FPA
367-2007 Seminar in Visual Art II Thursday 09:30 - 12:20 HC 1505 Judy Radul |
|||||||||||||
1. Jan 11 Class 1: The Functions and Disfunctions of “Theory” FOCUS: Introduction to Class Work and Assignments Review terms used last semester: Dialectic, Negation, Affirmation The Significance of Theory:
Terry Eagleton—In Class Handout Reserve Reading (On Line) Video Interviews on line at Tate Modern (Britain) archive: http://www.tate.org.uk/onlineevents/archive/ For Reference: Artist's Writing "1000 Words" in Artforum: 1000 WORDS: CATHERINE SULLIVAN 1000 Words: Liam Gillick and Philippe Parreno A Thousand Words: Thomas Hirschhorn
|
|||||||||||||
2. Jan. 18
Summarize the notions of Pop described in the interview using a concept map Artists discussed: Martin Kippenberger: SFMOMA , db magazine Quotes from Greenberg's "Avant Garde and Kitsch" , 1939
It has been in search of the absolute that the avant-garde has arrived at "abstract" or "nonobjective" art -- and poetry, too. The avant-garde poet or artist tries in effect to imitate God by creating something valid solely on its own terms, in the way nature itself is valid, in the way a landscape -- not its picture -- is aesthetically valid; something given, increate, independent of meanings, similars or originals. Content is to be dissolved so completely into form that the work of art or literature cannot be reduced in whole or in part to anything not itself. But the absolute is absolute, and the poet or artist, being what he is, cherishes certain relative values more than others. The very values in the name of which he invokes the absolute are relative values, the values of aesthetics. And so he turns out to be imitating, not God -- and here I use "imitate" in its Aristotelian sense -- but the disciplines and processes of art and literature themselves. This is the genesis of the "abstract."(1) In turning his attention away from subject matter of common experience, the poet or artist turns it in upon the medium of his own craft. ................ Ultimately, it can be said that the cultivated spectator derives the same values from Picasso that the peasant gets from Repin, since what the latter enjoys in Repin is somehow art too, on however low a scale, and he is sent to look at pictures by the same instincts that send the cultivated spectator. But the ultimate values which the cultivated spectator derives from Picasso are derived at a second remove, as the result of reflection upon the immediate impression left by the plastic values. It is only then that the recognizable, the miraculous and the sympathetic enter. They are not immediately or externally present in Picasso's painting, but must be projected into it by the spectator sensitive enough to react sufficiently to plastic qualities. They belong to the "reflected" effect. In Repin, on the other hand, the "reflected" effect has already been included in the picture, ready for the spectator's unreflective enjoyment.(4) Where Picasso paints cause, Repin paints effect. Repin predigests art for the spectator and spares him effort, provides him with a shore cut to the pleasure of art that detours what is necessarily difficult in genuine art. Repin, or kitsch, is synthetic art. |
|||||||||||||
3.Jan 25 Class 3: The Dialectic in Process/Issues of Conceptual Art
|
|||||||||||||
4. Feb. 1 Class 4: Postmodernity, Beyond Dialectic: Jameson’s Cognitive Mapping
Summarize Jameson using the “What it says/What it does” model.
Pay attention to topic sentences |
|||||||||||||
5. Feb 8
Yve-Alain Bois "Whose Formalism?" Donald Judd excerpts from "Specific Objects" (see email) Cargo and Cult: The Displays of Thomas Hirschhorn. Benjamin H.D. Buchloh. Artforum Clement Greenberg. "The Necessity of "Formalism" on JSTOR from New Literary History. Reference All Things Being Equal: Isa Genzken
ESSAY TOPIC/OUTLINES/BIBLIOGRAPHY DUE
|
|||||||||||||
6. Feb 15 In class discussions about Roundtables. One to one meetings about essay topics.
|
|||||||||||||
7. Feb 22 Class
7: “Design
and Crime” & “This Funeral is For the Wrong Corpse” Hal
Foster |
|||||||||||||
8. Mar 1
|
|||||||||||||
9. Mar
8 John Roberts: "Pop Art, The Popular and British art of the 1990s.” Library in “prof copy binder”
|
|||||||||||||
10.Mar 15 I)
SECRECY AND PUBLICITY: SVEN LÜTTICKEN II) Andreas
Huyssen" High/Low in an Expanded Field" (sign
in to the "Project Muse" database through the SFU Library) Please bring all readings to class as some class time will be given to roundtable preparation. March 20 SFU: Roundtable on Neo-Pop
|
|||||||||||||
11. Mar 22
At Alexander Center 12:30 Roundtable on Form
|
|||||||||||||
12.Mar 29
Readings from March Artforum
|
|||||||||||||
13. April
5
ESSAYS DUE: SUBMIT THROUGH EMAIL (PREFERRED) to: jaradul@sfu.ca OR INCLUDE A STAMPED SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPE. LATE ESSAYS NOT ACCEPTED |
|||||||||||||
Course Assignments The paper should not exceed
3500 words. Late papers will not be accepted. No exceptions without
a doctor's note. In groups the third year seminar
will be responsible for identifying a theme relevant to critically
engaged studio practice and presenting a noon hour disucssion (with
readings and visuals) open to all students at the SFU Alexander Center.
|