Competing Conceptions
of Modern Selfhood: Native Ethnologist Yanagita Kunio and the Meiji-Taishô
Literary Community
Yanagita Kunio (1875-1962) is considered by most scholars,
first and foremost, as the founder of minzokugaku, or "native ethnology." In his youth, however,
he was a bungaku seinen (literary
youth), closely befriended with a number of young authors who would later
become key members of the Shirakaba (White Birch) School. These shizenshugisha (Naturalists), such as Tayama Katai and Shimazaki Tôson,
are those who would develop the so-called I-novel (shishôsetsu), an often autobiographical genre that commonly emphasizes
the inner thoughts and feelings of an individualized protagonist.
Yanagita is often characterized as having bidden farewell to the literary
world during his university years: not only did he condemn the confessional
narcissism of his peers' novels, but he also apparently abandoned literary
form in his own writings. Though his early collection of folktales, Tôno
monogatari (Tales of Tôno, 1909) is often considered "literature,"
it is often evaluated by native ethnologists as an indication of Yanagita's
growing interest in fact rather than fiction. By fashioning himself a collector
of folklore, a simple reteller of stories, rather than as a poet, Yanagita
distanced himself from his literary compatriots, whom he felt were engaged
more with representation of the self (themselves?) than with addressing contemporary social concerns.
While
the problem of the modern self, or kindai jiga, is commonly at the center of discussions on the development of modern
literature, Yanagita's minzokugaku,
with its focus on the historical tradition of the "folk," is usually
not included as part of this discussion. However, by trying to preserve oral
tradition, Yanagita had a motive not so different from his literary peers: his
purpose in rewriting the past was to configure history as raw material for
(re)building communal identity. I propose that the dividing line between literature
and social science, despite what Yanagita may have argued, does not devolve to
a distinction between fantasy and reality. Rather, the Naturalists' attempts at
realism, and Yanagita's project to narrativize folk history, both have at their
root the desire to represent the modern self. The debate that develops is
between alternate versions of reality: whether the self should be a clearly
delineated and isolated individual, or a member of a largely homogenous group that
shares cultural, and therefore personal, history.
By examining Yanagita's early work, notably Tôno monogatari and Nochi no karikotoba no ki (A History of Hunting Terms, 1908), in tandem with the novelistic works of his peers, I will illustrate that though the ways self-identity in these works are constructed may seem to have little in common, they in fact engage themselves with the same fundamental problem: where does the self end, and the other begin?