Fall 2017 - PHIL 105 D100

Critical Thinking (3)

Class Number: 3460

Delivery Method: In Person

Overview

  • Course Times + Location:

    Sep 5 – Dec 4, 2017: Mon, 12:30–2:20 p.m.
    Burnaby

  • Exam Times + Location:

    Dec 14, 2017
    Thu, 12:00–3:00 p.m.
    Burnaby

Description

CALENDAR DESCRIPTION:

An introduction to the evaluation of arguments as they are encountered in everyday life. The central aim will be to sharpen skills of reasoning and argumentation by understanding how arguments work and learning to distinguish those which actually prove what they set out to show from those which do not. Open to all students. Student with credit for PHIL XX1 may not take this course for further credit. Q/Breadth-Social Sci/Sciences.

COURSE DETAILS:

The extent to which we succeed as responsible thinkers, consumers and citizens depends upon at least two skills: how well we analyze and evaluate what we are told by others and how clearly and consistently we think about how to succeed in achieving our individual goals. How else can you avoid being taken in by deceitful politicians, corporations and others who want something from you? And how else might you ensure that the decisions you make are really rational and free from manipulation? The primary aim of this course is to reflect and improve upon these two skills. These skills crucially depend upon our ability to understand the nature of evidence. What counts as good evidence for the truth of some claim? Can evidence ever be deceptive? What is the best way to evaluate complex (or even simple!) explanations of everyday phenomena? How should I adjust my beliefs in light of new evidence? Even if my beliefs about the future are rational, what role do my desires play in determining what course of action to take? These shall be some of our guiding questions, and along the way we shall consider many more.

We shall begin at the beginning: by considering the nature of arguments. We shall consider what makes for a good argument, but we shall also consider a range of poor but deceptive arguments. With this background in the basic tools of critical reasoning, we shall explore a number of its applications: causal reasoning, the confirmation of hypotheses, and reasoning about probability, value and decision-making. By the end of the course, students should be equipped to think clearly about, and to evaluate, fundamental claims and methods in all areas of academic inquiry and in their own day-to-day lives.

COURSE-LEVEL EDUCATIONAL GOALS:

PHIL 105 may be applied towards the Certificate in Liberal Arts, the Quantitative Requirement, and the Breadth-Social Sciences Requirement OR the Breadth-Science Requirement (but not both; student can choose which Breadth requirement to satisfy and plan enrollment in other courses accordingly).

Note
: PHIL 105 has replaced PHIL XX1. If you have taken PHIL XX1 in the past and you enroll in PHIL 105, it will be considered a repeat.

This course is part of the FASS Forward pilot initiative that seeks to offer first-term students in 100-level courses in FASS with free, one-on-one tutoring. Up to 500 students from 12 pre-selected courses will receive 3 hours (6 half-hour sessions) of tutoring in addition to the support normally offered in each course. The students will be randomly chosen and participation is voluntary. 

Grading

  • Five short assignments: 4% each 20%
  • Fass Forward Initiative Participation 5%
  • A midterm examination 30%
  • A final examination 45%

Materials

REQUIRED READING:

Hacking, An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic. ISBN: 9780521775014

Registrar Notes:

SFU’s Academic Integrity web site http://students.sfu.ca/academicintegrity.html is filled with information on what is meant by academic dishonesty, where you can find resources to help with your studies and the consequences of cheating.  Check out the site for more information and videos that help explain the issues in plain English.

Each student is responsible for his or her conduct as it affects the University community.  Academic dishonesty, in whatever form, is ultimately destructive of the values of the University. Furthermore, it is unfair and discouraging to the majority of students who pursue their studies honestly. Scholarly integrity is required of all members of the University. http://www.sfu.ca/policies/gazette/student/s10-01.html

ACADEMIC INTEGRITY: YOUR WORK, YOUR SUCCESS