- About CEE
- Three students talk about academic integrity
- A different perspective on academic integrity
- Painting the bigger picture of academic integrity
- National Day of Remembrance and Action on Violence Against Women
- Reflections on Inclusion in the Classroom Week
- Fostering connection and practicing kindness
- Can you teach dance remotely?
- A student’s perspective: How two instructors created connection online
- Welcome to your new Zoom classroom
- Kevin Lam: “Students appreciate every little thing we do that shows that we care”
- Sheri Fabian: “I embraced a flexible approach”
- Sarah Johnson: “The biggest change I made was to switch to asynchronous delivery”
- Nicky Didicher: “I’m finding my job less exhilarating”
- Mark Lechner: “You have to be OK with things going sideways”
- Nienke van Houten: “They really valued my clear and upfront approach”
- How can we support remote instruction at SFU?
- Crowdmark: A more efficient way to grade student assessments
- The unexpected benefits of a shorter syllabus
- Photo gallery: Talking shop at Teaching Matters
- Watch the video: Faculty members discuss SFU's new instructor-led online course model
- Bridges and booster rockets: CEE's new senior director talks about teaching support
- Meet the Centre for Educational Excellence leadership team
- A biology instructor rethought her students’ role—and her own
- Photo gallery: SFU’s 24th Annual Spring TA/TM Day
- Photo gallery: SFU's 9th Annual Winter Warm-up
- If you build it, will they come?
- “My students didn’t look like they were having fun”: Three additions to the TA/TM Stories podcast series
- View the furniture, share your thoughts—online
- An upgraded Canvas Gradebook is coming in January
- Share your thoughts on the furniture in SFU classrooms
- DEMOfest presenter slides
- Photo gallery: 5th Annual DEMOfest
- Teamwork needs to be taught
- TA/TM Stories: Three new podcasts explore the teaching experiences of grad students
- Can it be done? A math instructor attempts to indigenize her course
- Answers to your questions about SFU's new approach to online education
- Photo gallery: The CEE Open House
- Do you know your faculty teaching fellow?
- Instructor-led online courses: How one faculty member prepared for the new model
- Photo gallery: SFU's 34th Annual Fall TA/TM Day draws a crowd
- Connecting people and crossing artificial divides: An interview with Elizabeth Elle
- Sessional instructors can now be included in online course evaluations
- Don't say this to your class—a student shares his experience
- How one lecturer is using podcasts to make course concepts more real in her online course
- Photo gallery: Rain, burgers and smiles at the 2019 President's Employee BBQ
- Five questions and answers about the creation of CEE
- A redesign made this course more engaging for students—and the instructor
- CPUTL: A graduate student describes her experience
- CEE Staff Login
Crowdmark: A more efficient way to grade student assessments
By Mark Bachmann
This story was first posted on the Teaching and Learning News blog on October 17, 2017. It is reposted here with minor revisions and updated links.
“It’s way less work.”
That statement explains why mathematics lecturer Brenda Davison is enthusiastic about Crowdmark, an “online collaborative grading platform” that makes it quicker and easier to grade student assessments.
Crowdmark was developed at the University of Toronto to facilitate the grading of large numbers of exam papers by multiple graders. Davison and a number of other SFU instructors, primarily in Mathematics and Biological Sciences, were part of a pilot project to evaluate the tool. In September 2017, the University acquired a site license that makes Crowdmark available to all SFU instructors and academic departments.
Crowdmark is essentially a system for processing digital copies of tests, exams and assignments. Paper-based assessments can be uploaded to the system as scanned images by departmental staff, Document Solutions, or even students using a smartphone camera. Each page of each student’s assessment receives a unique QR code so that specific pages or questions can be assigned to specific graders.
Grading can be done on a laptop computer or a tablet. Graders can easily add comments and annotations, and the tool automatically adds up the points from each question and calculates grades.
Time savings and unanticipated benefits
For Davison, a primary benefit of Crowdmark is that it saves time. She estimates that her TAs devote 30 percent fewer hours to grading than previously, but says the real savings come from the automation of the logistical and administrative tasks that accompany grading. For example, the time spent on activities like sorting names alphabetically and passing papers from one grader to the next has been “drastically reduced.” Reaction from her TAs has been “overwhelmingly positive.”
Davison also cites unanticipated benefits.
“I’ve cut down the re-marking requests by probably 90 percent,” she says, because students are less inclined to challenge grades when digital images of submitted assessments exist. As well, exam pages no longer go missing, and storage of paper exams in case of grade appeals is no longer necessary now that digital copies are available.
Crowdmark provides her with meaningful measures and statistics that she can act on. For example, Davison can compare the grading standards of different TAs and she can see at a glance which questions are causing the most difficulty for her students. Finally, grades can be shared with students immediately via a link or exported to Canvas at the push of a button.
Although Davison’s assessments generally use a short-answer format, she feels the tool could work for longer formats, including essays: “I do not see what would be any different than marking on paper.”
Instructors and academic departments interested in trying Crowdmark are invited to contact the Centre for Educational Excellence at email@example.com.