- About CEE
- In-person instruction: Some classes have already returned
- 813,000 Zoom meetings: How IT Services handled the move to remote instruction
- This math lecturer developed her own open textbook—now thousands of students are using it
- Three students talk about academic integrity
- A different perspective on academic integrity
- Painting the bigger picture of academic integrity
- National Day of Remembrance and Action on Violence Against Women
- Reflections on Inclusion in the Classroom Week
- Fostering connection and practicing kindness
- Can you teach dance remotely?
- A student’s perspective: How two instructors created connection online
- Welcome to your new Zoom classroom
- Kevin Lam: “Students appreciate every little thing we do that shows that we care”
- Sheri Fabian: “I embraced a flexible approach”
- Sarah Johnson: “The biggest change I made was to switch to asynchronous delivery”
- Nicky Didicher: “I’m finding my job less exhilarating”
- Mark Lechner: “You have to be OK with things going sideways”
- Nienke van Houten: “They really valued my clear and upfront approach”
- How can we support remote instruction at SFU?
- Crowdmark: A more efficient way to grade student assessments
- The unexpected benefits of a shorter syllabus
- Photo gallery: Talking shop at Teaching Matters
- Watch the video: Faculty members discuss SFU's new instructor-led online course model
- Bridges and booster rockets: CEE's new senior director talks about teaching support
- Meet the Centre for Educational Excellence leadership team
- A biology instructor rethought her students’ role—and her own
- Photo gallery: SFU’s 24th Annual Spring TA/TM Day
- Photo gallery: SFU's 9th Annual Winter Warm-up
- If you build it, will they come?
- “My students didn’t look like they were having fun”: Three additions to the TA/TM Stories podcast series
- View the furniture, share your thoughts—online
- An upgraded Canvas Gradebook is coming in January
- Share your thoughts on the furniture in SFU classrooms
- DEMOfest presenter slides
- Photo gallery: 5th Annual DEMOfest
- Teamwork needs to be taught
- TA/TM Stories: Three new podcasts explore the teaching experiences of grad students
- Can it be done? A math instructor attempts to indigenize her course
- Answers to your questions about SFU's new approach to online education
- Photo gallery: The CEE Open House
- Do you know your faculty teaching fellow?
- Instructor-led online courses: How one faculty member prepared for the new model
- Photo gallery: SFU's 34th Annual Fall TA/TM Day draws a crowd
- Connecting people and crossing artificial divides: An interview with Elizabeth Elle
- Sessional instructors can now be included in online course evaluations
- Don't say this to your class—a student shares his experience
- How one lecturer is using podcasts to make course concepts more real in her online course
- Photo gallery: Rain, burgers and smiles at the 2019 President's Employee BBQ
- Five questions and answers about the creation of CEE
- A redesign made this course more engaging for students—and the instructor
- CPUTL: A graduate student describes her experience
- CEE Staff Login
The Certificate Program in University Teaching and Learning: A graduate student describes her experience
By Mark Bachmann, Teaching and Learning Centre
Originally posted on February 07, 2017
When Mirjam Gollmitzer applied to the Certificate Program in University Teaching and Learning (CPUTL) in 2015, she already had quite a bit of experience as a TA and sessional instructor. But Gollmitzer, a PhD student in the School of Communication, was noticing a shift in the expectations of search committees and employers. “Job market requirements [had] changed,” she says. “Increasingly they were asking for credentials and training, not just experience.”
That observation led Gollmitzer, who had never received any formal training in teaching, to look into the CPUTL program. The 13-week part-time program, delivered by SFU’s Teaching and Learning Centre, is designed for graduate students and postdoctoral fellows interested in pursuing a post-secondary teaching career.
Gollmitzer says the program gave her a framework and tools for approaching her role in the classroom—“I definitely wanted to learn strategies for more participatory learning and more variety”—but beyond that, it provided her with “a dedicated time and space to reflect on [teaching].”
Before the program, she says, “I had no language to capture what I was actually doing in the classroom.” Just as significantly, she had “no one to talk about it with.” The certificate program provided her with both, and expanded her conversational circle in the process.
“It was truly interdisciplinary,” says Gollmitzer. “You meet people from other departments and you learn about teaching methods there.”
She cites the positive contributions of the facilitators as well. “Sarah [Louise Turner, an educational consultant with the Teaching and Learning Centre] and Shauna [Jones, a senior lecturer in the Beedie School of Business] are a pretty great combination and bring different things to the program. They created an open and empathetic space.”
Real change in the classroom
So what impact has the program had on her teaching?
“I’m a lot more participatory [now],” says Gollmitzer. “I can explain to my students what I’m doing. There’s a kind of transparency that I didn’t have before.”
That change has had an effect on her students as well. “Students are a lot more understanding and open and willing to put effort into the course when they understand the pedagogical goals, the why.”
The impact on her work opportunities is more difficult to quantify, but Gollmitzer cites indicators suggesting the credential has made a difference: “I am not sure if it is because of the certificate program, but my department at SFU has hired me continuously as a sessional instructor since completing the program, including two courses that I had not taught before. Because of CPUTL and the pedagogical toolkit provided by the program, I felt confident applying to teach these undergraduate courses that I had expertise in, but that fell outside of my immediate area of research specialization.”
A word of advice
Gollmitzer offers some counsel to anyone considering the program.
“The work is manageable, but you do have to dedicate yourself,” she says. “It requires that you are honestly interested in your students and becoming a better teacher. It’s not like a regular grad course.”
She believes the program would be most beneficial for individuals who already have some experience as teaching assistants or instructors and want to build on that foundation in a deliberate—and formally recognized—way.
“It’s a thing that makes you stand out.”