Blaming Beijing EDITORIAL,
SEPTEMBER 3rd, 2003
Unemployment
in America is high, and elections are on the horizon. It must be time
to
look east again for scapegoats. Japan is only starting to recover from
its protracted recession, so China will be handed the role of economic
villain in the coming election cycle. Expect to hear a chorus of
presidential
candidates blame unfair Chinese competition for the nation's
manufacturing
woes.
China's
trading partners do have legitimate grievances, but it would be
irresponsible
and inaccurate for American politicians to pin our economic
sluggishness
on scheming culprits in Beijing.
Exhibit
A of what is alleged to be the perfidy of Beijing's communist rulers is
China's $100 billion trade surplus with the United States. Exhibit B in
the evolving politicized debate, if not the smoking gun proving
Beijing's
unfairness, is China's undervalued currency, the yuan, because an
undervalued
currency makes a nation's exports more competitive. The yuan has been
pegged
at about 8.3 to the dollar for some time. But most economists say
China's
currency would appreciate by as much as a third if allowed to float
freely.
Traveling
in Asia yesterday, Treasury Secretary John Snow heeded political
pressures
back home in exhorting Chinese leaders to let the market price their
currency.
This is a desirable outcome in the long run, but a raft of immediate
caveats
come to mind.
China's
financial system remains fragile, and sudden currency volatility could
lead to a banking crisis that could spell disaster for the world
economy.
Washington would do better to urge China's leaders to focus on their
lack
of preparation to assume their proper role in the world's financial
order,
rather than to demand any supposedly quick fix. Moreover, China's
refusal
to devalue its currency in the aftermath of the late 1990's crises in
East
Asia (much appreciated by its neighbors and Washington at a time when
the
yuan seemed overvalued) adds credence to its leadership's insistence
that
it prizes stability when it comes to exchange rates, not short-term
advantage.
With most economists concerned that China's robust growth could fuel
inflation
and a speculative bubble, there are valid reasons for Beijing to fear a
surging currency.
It
would also be silly to argue that exchange rates, as opposed to cheap
labor
and other factors, are the primary reason Americans buy three-quarters
of their toys from China. Nor does a prospering China, by definition,
cost
America jobs, as the experience of the late 1990's proved. American
politicians
should resist dusting off old complaints about Japan and redirecting
them
at China. This is hardly a case of an exporting nation that is unfairly
protecting its own market. China's imports are growing at a faster clip
than its exports, and the bulk of the exports registering in those
eye-popping
trade figures are goods built in China by the likes of Intel and
America's
automakers.
© NYT
|