Developing Internet literacy for college bound NNS students

FRIDAY, April 2 8:30-9:30

Ishbel Galloway, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada


Rationale

Increasingly, the WWW is the preferred source of information for undergraduate students' term paper research. It's convenient, it's current, it's easily searchable and yet unreliable content and the weak web literacy skills of NNS students make it an extremely treacherous research source. We need to teach our students the skills required to navigate the web and evaluate its content if they are to become effective users of online material in their college courses.

It is vital to consider your students' particular areas of weakness when planning a web literacy activity. Sites must be chosen that they will find challenging and not just entertaining. I teach almost exclusively students from China and I am stunned by how rarely they recognize humor, bias, or disinformation on internet sites.

Goals

Through this activity students will begin to develop critical skills to determine reliability of a website by determining the following information: 

The Activity

Before going to the lab

Begin with a discussion of research sources in general. When you look at print sources, how do you determine usefulness? In the library, how do you decide if a book or an article is useful to your research? How do you choose journals in an electronic database? Discuss authority, purpose, objectivity, accuracy, currency.

In the lab

Assign pairs of students according to your knowledge of their cultural familiarity and maturity, and direct them to the webpage that you wish them to evaluate. (If you can, do this from an online course page; itŐs much faster if they can access their pages from hyperlinks rather than having to type in the URL.)  You should also provide them with some kind of simple evaluation form that they can take notes on:

Evaluating web pages - in class assignment

Go to the Academic Writing homepage and follow the link for your group. Carefully examine this site together and make notes below.

After about 10 minutes, I will ask you to show this page to the class using the LCD projector and tell us your impressions of the page.

Authority - Who is responsible for this page? What is his/her expertise?

Purpose - What is the motivation for putting this page on the Net?

Objectivity - What is the author's relationship to this material?

Accuracy - Is the information reliable? How can you tell?

Currency - How up to date is the information? How often is new information added?

Sample online activity A and B

After 15-20 minutes, have each pair present their webpage to the class (LCD projector is essential) and have them explain their conclusions. Encourage the other students to ask questions or challenge as the case may be. If they fail to see problems, ask questions to try to steer them in the right direction.

Follow-up

After students have presented their sites and the clues to unreliability have been identified, students can be directed to any one of a number of online internet literacy tutorials to review what has been discussed (see list of tutorial sites below).

Students then evaluate some sites that they might use for whatever current research assignment they are working on, using an online evaluation form. Again there are a number of these online at various tutorial sites. You can also create your own (download sample here). Note that it is important to explain that major media, corporate and government sites are not appropriate for this assignment.


FINDING SAMPLE WEBSITES

There are dozens of websites that can be used for this activity. However, it is important to choose sites that you believe will challenge your students. Their cultures of origin and familiarity with North American culture, especially its humor, must be carefully considered.

RESOURCES

 

Bibliography

http://www.lib.vt.edu/research/evaluate/evalbiblio.html

http://www.alltheweb.com/help/faqs/url_investigator

Tutorials

http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/Evaluate.html

http://www2.widener.edu/Wolfgram-Memorial-Library/webevaluation/webeval.htm

http://www.library.ucla.edu/libraries/college/help/critical/

http://www.library.cornell.edu/olinuris/ref/research/webeval.html

http://www.library.jhu.edu/elp/useit/evaluate/

http://www.slu.edu/departments/english/research/

http://lib.nmsu.edu/instruction/evalexpl.html

 http://core.lib.purdue.edu/

 PPT Tutorials

http://sosig.ac.uk/desire/internet-detective.html

http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/SearchPPT_files/frame.htm

   Humor/satire Websites
http://147.129.226.1/library/research/AIDSFACTS.htm

http://www.bonsaikitten.com/

http://www.genochoice.com

http://www.theonion.com/

http://www.buydehydratedwater.com/http://www.mcwhortle.com/           

http://www.dhmo.org

   Hoax Websites
http://www.improb.com/

http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoaxsites.html

http://www.sree.net/tips/hoax.html

http://www.shsu.edu/~lis_mah/documents/TCEA/hoaxtable.html

http://www.d303.org/schools/scn/stcnlrc/evalutingwebsitesmoreparttwo.htm 
 Advocacy/objectivity Sites
http://www.nrlc.org/http://www.naral.org/

http://www.navs.org/

http://www.msf.org/

http://www.nra.org/

http://www.martinlutherking.org/

http://www.rethinking.org/aids/index.html

http://www.ihr.org/

http://www.beefnutrition.org/

http://www.jeremiahproject.com/halloween.html