ENSC 406 Tutorial: Week Two
 

Engineering Profession in British Columbia and Canada

 

APEG-BC

The following is paraphrased from Guidelines for Professional Excellence, January 1994, The Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of BC.

 

The Association of Professional Engineers in British Columbia was constituted by the Engineers Act of 1921, which was enacted to form a self-regulating profession that would protect British Columbians from unqualified practitioners. The other provinces in Canada have similar legislation and associations, also with the primary function of registering and licensing professional engineers.  A more recent act, the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of the Province of British Columbia (APEG-BC), registers and licenses professional geoscientists as well as professional engineers.

 

In keeping with the responsibilities of the APEG-BC and the position of trust and

accountability afforded its members, the association created a code of ethics that expresses the standard of ethical conduct expected of professional engineers and sustained by “fundamental values adopted over many generations . . . and given public expression in the increasing number of significant works affecting society.” According to APEG-BC, its members must maintain excellence in practice while attending to

  • the health, safety, and well-being of the public
  • the protection of the environment
  • the fair administration of the Act and the Code of Ethics
  • the enhancement of the profession

Each member must do so while maintaining “a position of respected prominence in society world-wide and be recognized for their valuable contributions.”

 

CCPE

 

The Canadian Council of Professional Engineers (CCPE) is made up of the provincial associations. Like its members, CCPE is concerned with increasing public awareness and appreciation of the engineering profession and engineering work. But its most critical function is maintaining standards for engineering education and accrediting undergraduate engineering programs in Canada. The council also develops policies and negotiates agreements to ensure national mobility of professional engineers and to improve international mobility. It also undertakes research in areas of engineering education and the profession and engages in public relations activities.

 

Homework to complete before the Jan 12-15 tutorial

 

Read Chapter 1 of Engineering Ethics and answer the following questions:

  1. What does the Ford Pinto case suggest about the nature of engineering ethics?
  2. How are ethical dilemmas like engineering design problems? Provide an example.
  3. Describe a situation that might be legal but unethical and another that would be illegal but ethical.
  4. Fledderman suggests that two important ethical issues are raised by the Space Shuttle Challenger case. What are they? Can you identify at least one more issue?
  5. In the Challenger case, we learn that Jerald Mason, a senior manager with Thiokol, told Bob Lund, the vice president for engineering, to “Take off [his] engineering hat and put on [his] management hat.” Why did this phrase become famous?

 

Read the APEG-BC Code of Ethics, which is the last page of the bylaws.

 

Read Chapter 2 of Engineering Ethics and answer the following questions:

  1. What differences do you note between the engineering profession in Canada and the US?
  2. Do you agree with the following statements Fledderman makes on page 19 of the first and second editions?

    Although they are professionals, engineers do not yet hold the same status within the society that physicians and lawyers do. (1st ed.)

    . . . engineering is still clearly a profession, albeit one that is not as mature as medicine and law and that should be striving to emulate some of the aspects of these professions (2nd. ed.)

    Explain why you agree or disagree.
  3. Can you identify 6 ways in which codes of ethics assist engineers?
  4. List the relevant facts for the Intel Pentium Chip case. What items in the code of ethics are violated?
  5. List the relevant facts of Competitive Bidding and the Paradyne Case. What items in the code of ethics are violated?