the response of demand for x1 to changes in the
output price. What do you know about the sign of this derivative?
-
g.
-
Now suppose that x2 is held constant (at its previously profit
maximizing level). How does the response of x1 to changes in
the output price compare with the case where x2 is allowed to
vary?
-
h.
-
How would your answer to (g) change if x2 were normal rather
than inferior, and x1 were inferior?
-
5)
-
Consider the utility function of U(x1, x2), where
U1, U2 > 0. For a given
level of utility, x2 is a function of x1; that is,
Convexity of the utility function is essentially equivalent to the requirement
that
-
a.
-
Show that this condition is true, if and only if the determinant:
|
ê
ê
ê
ê
ê
ê |
|
|
|
ê
ê
ê
ê
ê
ê |
> 0 |
|
You will have to make use of the assumption that Ui >
0.
-
6)
-
Consider the direct utility function U = x13x23.
-
a.
-
Verify that this utility function is an increasing monotonic transformation
of the Cobb-Douglas utility function V = x1.5x2.5.
Does this imply that U is a well behaved utility function?
-
b.
-
Show that U exhibits increasing marginal utility for both goods. What is
the moral of this?
-
7)
-
Now consider the utility function U = -.5[V(x)]2 + V(x) where
V(x) = x12 + x22 -2.
-
a.
-
Show that in a neighborhood of the point (1,1), Ui(1,1) >
0
and Uii(1,1) < 0, so that the
utility function exhibits positive but diminishing marginal utility.
-
b.
-
Show that U is an increasing monotonic transformation of V provided that
the x's are close to the point (1,1). That is, show that the function f(z)
= -.5z2+z is monotonically increasing in the neighborhood of
z = 0.
-
c.
-
Show that U is not a well-behaved utility function. (Hint: draw the indifference
curves). What is the moral of this utility function?
-
8)
-
Consider an economic model whose general mathematical structure is:
|
max
x1,x2 |
y = f(x1,x2,a)
= g(x1,x2) + h(x1,a) |
|
Where x1 and x2 are choice variables and a
represents one or more parameters. Let F(a)
represent the maximum value of f(x1,x2,a)
for any given value of a.
-
a.
-
How are the choice functions, xi*(a)
derived?
-
b.
-
How is F(a) derived?
-
c.
-
Show that the rates of change of F and h with
respect to a are the same, for choices consistent
with the model.
-
d.
-
Show that at such points, the rate of change of the slope of F
is greater than the corresponding rate for h.
-
e.
-
Illustrate (b), (c), and (d) graphically, labeling your graph carefully.
-
f.
-
Show that h1a ¶x*i/¶a
> 0 for any a. Explain why this is the
source of the comparative static results.
-
9)
-
Consider the standard utility maximization model
|
max
x1 ... xn |
U(x1 ... xn) |
|
subject to
with implied Marshallian demands x*i, and marginal
utility of income l*.
-
a.
-
Show that U*pi = -l*x*i.
-
b.
-
Show that ¶(l*x*i)/¶pj
= ¶(l*x*j)/¶pi
-
c.
-
Suppose now that U*(p1 ... pn, M) is additively
separable in the prices, (ie U*pipj = 0). Show that
|
¶xi*/¶pk
¶xj*/¶pk |
= |
xi*
xj* |
|
|
where k ¹ i,j.
-
10)
-
Let f(x) be a constant returns to scale production function. Show that
if every factor x1 is paid the value of its marginal product
pfi then profits are zero.
-
11)
-
Let y = f(x1,x2) be a production function that is
homogeneous of degree one. Show that if the average product of input 1
is increasing then the marginal product of input 2 must be negative.
-
12)
-
Consider y = Ax1a x2b
where a+ b = 1.
-
a.
-
Show that this production function exhibits CRS.
-
b.
-
For a two factor crs production function, the elasticity of substitution
is given by:
Calculate this for the function given.
-
c.
-
Assuming price taking in both markets, calculate the cost minimizing input
demand functions.
-
d.
-
Can you calculate the profit maximizing demands? Why not?
-
13)
-
Consider the utility function U(x,y) = x2 + y2.
-
a.
-
Do these preferences satisfy quasi-concavity?
-
b.
-
Derive the ordinary demand curves x* and y* and the
utility constant demand curves.
-
c.
-
What is the expenditure function for these preferences? Fix py
= 1 and U = 1 and draw M(px,py,U) as a function of
px.
-
14)
-
A demand study results in the following data:
| x1(p1 = 20, p2
= 10, M = 500) = 20 |
|
| x2(p1 = 20, p2
= 10, M = 500) = 10 |
|
|
¶x1(p1
= 20, p2 = 10, M = 500)
¶p2 |
= 2 |
|
|
¶h2(p1
= 20, p2 = 10, U = u(20,10))
¶p1 |
= 3 |
|
Where h is the utility constant demand curve. Use this information and
the fact that demand is utility generated to estimate x1(20,
10, 501).
-
15)
-
The Lagrange multiplier on the budget constraint in a standard utility
maximization problem is often referred to as the marginal utility of money.
The reciprocal of this multiplier is given by the partial derivative of
the expenditure function with respect to utility. Using this, show that
there exists a normalization of U(x) such that l
is independent of U if preferences are homothetic.
-
16)
-
Suppose that a consumer is endowed with goods Xi rather than
money income. The demands that result from such a model are often called
``Slutsky'' demands, and we can denote them as Xi = Xs(p,
X0) (where p is the price vector and X0 is the endowment).
If we endowed the individual with dollars, rather than goods we would get
a Marshallian demand Xi = Xm(p,M), and of course,
we can also define a Hicksian demand Xi = Xu(p,U0).
Assume throughout this question that Xi is inferior, but not
Giffen.
-
a.
-
Explain the meaning of the following identity:
| Xmi(p,M(p,U0))
º
Xui(p,U0)
º
Xsi(p,X0*0(p,U0)) |
|
Where X0*0 is an expenditure like function that minimizes
the endowment of X0, necessary to reach a given level of utility.
-
b.
-
At the point of identity, what is true about the slopes of each demand
curve?
-
c.
-
When you are not at the point of identity what is true about the slopes
of the three demand curves?
-
d.
-
Now draw the demands for good i.
-
e.
-
Explain why the demands are different, being as intuitive as possible.
-
17)
-
Consider the Cobb-Douglas production function:
-
a.
-
Is this function homogeneous? Of what degree? Under what conditions will
it be concave?
-
b.
-
Let v be the rental rate on captital, and w be the wage for labor. Derive
the conditional factor demand functions and the cost function. Verify the
properties of the cost function.
-
18)
-
Consider the production function:
-
a.
-
Is this function homogeneous? Of what degree? Is it concave?
-
b.
-
Find the conditional factor demands and the cost function. Verify the properties
of the cost function.
-
19)
-
Consider the following production function:
| Q = [ak-b + (1-a)l-b]-1/b |
|
where 0 < a < 1
and -1 < b < ¥.
-
a.
-
Is this function homogeneous? Of what degree?
-
b.
-
What are the conditional demand functions?
-
20)
-
In class we defined a CES production function. Find the associated cost
function.
-
21)
-
Suppose a company offers its employees free parking that would rent for
$200 per month. Employees are not allowed to sublet the spots. If the company
decides to charge $200 per month for the spaces, would we expect any change
in the quality of cars parked in the lot? (If it makes it easier, assume
there are only two kinds of cars: good cars which cost $500 per month to
rent, and poor cars which cost $100 per month to rent.)
-
22)
-
An economist at UCLA did the following test. He watched coffee drinkers
at the school's cafeteria and counted how many that had coffee-to-go purchased
large cups vs. small cups, and repeated the procedure for people consuming
coffee within the cafeteria. He claimed that consumer theory predicts that
people having coffee-to-go will consume the larger cups, relative to those
remaining. Why would he predict this? Do you agree?
-
23)
-
Consider the following set of preferences:
Suppose income (M) is 100, py = 1 and px = 1 initially.
-
a.
-
Show that the demand for x is independent of income.
-
b.
-
Let the price of x fall from 1 to .25. Calculate (a) the consumer surplus
(b) the compensating variation (c) the equivalent variation associated
with this fall in px.
-
c.
-
In general CV and EV will not be equal to one another. In light of your
answer to this question explain why not.
|
Px |
Qx |
Py |
Qy |
|
|
| Time 1 |
10 |
20 |
5 |
20 |
|
|
|
| Time 2 |
8 |
15 |
8 |
? |
|
-
24)
-
Answer the following based on the table above. X and Y are the only two
goods. The consumer has stable, ``normal'' (convex, transitive, etc.) preferences.
For what values of Qy in Time 2 can we conclude that:
-
a.
-
the consumer is better off in Time 1 than Time 2.
-
b.
-
the consumer is better off in Time 2 than Time 1.
-
c.
-
x is inferior.
-
d.
-
y is inferior.
-
25)
-
An individual consumes two commodities x1 and x2
which are sold at prices p1, p2. His expenditure
function is given by:
| M(p1,p2,u) = (a0
+a1u2)p1 + (b0 +b1u2)p2 |
|
where a0, a1, b0, b1 are all
positive.
-
a.
-
Use the Envelope theorem to derive the compensated demand functions for
the two goods. What is the own price substitution effect for each of these
commodities? From this, what can you infer about the shape of the indifference
curves for the preferences that generated this expenditure function?
-
b.
-
The government intends to place a fixed sales tax (t) on commodity 1 so
that the post tax price of x1 will be p1+t. At the
same time the government wants to leave the individuals's welfare unchanged
by handing out a lump sum transfer of S. For the expenditure function above,
derive an expression for the subsidy that maintains the consumer's utility
unchanged. In principal S could depend on (p1, p2,
t, u). Does it depend on all of these in this case? If not explain why
not.
-
26)
-
Determine whether each of the following is a legitimate expenditure function:
-
a.
-
M = p1p2U.
-
b.
-
M = p1a p21-aU
for 0 < a < 1.
-
c.
-
M = (p2/p1)U.
-
27)
-
An individual has preferences for current and future consumption which
can be represented by the utility function
| U(C0,C1) = 5lnC0
+ 4ln C1. |
|
The individual has an endowment of Y0 in the current period
and Y1 in the future period. The interest rate is r.
-
a.
-
Does the individual exhibit a ``time preference'' for current consumption?
Find the optimal C0 as a function of r, Y0, and Y1,
and express net borrowing, (C0 -Y0) as a function
of the same parameters. How does net borrowing vary with r? What happens
if Y1 = 0?
-
b.
-
Suppose an economy consists of 200 people with these preferences. 100 of
these individuals has an endowment of 10 in the current period and nothing
in the future, and the remaining 100 have an endowment of nothing now and
9 in the future. What is the equilibrium interest rate?
-
28)
-
Assume that an individual has an intertemporal utility function of the
following form:
| U = |
T
å
t = 0 |
(1+d)-tU(Ct) |
|
where Ct is consumption in year t, and d
is the pure time preference rate. Assume perfect capital markets and a
constant one period interest rate of r. The individual has an exogenous
stream of income Yt t = 0, 1, ... T which he allocates to consumption
and saving over his life so as to maximize U. Analyze the effect of the
following on the lifetime pattern of consumption and savings.
-
a.
-
An increase in the interest rate at all dates.
-
b.
-
Income in a single period rises.
-
c.
-
An income tax is imposed that taxes comprehensive income (ie. Yt
plus any interest income).
-
d.
-
A public pension scheme is introduced in which persons contribute a fixed
amount every year for years 1 through t and then receive benefits from
years t through T. The scheme is actuarily sound in that the present value
of contributions equals the present value of benefits.
-
29)
-
Consider the following pair of prospects:
-
A.
-
($1000; 1), a certainty of receiving $1000, vs.
-
B.
-
($5000, $1000, 0; .1,.89, .01)
-
Where the $ figures are payoffs and the numbers following the semi-colon
are the probabilities attached to each payoff respectively.
-
Choose which of A or B you would prefer.
-
Now consider a second pair of prospects:
-
C.
-
($1000, 0; .1, .9)
-
D.
-
($1000, 0; .11,.89)
-
Choose which of C or D you would prefer.
-
The independence axiom of the expected utility hypothesis states: ``a risky
prospect A is weakly preferred to a risky prospect B if a p, 1-p chance
of A or C respectively is weakly preferred to a p, 1-p chance of B or C
for arbitrary positive probability p and risky prospects A, B and C.''
-
a.
-
If an individual were indifferent between A and B, and if his preferences
conformed to the independence axiom, describe his indifference curves for
varying probabilities (A, B; p, 1-p) of receiving A or B.
-
b.
-
If an individual preferred B to A, what ordering by the individual of C
and D would violate the independence axiom? Explain.
-
c.
-
If the independence axiom were omitted, how would expected utility analysis
be complicated?
-
30)
-
Consider the utility function u(y) = 100 + 200y - y2.
-
a.
-
Over what range is that utility function monotonically increasing?
-
b.
-
Over this acceptable range, what is the Arrow-Pratt measure of absolute
risk aversion? Does it rise or fall with income?
-
c.
-
What are the consequences for the demand price of a risky asset (4, 2;
.5, .5) as certain income rises from 40 to 60 for this utility function.
Relate your answer in (c) to (b).
-
31)
-
Consider a situation where consumption decisions are being made for the
next period. There are two states, a and b, and the subjective probabilities
held by all individuals are pa =
.5, pb = .5.
-
There is one group of individuals with utility function v = C1.5
and another with the utility function v = lnC1. Each group has
the same number of individuals with the same endowments (y1a,
y1b) = (400, 100). To simplify, consider trade (price taking)
between a representative individual from each group with the demands of
the representative individuals together equal to their endowments in equilibrium.
What is the relative price of a claim on consumption in state `a' to that
of a claim in state `b'?
OLD EXAM QUESTIONS
-
32)
-
Consider an expenditure function M(p1,p2,U0).
-
a.
-
Prove that M*p1 = x1. What is x1?
-
b.
-
Show that the marginal cost of utiltiy falls with an increase in price
of good 1 if good 1 is an iferior good.
-
33)
-
Consider the third model of Barzel and Suen (if you didn't read that far,
don't dispair, the mechanics are identical to the first model). Suppose
that there are only two goods per period, and that the utility function
within each period is additively separable and has diminishing marginal
utility for each good.
-
a.
-
What is the income effect for both goods within a given period?
-
b.
-
Does the Barzel and Suen argument imply that normal goods will have upward
sloping demands? That is, if the price of good 1 increases in a future
period, do people transfer income to that period, and therefore have the
possibility of having the income effect offset the substitution effect?
-
c.
-
If it is possible to have inferior inputs in production, why are the profit
maximizing demand curves for inputs always downward sloping. How does your
argument relate to the paper by Barzel and Suen?
-
34)
-
You've won a trip to the CEA meetings in PEI this summer! The university
will pay for one economy ticket, but if you want to go first class, you'll
have to pay the difference yourself. An economy ticket normally costs $500
while a first class ticket normally costs $1000.
-
35)
-
Suppose U(x1,x2) has vertically parallel indifference
curves if you put x1 on the horizontal axis.
-
a.
-
Sow graphically what the income effect is for good 1. Bonu points if you
can show this algerbraically as well (this isn't hard, it just takes a
bit of time)]
-
b.
-
What does this imply about the demand for good 2?
-
c.
-
What will be true about the ordinary demand (xm) and the Hicksian
demand (xu)?
-
36)
-
How long will you wait for an elevator, given that you've decided to take
it? Why?
-
37)
-
Consider the model of firms in long-run competitive equilibrium, where
competition forces each firm to minimize
Where y = f(x1,x2) is the firm's production function.
-
a.
-
Holding w2 fixed at some w20 throughout,
and letting xi0 = x*(w10,
w20) sketch AC and AC*. Explain why your
graph looks the way it does, and in particular show geometrically that
AC* is concave in w1.
-
b.
-
Show that
-
c.
-
Show that
|
¶(x1*/Y*)
¶w2 |
= |
¶(x2*/Y*)
¶w1 |
|
|
-
38)
-
Farmer Willy has a two period time horizon, and he grow and exclusively
eats turnips. His utility function is
where xi is the amount of turnips consumed in period i. He currently
has 1000 bushels of turnips on hand, which he will eat in the current period
or plant for harvest in the next period. Each bushel of turnips planted
this period yields 3/2 bushels next period.
-
a.
-
If there is no capital market, how many turnips will Willy (i) consume
this period? (ii) plant this period? (iii) consume next period?
-
b.
-
Now suppose there is a capital market in which Willy can either borrow
against his future harvest or invest his current harvest, and let r denote
the interest rate. How much will Willy (i) consume this period? (ii) plant
this period? (iii) harvest next period? (iv) consume next period?
-
39)
-
Ransford, that wild and crazy economist, and famous Nevada gambler, says
that he would prefer having $90 with certainty to having a 1/3 chance of
winning $90, but that he would prefer the 1/3 chance of winning $90 to
receiving $20 with certainty. Moreover, receiving $20 with certainty is
preferable to a 1/2 chance of winning $20, but the 1/2 chance of $20 dominates
a 1/4 chance of winning $90. Are Ransford's preferences consistent with
maximizing expected utility? Explain.
-
40)
-
One day, Karim the economist was waiting in a line for almost an hour.
When the person in front of him got to the head of the line he had to fill
out a form which took about five minutes. The person complained that the
time spent in line would be much less if the office gave the forms to those
in line before they reached the window so they could fill them out while
waiting. The clerk thought this was a good idea, and was about to tell
the supervisor the plan when Karim said ``Excuse me''. What did Karim say?
-
41)
-
Guomin has to decide how much of his $100 to put into bonds and how much
to hold as money. The interest rate r = 5%, and bonds earn interest. If
state a occurs bonds have a capital gain of g = 10, but if sate b occurs
they have a capital loss of l = 10, so that his state budget line passes
through the point where Wa = Wb = $105 with a slope
of -1. Suppose Guomin's utility is given by V(Wa, Wb)
= paWa + (1-pa)Wb.
-
a.
-
What must be true about pa in order
for Guomin to hold some bonds?
-
42)
-
Now suppose that at the beginning of period 0 his portfolio is initially
entirely in money, and that in order to buy bonds or sell them short he
must pay now out of his $100 a brokerage fee of 2% of the current value
of any bonds in which he trades.
-
b.
-
Draw the budget line in Wa, Wb space.
-
c.
-
What value of pa is now necessary
in order to induce the investor to hold any bonds?
-
43)
-
Why do North Americans have a reputation for wasting food, buy keeping
appointments?
-
44)
-
Last week when I was at the gym, I overheard the following conversation.
-
Person 1:
-
``Boy that was a hard squash game''
-
Person 2:
-
``Yeah, but you didn't play for very long.''
-
Person 1:
-
``True. I just reached the point of diminishing returns, and quit.''
-
Is this person an economist? That is, is it true that people stop doing
things when they reach the point of diminishing returns?
-
45)
-
In the standard two good model, if good 1 is a Giffen good, what does that
say about whether good 2 is a gross complement or substitute?
-
46)
-
In class we saw that ¶xi*
/p was ambiguous in sign. That is, when the output price increased, more
or less of an input might be used. Using the fact that the supply curve
of a profit maximizing firm is upward sloping, show that both inputs cannot
decrease with an increase in p.
-
47)
-
Consider the following model:
| f(x1,x2,a)
= (x1x2).5 + ln ax1 |
|
where the x's are the choice variables and a
is a parameter. Define F(a)
as the maximum value of f given a. On a graph,
with a on the horizontal axis and f and F
on the vertical axis, explain geometrically why, in a neighborhood of some
arbitrary a = a0
-
a.
-
Fa = fa.
-
b.
-
Faa = faa.
-
c.
-
Using the Conjugate Pairs theorem, find ¶x1*
/ ¶a.
-
48)
-
Suppose that lm = lm(M)
That is, suppose it did not depend on prices.
-
a.
-
Show that
-
b.
-
Using the above result, and the Slutsky equation, find the relationship
between the income effects for x1 and x2.
-
c.
-
A homothetic utility map implies that
Can you use the result in (b) to show that lm
= lm(M) implies that the utility
map is homothetic?
-
49)
-
A former graduate student at SFU wanted to test the Alchian and Allen proposition.
He collected data on tea from Sri Lanka and England. He, indeed, found
that the relative price of the high quality tea fell when it was shipped
to England. To his horror, though, the quantity of high quality tea consumed
was higher in Sri Lanka! In his paper he concluded that the demand for
tea was upward sloping. Can you think of something obvious that the student
overlooked with respect to the Alchian and Allen proposition?
-
50)
-
Suppose you had a stock that just fell in price. How could you tell if
this was due to a fall in the expected net profits, or due to a rise in
real interest rates? (Hint: could you think of another market you could
look at?)
-
51)
-
The paper by Pollak and Wachter said that unless there were CRS and no
joint production, we couldn't say anything about the demands for commodities.
However, in class I showed you two cases where there was joint production
and we could still say something (remember the case of productive consumption
- ``dressing for success'').
-
a.
-
Why were we able to get a result, P & W notwithstanding?
-
b.
-
A lot of consumption behavior is counter productive. For example the consumption
of cigarettes and drugs can reduce rather than increase earnings. Suppose
we think of this problem as:
| max U(x1 ...
xn) st |
å |
pixi = M-G(x1) |
|
Where x1 is the destructive product, and G¢
> 0 and G¢¢ > 0. What will
be true about the income effect relative to the case of pure consumption?
(Hints: If you can't recall, with the productive consumption case the answer
was
|
¶x*
¶M |
= |
1
1+S11E11 |
|
¶x10
F. |
|
|
Your might also want to think of E as equalling -G.)
-
c.
-
Assuming, as with the productive consumption case, that there is a similar
effect with respect to the slope of the demand curve as what you found
in (b) would you predict alcoholics to have more or less elastic demands
for alcohol? Does this make sense?
-
52)
-
The quantity of timber in a growing forest is f(t) after t years. The price
of a unit of lumber is constant over time and is denoted by p. There is
only a fixed costs, c, of harvesting this forest. The rate of interest
is r, and interest is compounded continuously. Consider only the case of
a single rotation.
-
a.
-
Derive an expression which characterizes the optimal harvest time for this
lumber given that you want to maximize net present value. What are the
second order conditions for this optimization problem?
-
b.
-
How does an increase in the harvest cost affect the optimal t? Verify your
answer.
-
53)
-
Consider the following data about the two objective characteristics of
three homogeneously divisible products:
|
X1 |
X2 |
X3 |
| Units of char. 1 per lb. |
30 |
30 |
70 |
| Units of char. 2 per lb. |
70 |
30 |
30 |
| Price per lb. |
30 |
|
30 |
|
What is the critical price of X2 (i.e. the price at or below
which some consumers may buy it, and above which no one will buy it)?
-
54)
-
A firm exists over a sequence of periods. Its production function for period
t is
Where Qt, Kt, and Lt are the period t
output, capital input, and labor input respectively. Capital accumulation
is given by
Where It is period t investment and d
is the depreciation rate. The period t output price, wage rate, and price
of the capital good are pt, wt, and qt
respectively, and the interest rate, r is constant over time. What is the
optimal investment in the initial period, I0, given that the
initial capital stock, K0 is predetermined by past decisions?
-
55)
-
Let
| p0 = pf(x10,x20)-w10x10-w20x20 |
|
be a constrained profit function. Let p*(w1,w2,p)
be our regular profit maximizing profit function where the choice variables
are allowed to vary when the parameters change.
-
a.
-
Graph p* and p0
against p.
-
b.
-
What comparative statics are obvious from the graph?
-
c.
-
Explain the result in part (b) in plain English.
-
56)
-
Suppose that lm = lm(p1),
where lm is the marginal utility
of money income, and comes from our standard two good utility maximization
problem.
-
a.
-
Using the Envelope theorem (without proving it) find the income effects
for x1m and x2m.
-
b.
-
Again using the Envelope theorem, show that the cross effects are equal.
(ie. ¶x1m / ¶p2
= ¶x2m /¶p1)
-
c.
-
Could good 1 be a Giffen good? Why or Why not?
-
57)
-
My wife belongs to a fitness club. The other day I went to meet her there
and I commented on how few patrons there were. She said ``well it doesn't
matter that much, because the owners of the club also own the building''.
How can you tell my wife is an accountant at heart?
-
58)
-
An economist, using faculty and industry wages, estimated that the value
of a ``faculty lifestyle'' was worth about $30,000 per year. That is, the
sacrifice in income that a Phd made by entering academics rather than private
industry was about $30,000. Following the Suen argument, would this be
an accurate estimate, or an under or over estimate, assuming that individuals
with Phd's are heterogenous with respect to valuing leisure?
-
59)
-
A university (where parking is priced above the market clearing price)
recently increased the price of parking in its two lots by $15 per term.
Lot A is unambiguously better than lot B, and the prices reflect this at
$60 and $30 respectively. What would you predict will happen in terms of
the usage of the two lots? (Ignore income effects).
-
60)
-
``The Fisher Separation Theorem implies that firms maximize the net present
value of investment.'' True or False? (In your answer, assume that a firm
lasts two periods. In the first period an investment `I' is made, and in
the next period some output f(I) is realized.)
-
61)
-
Explain the following two observations using Becker's theory of household
production. Feel obligated to also spell out any assumptions you must make
regarding incomes, wage rates, etc.
-
a.
-
Despite years of ``gender education'', if you walk into any toy store you
will see that most of the ``girl'' toys are Barbie dolls, kitchen supplies,
and other sundry household items, while the bulk of ``boy'' toys are cars,
swords, and anything to do with Batman.
-
b.
-
Estimates of the elasticities of gasoline and haircuts show that at a given
price, the elasticity of gas is greater than the elasticity of haircuts.
-
62)
-
Assume that an individual has an intertemporal utility function of the
following form:
| U = |
2
å
t = 1 |
|
1
(1+r)t-1 |
U(xt) |
|
Assume perfect capital markets and a constant interest rate of r. The individual
has an exogenous stream of income X0t where t = 1,2
which he allocates to consumption over his life to maximize U.
-
a.
-
Using math, show what would happen to the absolute levels of consumption
if there was an unanticipated fall in the interest rate. (That is, I want
you to grind through the comparative statics. Recall that for a constrained
max problem the m ×m BPPM have sign (-1)m-r where r is
the number of constraints.)
-
b.
-
Show your answer to (a) graphically. (If you were unable to do part (a),
you should still be able to do this.)
-
c.
-
Suppose there were more than two periods involved. Could this type of utility
function allow for ``ratchet effects'' in consumption? That is, some people
claim that once you get used to high consumption level it is harder to
go back to a low consumption level than if you had never had a high consumption
period.
-
63)
-
Briefly evaluate the following statements:
-
a.
-
``Strong (additive) separability and homogeneous separability are mutually
exclusive concepts''.
-
b.
-
``Strong (additive) separability rules out Giffen goods, but homogeneous
separability does not.''
-
64)
-
If the utility function is strongly separable, then ¶Xmi/¶Pj
= 0. True/False/ Uncertain. Explain.
-
65)
-
Suppose U = x1+x2a
where a < 0.
-
a.
-
Is this a well behaved utility function? Explain.
-
b.
-
Graph it with x2 on the horizontal axis.
-
c.
-
Is consumer's surplus well defined for x2?
-
66)
-
The price of beer is $.50 each and you buy 6. The price falls to $.25 each
and you buy 10. If beer is a normal good, both the compensating and the
equivalent variation measures of consumer's surplus will lie in the range
of $1.50 to $2.50. True/False/Uncertain. Explain.
-
67)
-
Consider Barzel's model of rationing by waiting.
-
a.
-
What happens to the total waiting time if the total amount (N) given away
increases? What happens to the waiting time per unit?
-
b.
-
Answer the same question, except this time the batch size (k) increases?
-
68)
-
From Wing's model of heterogeneous consumers, what happens to the value
of using a price mechanism (as opposed to random allocation) when the size
of the market increases? (ie. there are more of every type of consumer.)
(No math is required, a graph and intuitive explanation will do.)
-
69)
-
Assume the following utility function
Where ki are constants that are greater than zero, e is a constant
between zero and one, and the x¢s are the
goods. Can we solve the consumers maximization problem in this case via
a two stage process where first the consumer decides the expenditures on
various goods groups and then decides the division of the group expenditures
on the goods of the various types? Be sure to indicate your understanding
of the question in your answer.
-
70)
-
Empirical studies have noted that when education increases within a family,
the number of children, television sets, and pounds of food within a household
falls. At the same time, the dollars spent per child, per TV, and per pound
all increase. Why might this happen?
-
71)
-
Norm, a risk averse individual, is given the opportunity to make a drawing
from one of two density functions, f(x) or g(x), where x is a cash prize.
The means of the distributions are equal and the variance of f(x) is larger
than the variance of g(x). Norm will choose to draw from g(x). True or
False, explain (Five (5) bonus points for drawing your answer correctly.)
-
72)
-
Assuming everyone in the class is in an intertemporal competitive equilibrium,
we all have the same marginal rate of time preference. True or False, explain.
-
73)
-
If Rob calculated a value of Mike's coefficient of absolute risk aversion
to be -4.
-
a.
-
What does this mean?
-
b.
-
If Mike faced a gamble which had a standard deviation of 3, what would
his risk premium be?
-
c.
-
If Mike wakes up tomorrow, and his utility function has changed to U =
40+160v(c) where v(c) is his utility function today, and he faced the same
gamble, what would his new risk premium be?
-
74)
-
What will have a larger influence in revising your annual consumption,
a gift of $1000 or an anticipated salary increase of $50/month if the real
rate of interest is 10% per year, and you will work for 40 more years.
(Ignore compounding within a given year.)
-
75)
-
Christy has an initial wealth level of W0 and must decide how
much to invest in a risky asset earning a random rate of return, r, and
how much to invest in a riskless asset whose rate of return is 5%. final
wealth will be:
where A is the amount invested in the risky asset. Christy is an expected
utility maximizer, with a VNM utility function
-
a.
-
What are Christy's absolute and relative risk aversion functions?
-
b.
-
Suppose r = .8 with probability .6, and r = -.45 with probability .4. Derive
the optimal A* as a function of W0.
-
c.
-
How does the optimal A* vary as W0 increases? Is
this consistent with what you know about Christy's absolute risk aversion
function?
-
76)
-
Consider the model
|
max |
f(x1,x2,a)
= g(x1+x2) + a2x1 |
|
where the xi's (assumed positive) are the choice variables and
a
is a parameter. Define f(a)
as the indirect function of f for a given a.
On a graph, with a on the horizontal axis and
f and f on the vertical axis, explain geometrically
why, in the neighborhood of some arbitrary a
= a0,
-
a.
-
fa = fa
-
b.
-
faa > faa
> 0.
-
c.
-
Prove (a) algebraically
-
d.
-
prove (b) algebraically
-
e.
-
From part (d), prove that ¶x1*/¶a
> 0.
-
77)
-
Consider a firm with production function y = f(x1,x2)
which maximizes sincerity minus taxes, where sincerity equals
| s(x1,x2) = ey
+Ö2 log(x1 +x2)e
+3.5x1x2y2. |
|
A per unit tax t is levied on x1. Assuming the first and second
order conditions for a maximum hold, what effects will increasing t have
on the firms use of x1, x2?
-
78)
-
A friend of mine was looking at a house for sale with plans of renting
it out to a tenant (the house sold for $200,000). On driving past the house,
I remarked to the person beside me ``I wonder what rent he has to charge
to break even?'' To which the said individual responded ``that would depend
on how much of a down payment was made.'' Is this true? Briefly explain.
-
79)
-
Consider the standard cost minimization model:
|
min |
C = |
n
å
1 |
wixi
subject to y0 = f(x1
... xn) |
|
-
a.
-
Write out the first and second order conditions for this problem. Is diminishing
marginal product of any input implied?
-
b.
-
Prove that the factor demand functions are homogeneous of degree zero in
prices.
-
c.
-
Using the Conjugate Pairs Theorem, show that these demand functions are
downward sloping in their own prices.
-
d.
-
Explain how you would arrive at the cost function. What does it depend
on? Explain the meaning of this function.
-
e.
-
Define Sij = ¶xi/¶pj.
Explain why these are pure substitution effects.
-
f.
-
In Value and Capital, Hicks, in gory detail, proved the following two results.
-
Can you prove them using modern methods in a couple of lines?
-
g.
-
Defining substitutes as Sij > 0,
and complements as Sij < 0, prove
that it is not possible for all goods to be complements to each other.
-
80)
-
In a two good world, where consumers have fixed endowments of goods rather
than money income, a good can have ¶x1/¶pi>
0 without being inferior with respect to income. T/F Explain.
-
81)
-
If a consumer has a utility function of two goods, U(x1, x2)
= u1(x1) + u2(x2) where both
u1, u2 are strictly concave, then the ordinary demand
for both goods are downward sloping. T/F Explain.
-
82)
-
Consider the production function
| Y = 10[1/3K-a + 2/3L-a]-1/a |
|
what is the elasticity of substitution between K and L?
-
83)
-
Suppose that the indirect utility function is of the form
| V(p1, p2, M) = Mp1-1/3p2-2/3 |
|
-
a.
-
Find the ordinary demand for x1.
-
b.
-
Find the elasticity of demand for xm1.
-
c.
-
Find the expenditure function M*(p,U)
-
d.
-
Find the Hicksian demand for x1.
-
84)
-
``An increase in the diversity of consumers' tastes will increase the cost
of using allocation mechanisms other than the price system.'' T/F Explain.
-
85)
-
Suppose a company offers its employees free parking that would rent for
$200 per month. Unlike the question on the problem set, suppose the company
does allow you to sublet the spot. If the company suddenly decides to charge
$200 per month for the spaces, would we expect any change in the quality
of cars parked in the lot? (If it makes it easier, assume there are only
two kinds of cars: good cars which cost $500 per month to rent, and poor
cars which costs $100 per month to rent.)
-
86)
-
Maria's utility function is U = min(x,y). Maria has $150 and the price
of both goods is $1. Maria's boss is thinking of sending her to another
town where the price of x is still $1, but the price of y is $2. Maria,
familiar with the concepts of EV and CV learned in one of her favorite
courses, pouts and complains bitterly. She claims that although she doesn't
mind moving for its own sake and the new town is just as nice as Vancouver,
the move is as bad as a pay cut of $A. She also says she wouldn't mind
moving if when she moved she got a raise of $B. What are A and B equal
to?
-
87)
-
A government subsidy program reduces the price of aerobic classes from
$50 per unit to $40 per unit. As a result, Adel increases his rate of consumption
of classes from 50 units to 60 units. Adel's gain from the subsidy program
is at least $500 per period, but no more than $600 per period. T/F/U
-
88)
-
``To draw an analogy with the intertemporal problem, the relationship between
the subjective rate of time-preference r and
the market rate of interest r corresponds exactly to the relationship between
the ratio of subjective probabilities pa/pb
and the slope of the asset line l/g.'' T/F/U
-
89)
-
Economists always come up with different names for the same thing (eg.
MV=MRS), ``utility of expected value'' and ``expected utility'' is another
example. T/F/U
-
90)
-
If the income elasticity of current and future consumption is positive,
a decrease in the market rate of interest will have an unambiguous effect
upon the quantity of savings in a two-period model. T/F/U
-
91)
-
Diminishing marginal utility in all goods implies that the marginal utility
of money income is also diminishing with respect to income. T/F/U
-
92)
-
A monopolist producer of light bulbs, will design his bulbs so that they
will have to be replaced more frequently than competitive producers would.
T/F/U
-
93)
-
Let p be the price vector and let E be the minimum expenditure needed to
achieve a utility of V0
-
a.
-
Prove that the rate at which E increases with pi can be expressed
as
-
b.
-
Hence, or otherwise, derive the Slutsky equation for ¶xi/¶pj.
-
c.
-
How must this equation be modified if the individual has an endowment of
x0j units of commodity j?
-
d.
-
``In an endowment economy, if an individual's final consumption bundle
is close to his endowment point, own price effects are negative.'' T/F/U.
Explain.
-
94)
-
Consider a profit-maximizing firm with production function y = f(x1,
x2), which sells its output in a competitive market at price
p. The firm obtains inputs at competitively determined wages w1
and w2, but the factors interact with each other so that an
additional term, pkx1x2, is present in total cost.
The objective function of the firm is therefore:
| p = pf(x1,x2)-w1x1-w2x2-pkx1x2 |
|
-
a.
-
Derive the first and second order conditions. Explain the derivation of
the factor demand equations.
-
b.
-
Is the expansion path for this firm the same as for a firm whose costs
do not include the interactive term? Also, at the profit maximizing point,
does the law of diminishing returns hold for each factor?
-
c.
-
Derive the comparative statics relations for w1. Is there a
refutable implication?
-
d.
-
Are the factor demand functions homogeneous of some degree in some or all
of the parameters?
-
95)
-
Two vendors have shops right next to each other. One sells hamburgers and
one sells french fries. The demand for hamburgers and fries in the two
stores are not independent; that is, greater sales of hamburgers imply
greater demand for french fries and vice versa. In fact, the demand curve
for the two stores can be characterized as
Both firms face horizontal average cost curves with
-
a.
-
Find the Cournot solution for output and prices for both venders.
-
b.
-
Suppose the firms merge, and this has no effect on cost. Suppose also the
merged firm decides to give french fries away for free. What price should
they charge for the burgers to maximize profits?
-
c.
-
In which case are profits higher? Why?
-
96)
-
The following question can be done with only graphs and intuitive answers.
Suppose that risk averse individuals face an uncertain state of the world.
They have $100 that they can invest in money and earn a return (1+r) for
certain, or they can invest in bonds that yield a gain (1+g) in state 1,
and a loss (1-l) in state 2.
-
a.
-
Draw the state-space graph and show the case where the individual is holding
some positive amount of bonds. Make sure you identify the equilibrium holdings
of bonds and money.
-
b.
-
Suppose that r increases. On a new graph, show the new equilibrium. What
happens to the amount of bonds held?
-
c.
-
Going back to the original situation again, suppose that the return g increases.
On a new graph, show what happens to the amount of bonds held now.
-
97)
-
Suppose Jorge is more risk averse than Ramesh. Suppose they both have the
same beliefs about the various states of the world that might exist tomorrow,
and they both face the same prices for state claims. Furthermore, they
both have the same risky state endowment. Given this, Jorge will choose
a less risky consumption bundle. T/F/U. Explain (Hint: a graph will help.)
-
98)
-
Vin has a VM utility function v(c) = ln c and must choose a state-contingent
consumption bundle (c1, ... , cs). The price of a
state-s claim is ps and the Vin's initial endowment has a value
of [`C].
-
a.
-
Solve for Vin's optimum consumption in each state.
-
b.
-
Show that for any pair of states s and s¢:
-
c.
-
What condition defines the state in which consumption is greatest? Least?
-
d.
-
Is the rule derived in (c) true for any concave function v(c)?
-
99)
-
David is a a risk lover, therefore, he will always accept a fair bet. T/F/U.
Explain.
-
100)
-
``The Fisherian model of intertemporal choice is inconsistent with a Keynesian
consumption function Ct = a+bYt, where Ct,Yt
are the levels of consumption and income in a given period.'' T/F/U. Explain.
-
101)
-
Milton Friedman has a saying that ``All goods are perfect substitutes at
the margin.'' What does he mean?
-
102)
-
Flora has earnings of $200 at the beginning of period 0 and expects earnings
of $250 at the beginning of period 1. Bernie has earnings of $150 in both
periods. Neither of them has any other assets, but they can consume less
or more than their earnings in a given period by lending to or borrowing
from the other consumer. The market, in which they do this will have a
single rate of interest r which neither of them influence. Neither of them
cares about what happens after period 1.
-
If CF(0) is Flora's consumption in period zero, and so on, then
the utility functions for Flora and Bernie are:
| uF = CF(0)CF(1);
uB = [CB(0)]2CB(1). |
|
-
a.
-
Write down the present value of each individual's wealth, and their budget
constraints.
-
b.
-
Write down each person's demand function for consumption in period 0.
-
c.
-
Equate the demand and supply curves and calculate the equilibrium rate
of interest.
-
d.
-
In equilibrium, who borrows how much from whom?
-
103)
-
Will elasticities of demand be greater for temporary or permanent price
changes?
-
104)
-
When Edward is faced with prices p1 = 9, p2 = 12
he consumes at some point x0, where x1 = 4,
x2 = 7, U(x0) = 10. When p1 is
lowered to p1 = 8 Edward would move to point x1,
where x1 = 6, x2 = 6, U(x1) = 15.
From these data, estimate the following values:
-
a.
-
How much would Edward be willing to pay to face the lower price of x1?
-
b.
-
How much would Edward, if initially at x1, have to be
paid to accept the higher price of x1 voluntarily?
-
c.
-
Are your answers to (a) and (b) exact, or approximations? If the latter,
what is the direction of the bias?
-
105)
-
The other day on the CBC morning news, there was a story on the new ``super
bacterias''. These are bacteria that are immune to the current anti-biotics.
On the report an expert said ``these bacteria have figured out how to get
around our current medical arsenal.'' What would Alchian say about that
statement?
-
106)
-
Quite often, whenever there is a natural disaster, we hear statements about
how much the disaster cost. Suppose there was a large comet heading straight
for earth. Does it literally make sense to ask the question: ``What is
the cost of a comet hitting the earth''? Why or why not?
-
107)
-
Suppose a firm uses two inputs, and has the following rule for selecting
a level of x2, namely x2 = (w1x1)/w2,
for a given level of output y0 = f(x1,x2).
-
a.
-
What would be the parameters of the cost function for a firm that used
this decision rule?
-
b.
-
What would be the sign of ¶xi/¶wi?
A simple isoquant graph is sufficient to make your point.
-
c.
-
Is the cost function that would result from such a rule cost minimizing?
If not, are there any conditions under which it would be?
-
108)
-
``Marginal cost is the cost of the last unit produced''. True or false,
explain.
-
109)
-
Consider the class of models
|
max
x1, x2 |
y = f(x1,x2) +ax1 |
|
where x1 and x2 are choice variables and a
and b are parameters. Let f(a,
b)
be the maximum value of y for a given a and
b.
-
a.
-
Prove (don't just cite the Envelope Theorem) that fb
= l*x2*, where
l*
is the Lagrange multiplier.
-
b.
-
Derive and explain what comparative static results are forthcoming in this
model, and which are not.
-
c.
-
Prove that
|
¶x1*
¶b |
= l* |
æ
è |
|
¶x2*
¶a |
|
ö
ø |
+x2* |
æ
è |
|
¶l*
¶a |
|
ö
ø |
|
|
-
110)
-
A firm produces one output from two inputs according to the technology
f(x) = x11/3x21/3. The firm
is a price taker on both input and output markets. Find the firm's profit
maximizing factor demand functions and the profit function.
-
111)
-
With w1 on the vertical axis, and x1 on the horizontal
axis, draw the profit maximizing demand curve x*, the cost minimizing
demand curve xc, and the long run zero profit demand curve xL,
when x1 is an inferior good. Provide an intuitive explanation
for the differences in elasticity.
-
112)
-
A bumper sticker reads: ``Real charity doesn't care if it is tax deductible''.
True or false, comment.
-
113)
-
Some simple graphing questions to get you started.
-
a.
-
Draw a graph in utility space, with x2 on the vertical axis
and x1 on the horizontal axis, a set of indifference curves
where x2 is inferior. Now drawing in budget constraints where
the price of good two is changing, derive the Hicksian, Slutsky and Marshallian
demands for x2 in the second graph in price quantity space.
Be sure to label everything carefully.
-
b.
-
In a completely separate graph, draw a Hicksian and Marshallian demand
curve for x1 when ¶x1
/ ¶M = 0, and the nominal price of x1
is on the vertical axis. Now on another graph, graph them if the relative
price of x1 is on the vertical axis.
-
114)
-
Is the function y = x13x23
+ x1x22 homogeneous? Is it homothetic?
Explain
-
115)
-
Show that ¶lu / ¶U0º
¶lm /¶M
×lc, where lu
is the compensated marginal utility of money, lm
is the ordinary marginal utility of money, and lc
is the marginal cost of utility.
-
116)
-
``If average costs are falling then the homogeneity of the production function
must be greater than 1'' True, False, explain.
-
117)
-
``If people are going to stand in line, then we should make their wait
as comfortable as possible. We should provide chairs, shelter, and make
food available to them.'' The following statement was made by a Langley
School Board member in the fall of 1996 as hundreds of parents spent up
to two days waiting to register their children to a particular alternate
school. In the fall of 1997, the advice was taken.
-
a.
-
What do you think happened to the line, and why?
-
b.
-
Were the parents in line any better off? (Be careful and explicit in your
answer.)
-
118)
-
Consider the utility maximization problem, max U(x1, x2)
subject to p1x1 +p2x2 = 1,
where prices have been ``normalized'' by setting M=1. Let U*(p1,p2)
be the indirect utility function, and l be the
Lagrange multiplier.
-
a.
-
Show that lM = (¶U
/ ¶x1)x1*
+(¶U / ¶x2)x2*
-
b.
-
Show that lM = -[U*p1p1
+ U*p2p2]
-
119)
-
In Wing's model of heterogeneous consumers, an increase in diversity of
tastes could increase or decrease the demand for a good.
-
a.
-
Explain this using a graph.
-
b.
-
What would the effect of an increase in diversity have on the total value
of a commodity? How does this relate to part (a)?
-
120)
-
The following is a quote from Silberberg, p. 346. in his discussion of
two-stage budgets and separability. ``It is not the case, for example,
that if the ``subutility'' functions f and g above [these are the subutility
functions in the weakly separable stage 1 utility function] are homothetic
that two-stage budgeting is possible.'' He then gives a function that results
from a homogeneously separable utility map and states that ``clearly ¶xi/
¶pj
¹ 0'', where goods xi and xj
are in different subutility functions. Essentially Silberberg is saying
that this inequality denies two-stage budgeting can take place with a homogeneously
separable utility map. Is he right or wrong? Explain.
-
121)
-
In terms of our utility maximizing model,
-
a.
-
What is the difference between the ``ability to make a choice'', and ``the
willingness to make a choice''?
-
b.
-
When people make statements like ``Joe Blow had no choice, he had to ...
'' what are they really saying in terms of willingness versus ability?
-
c.
-
We design laws that presumably act as deterrents against crime. Is your
answer in (a) and (b) consistent with this? Explain briefly.
-
122)
-
Economics, in the past 30 years, has been applied to such topics as religion,
family life, and animal behavior. It seems silly to suggest that individuals
(whether they are priests, fathers, or rats) are behaving according to
the principle of maximization. What defense does Alchian offer in cases
like these?
-
123)
-
Several years ago, a neighbor of mine was doing some ``funny'' things to
his yard. He killed the trees (but left them standing), planted bamboo,
and generally let the place go wild. My other neighbor was selling his
place, and as I was talking to the real estate agent she said: ``that guy
doesn't care what happens to his place because he inherited it.'' How can
you tell the real estate agent is not an economist?
-
124)
-
Consider a profit maximizing firm with production function y = f(x1,
x2), that sells its output at price p.The firm buys input x1
at a fixed wage w1, but the firm faces an upward sloping supply
function for x2, given by w2 = w20+kx2,
where w1,w20, p, and k are positive parameters.
-
a.
-
Derive the first and second order conditions and explain the derivation
of the explicit choice functions implied in this model. Characterize each
of these choice functions as a demand function, a supply function, or neither,
and explain. Is the ``law of diminishing marginal product'' implied for
each factor?
-
b.
-
Derive the comparative statics results available for the parameter w1.
Are there any refutable implications?
-
c.
-
How will the use of x2 by this firm respond to an increase in
k?
-
d.
-
Are the explicit choice functions homogeneous of some degree in some or
all of the parameters? Show that they either are or are not. What relation,
if any, does homogeneity of factor demand or other similarly derived functions
have to the homogeneity of the production function?
-
e.
-
Find a ``reciprocity'' result involving the parameters w20
and w1.
-
f.
-
Assuming that x2 can be held fixed, explain the meaning of the
following identity:
| y*(w1,w20,p,k)
º
ys(w1,p,x2*(w1,w20,p,k)) |
|
Using this equation, and citing without proof any results you might find
useful, show that the long run supply function is more elastic than the
short run supply function.
-
125)
-
The minimum average cost function is given by AC*(w1,
w2, y0). Find the derivative of this with respect
to y0 and simplify to get an expression for marginal cost. Interpret
this equation.
-
126)
-
Suppose that x1 is an inferior factor.
-
a.
-
What must be the sign of ¶lc
/¶w1? And what must be the sign
of ¶AC* /¶w1?
-
b.
-
Given the sign of the two derivatives, draw a marginal cost curve, and
then carefully graph how the marginal cost curve changes when w1
changes.
-
127)
-
Consider a general minimization problem of the type:
|
min
x1, x2 |
y = h(x1, x2) + ax1.
s.t. g(x1, x2) = k |
|
where a, k are parameters.
-
a.
-
Let f(a, k) be the
minimum value of y for a given level of (a,
k). On a graph with y on the vertical axis and a
on the horizontal axis, plot the functions f(a,
k) and h(x10, x20) +ax10,
where the `0' indicates fixed values. Graphically show the envelope theorem,
and that phiaa < 0 at some appropriate
a0.
-
b.
-
Prove (ie. do not just assert) the following:
-
fa
= x1*(a,k).
-
fk
= l*(a,
k).
-
c.
-
Show that
-
128)
-
Consider an individual endowed with nonwage income Y0 and 24
hours of time per day, who chooses some mix of leisure (L) and income (Y).
Income can be augmented at market wage rate w. The individual maximizes
U(Y,L) subject to the budget constraint Y = w(24-L) +Y0 yielding
the Marshallian demand functions Y = YM(w, Y0) and
L = LM(w, Y0).
-
a.
-
Explain the meaning of the Marshallian demand functions, show explicitly
how they are derived, state any homogeneity that exists, and identify the
indirect objective function. Explain the derivation of the Hicksian demand
curves. What are they functions of, state any homogeneity that exists,
and explain the meaning of the associated indirect objective function.
-
b.
-
Carefully explain the meaning of the following identity:
| LU(w,U0) º
LM(w,Y*(w,U0)) |
|
Using this identity, derive the Slutsky equation for this model. Assuming
leisure is a normal good, derive the signs, if possible, of the terms of
the Slutsky equation.
-
c.
-
Why is the Marshallian demand for leisure not necessarily downward sloping
when leisure is a normal good.
-
129)
-
Suppose Ticket Master is underpricing the tickets to a Spice Girls concert,
and as a result a queue is created. Suppose also that Ticket Master has
restricted each person to purchase at most 2 tickets.
-
a.
-
Describe using the Barzel graph, how the equilibrium price in terms of
time is achieved. (Minor Hint: Be careful to note that the price of the
ticket is not zero.)
-
b.
-
Suppose that Ticket Master decides to increase the number of tickets that
each person can purchase to 4, but that the Spice Girls are still only
going to do one concert. What happens to the price per ticket in terms
of time, and the total time spent waiting in line per person?
-
c.
-
In general, is it true that the individuals in a line are the individuals
with the lowest time cost?
-
130)
-
What is the difference, in a many-commodity model, between diminishing
marginal rate of substitution between any pair of commodities, and quasi-concavity
of the utility function? Which is the more restrictive concept?
-
131)
-
Show that if l = lM(p1)
then ¶x1/¶M
= 1/p1. [Hint: Do not use any matrix algebra!]
-
132)
-
In price/quantity space, show me a graph comparing EV, CV, and CS when
x1 is inferior.
-
133)
-
Mormons are big on education (BYU is the largest university in the US),
Jehovah's Witnesses think the world is ending tomorrow anyway, so why bother
going to college. Both religious groups are growing. Which group do you
think gives more in terms of money to their church, and which one do you
think gives more in terms of time? Briefly explain why.
-
134)
-
It is often said that accountants and dentists make so much money because
their wage reflects the fact that they have a boring job. Suppose the wage
difference between an economist and accountant was $20,000. Under what
conditions would this be an accurate measure of the ``value of boredom''?
-
135)
-
This winter I am going to New York for the American Economic Association
meetings. When I'm there, I'll probably eat at McDonalds. When I eat at
McDonalds at home I always have a Quarter Pounder and a medium fries. When
I eat there in New York, am I more likely to have a ``higher quality''
meal? For example, a crispy chicken sandwich and a large fries?
-
136)
-
Suppose a crazy terrorist builds and explodes several neutron bombs in
the USA killing half of the people, but not damaging any of the physical
capital. What would you predict would happen to the real interest rate?
Briefly explain using a graph.
-
137)
-
The Prime Minister recently defended his low interest policy over a tax
cut. He claimed that a lower interest rate meant a savings of perhaps $400
per month on the average mortgage, while a tax cut may only mean an increase
in income by about $600 per year. He concluded that a low interest rate
policy is better for Canadians than a tax cut. Supposing his numbers are
correct, what little detail is he glossing over? Use a graph in your answer.
-
138)
-
``A certain former Soviet Union tank commander is planning to hold XYZ
stock for at most 5 years. As a result, he should not be concerned
about XYZ dividends after that date.'' T/F/U Explain.
-
139)
-
Consider the following model:
|
min
x |
y = f(x1 ... xn) + |
n
å
i = 1 |
hi(xi,ai) |
|
-
a.
-
Derive any refutable hypotheses from this model.
-
b.
-
Prove the following reciprocity result:
| hiaixi¶x*i/¶aj
= hjajxj¶x*j/¶ai |
|
-
c.
-
Suppose that xn is held fixed at xn0,
its previously maximizing value. Let a¢
= (a1 ...,an-1),
and therefore, define the short run choice function as xsi(a¢,b,xn0).
Using the relevant identity between x*i(a,
b)
and xsi prove the Le Chatelier result
| |¶x*i/¶ai
| > |¶xsi/¶ai
| |
|
-
140)
-
Suppose that the utility function is given by U(x1, x2,
p1). That is, utility depends on the price of good 1, as well
as the quantities. Derive the Slutsky equationfor changes in x1
with respect to p1, and discuss how this differs, if at all,
from the usual Slutsky equation.
-
141)
-
Neil's von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function is un(w) = 7-3w-3,
while Robert's is ur(w) = 3-8e-w
-
a.
-
Find the measure of absolute risk aversion for each.
-
b.
-
Is one globally more risk averse than the other? If the answer is yes,
which one? If the answer is no, explain why.
-
142)
-
Suppose that initially an individual owns $4 and a lottery ticket. The
lottery ticket will be worth $12 with probability 1/2 and worth $0 with
probability 1/2. The individual's VM utility function is u(w) = w1/2
where w is wealth. What is the lowest price at which the individual would
be willing to sell the lottery ticket?
-
143)
-
If U(c1,c2) = pv(c1)
+ (1-p) v(c2) is homothetic, then
the individual has constant absolute risk aversion. T/F/U. Explain.
-
144)
-
``If the quality and quantity attributes of a good are complements or independent,
then the Alchian and Allen ``Shipping the good apples out'' proposition,
holds.'' T/F/U. Explain.