[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Intro and wiki



On November 14, 2008, Adam Cody wrote:
>  I found this in bugzilla:

boy, you're fast! ;)

>
>  http://bugzilla.zimbra.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12525

Thanks for that link - I'll make sure to vote for it 

>
>  There's one internal/private comment on it. The relevant part is:
>
>  "The idea is to move towards relocatable packages, with the flexibility to
> store user data in customer designated areas (ie mount points).  At which
> point this user can choose to install in a location compliant to favorite
> OS or Standard. The other half of this is to publish chksums of the
> packages and verify them before installing."

that does solve part of the problem, yes. however it leaves part about 
separation of config/code/data unanswered. but it's a start 

>  What I can do is include a reference to FHS on the server-planning page
> and reference the above rfe number. This way, if there's enough interest
> the rfe will see increased votes & comments.

great idea! In the meantime what are your views on artificially splitting 
install into something more FHS-friendly by symlinking directories to 
appropriate places? 
like /opt/zimbra/log -> /var/log/zimbra, /opt/zimbra/store -> /var/opt/zimbra/store, 
etc. Do you see any immediate problems with that? We've got initial response 
from Zimbra that 

/opt/zimbra/store
/opt/zimbra/log
/opt/zimbra/db

could be symlinked/mounted. Would that be OK for the long run or is there 
something we should know before we do that? (as well as others interested in 
FHS-compliant installs).

>  Maybe it would be worth wild to create a new RFE that will take
> --fhs-strict from the installer. This way zimbra gets installed from the
> start under that standard. I'm unsure if this would have a negative impact
> to some other items though - like the clustering setup. Don't think it
> straight forward and I'm sure there will be some debate on what exactly is
> a "strict FHS" layout.

I think that --fhs-scrict might do the trick. (which of course is highly 
dependent on definition of "strict FHS"). relocating everything into 
typical /etc /usr and /var locations would be ideal, but sticking 
with /opt, /etc/opt and /var/opt would be the middleground to meet FHS 
standard and not disrupt Zimbra installs too much IMO.



-- 
Dmitry Makovey
Web Systems Administrator
Athabasca University
(780) 675-6245

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.