Summer 2018 - EDUC 816 G033

Developing Educational Programs and Practices for Diverse Educational Settings (5)

Class Number: 6972

Delivery Method: In Person

Overview

  • Course Times + Location:

    Location: TBA

Description

CALENDAR DESCRIPTION:

Investigates theories and issues associated with developing educational programs and practices in various educational contexts. Addresses the development of new programs and their implementation in schools and other educational settings.

COURSE DETAILS:

Meeting Dates:
May 4th & 5th
July 3rd-6th inclusive
Location: Katzie and Kwantlen Territories; Stave Lake Watershed; Malcolm Knapp Research Forest & BCIT Woodlots Maple Ridge (the July dates are “on-trail” with overnights spent at a base-camp)  

This course is designed to be an experience in and of Place-conscious and Ecological Practice (PEP) while also providing an opportunity for the teacher-learners to step out of the experience and reflect upon the process. The goal is that this will allow teacher-learners to get a “feel” for PEP and to expand their understandings of the philosophical, relational, pedagogical, and curricular work involved in its creation. Situated in the teacher’s “home” teaching locales with most, if not all, of the instructional time spent outside, this learning experience will entail “real world” encounters with the pragmatics of this form of teaching and an extended opportunity to build comfort therein. Teacher-Learners will be asked to do a series of activities focused on: deepening their relationship to and knowledge of these places (e.g. microsites, flora and fauna identification/story telling/food sourcing/etc., etc.), building their curricular tools (e.g. planned lessons, emergent lesson planning, etc.), and expanding their pragmatic skills (e.g. developing safety protocols, creating local operating procedures, risk management, and basic outdoor skills).

Maple Ridge MEd Program
This program is a response to growing interest amongst educators, parents, and students in place-conscious, nature-based, ecological learning. It will support teachers in providing frameworks, strategies, and approaches to integrate nature-based learning in their practice. Teachers will be introduced to the philosophical underpinnings of place-conscious learning, and will be encouraged to develop ongoing relationship with specific places and communities as a foundation for personal and professional practice. The ethics and values embodied in these relationships will sustain the development of civic responsibility in the context of environmental/ sustainability issues. As a key content course for the nature-based component of the program this course is designed to challenge and support the teachers into building upon their current understandings and practices with regard to nature but also grow their thinking and pedagogies. This course is structured so that the teachers are able to experience PEP class as students and then become reflective practitioners as they examine their own offerings, those of their fellow students, as well as the course as a whole. Teachers will be invited to deepen their sense of nature as a place for learning, as a means for learning, and as a partner in learning.

COURSE-LEVEL EDUCATIONAL GOALS:

This course has three key educational goals:
A)   To assist the students in the ongoing practice of engaging in, learning from, and building relationship with the natural world. Significant research and experience in the field has shown that it is important for teachers who are wanting to expand their place-conscious and ecological pedagogical practice develop and deepen their own connections to and knowledges of the natural world.
B)   To assist the teachers in developing their pedagogical practices in relation to the natural world. This component is divided into two sub-categories. The first has to do with learning the pragmatics of spending more time outside with students. This will include but likely not limited to: risk management, safety skills and protocols, paperwork (e.g. Emergency Action Plans, Local Operating Policies and Procedures, etc.), on site assessments, etc. The second sub-category will focus on the development of curriculum and implementation of pedagogy in outdoor settings. This will include but likely not limited to developing skills in areas such as: place-based education, ecological practices, emergent learning, integrated curricula, local flora and fauna awareness, outdoor education, nature as co-teacher pedagogy, etc.
C)   To assist the teachers in developing their nature-based philosophies of education. This component will focus on examining and re-examining deeper philosophical beliefs and ways of “doing education” that help and/or hinder each specific teacher’s own nature-based practice. This work will likely involve rethinking and reworking concepts, and resulting practices that arise therefrom, such as: the nature of knowledge and meaning-making, the implications for assessment, the concept of relationality, the changing ways of being, the challenges of crossing the human/nature divide, the difficulties of negotiating cultural change, etc.  

This course’s focus is on deepening our nature-based practices as educators and as a result there are three key topics each coupled with a series of guiding questions.
A)   The place itself. This course will help to develop and deepen our relationships with the place we live and work. Key questions might include: how well do I know who and what live here? How they interact? And, what they are able to offer to my practice and my students? B)   The differences between place-conscious and ecological teaching and learning and what is currently known, explicitly and implicitly, as public education. Key questions are likely to revolve around careful analysis of everything that is taken for granted both in the larger culture of public education and within each student’s own practices as educator. What is present and absent? What is education? How does knowledge work? What needs to change, and what supports do I need, if I am going to truly embrace the idea that nature might be a co-teacher?
C)   Preparing for place-conscious and ecological teaching. Key questions might include: What are my own skills and knowings with regard to nature and the place I teach? How might these grow? What are the needs and requirements of my district, my principal, my parents, and my students with regard to PEP? And, how does taking PEP seriously influence and affect my practice, my curriculum, and the concepts that undergird these?

Grading

NOTES:

GRADING, TASKS/ASSIGNMENTS, and EXPECTATIONS:

Step #1: Students are to arrange yourselves into five equal sized groups (4 or 5/group). These groups forthwith will be named: Trees/Shrubs, Ferns & Fungi, Flowers/plants, Mosses/Lichens & Rocks, Birds & Insects, they will be their eating, back-country, travel, local knowledge, and safety groups.

Small Groups Projects
A)   Food/Gear: The group will operate as the planning/arranging/organizing/care center. Pretend it is just your group going out into the back-country which means you need to have everything you would need for 4 days for a group your size. Amongst the 4 or 5 of you, you will menu plan for the trip (think about lunch on Tuesday through to after lunch on Friday … remember snacks, spices, allergies, food requirements, emergency meal, etc … and remember group gear. Emergency Action Plan: Each group will send their group’s Emergency Action Plan by June 22th at 5pm (earlier is better!). The purpose of this plan is to give everyone some practice putting these things together. They are becoming more standard in public education (they have long been required in outdoor programs) and help us to think through as many contingencies as possible. They also can help parents to better understand that we know what we are doing and they do make a difference in a court of law. Thus, in this plan you should include: group information, medical information, emergency phone numbers, and an action plan in case of an emergency (this might be a layered plan depending upon the level of the emergency). These action plans vary but usually also include the phone numbers, when to contact, and access points for hospitals, ambulance, fire, search and rescue, police, etc. We advise you to seek out rich examples on the internet and to bear in mind the actual paperwork that your school/school district might require. And … here are some SFU examples (but seek out others as well!) … Risk Assessment Tool (attached) and Non-Classroom Activities Guide: https://www.sfu.ca/content/dam/sfu/srs/risk/indemnities/Non-Classroom%20Activities%20Guide.pdf  Safety and Risk Services: https://www.sfu.ca/srs/contact.html
B)   Local Operating Procedures/Protocols: Also due June 22th at 5pm (or earlier!) this paperwork is intended as a description of what might be encountered in this specific backcountry (e.g. hazards, food preparation, water collecting, travel issues, etc.) and how you as a group will deal with them. These are not so much meant to be hard and fast rules that cover every possible situation but they should give an overview of how you are thinking about responding to the most likely issues and provide a kind of ethos for safety, etiquette, and ways of being in the back-country for your group. Again the internet, SFU, and your school districts will have myriad examples for you to draw from. If done well these can become operating documents for future use.
C)   Knowledge of 15-25 of group’s namesake category: Each member of your group will become an expert in three or four of your namesake’s local representatives. Thus, if you are in say Trees/Shrubs then thinking about Yellow Cedar, Billberry, and Creeping Snowberry might make sense whereas Goji berry and Huon Pine don’t really (remember we will spend most of our time above and beyond the BCIT woodlot into Kwantlen Land Management (Stave watershed) at various altitudes (a wee hint there!). Once you have your three or four then your job is to become an expert in them. This might include: various names (local, Latin, indigenous), scientific categories (relatives, history, order/genus/species), uses (medicinal, food, structural, etc.), stories, current state, etc. This should be prepared for before on trail because your job will be notice and share what you have learned with others in a somewhat spontaneous (nay emergent) manner. There is pretty good evidence that most of us can identify and name way more corporate logos then we can living things that live around us … we are going to change that a bit!

Note: the goal of B & C is to give you experience in thinking through this process so it comes readily when you have to do it for your institutions/situations. Make them work well for you.
 
Step #2: Individual Preparatory Work for the course.
           
A)   A place-conscious and ecological learning lesson (pedagogical offering) … each of you is asked to prepare something to present/do with the class in the woodlot over the course of our four days together. The goal is to push yourself into trying something you have never tried but something that being in this program has caused you to consider. Please consider leaving time for feedback from the group in regards to the pedagogical offering and we do encourage the taking of risk herein. Changing practice is hard work and requires each of us to step beyond our comfort zones.
B)   Reading: the idea here is to immerse you in some of the interesting place-conscious literature and some of the educational conversations going on around it. The goal is that this reading will add grist to the mill and build on what you have already done.

Step #3: Evening Dialogues …  
One last component that we are proposing for our time together is a series of evening dialogues where we gather after having eaten and had a good day to dialogue amongst ourselves on some topic/idea/challenge that we as a group think really needs further chewing on. We are naming them dialogues because that is the format that we think aligns itself best with this kind of work. The first evening we will offer a quick overview of dialogue along with some of the understood “ground-rules” but we think/know the content will come from our own experiences, histories, the readings, our shared time, etc. Some possible dialogue topics that I have curried are: What counts as Place-conscious and Ecological Education?, Emergent Learning (what is it? Structure thereof? Limits?)? The agency of nature and its more-than-humans and the implications for teaching?

GRADING REQUIREMENTS:            
Grading for this course will be related to completion of the requested activities, risks taken to push one’s practice, engagement with the work of others, in the dialogues, and in response to the offerings of the natural world. More information will be provided during the first weekend.

Materials

MATERIALS + SUPPLIES:

A comprehensive gear list and other information for our time in the hills will be provided on the first weekend.

REQUIRED READING:

Zimmerer, R. W. (2014). Braiding Sweetgrass. Minneapolis, MN: Milkweed Editions.  
ISBN: 978-1-57131-356-0

Jickling, B., Blenkinsop, S., Timmerman, N., & De Danann Sitka-Sage, M. (in press … instructors will provide). Wild Pedagogies: Touchstones for renegotiating education and the environment in the Anthropocene. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
ISBN: 978-3-319-90176-3

RECOMMENDED READING:

Abram, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more- than-human world. Toronto: Vintage Books.

Dillard, A. (1974). Pilgrim at Tinker Creek. Toronto, ON: Bantam Books Inc.

Others (for future consideration):

Books:      

Berry, W. (2004). That Distant Land. New York: Shoemaker and Hoard.  

Bookchin, M. (2005). The Ecology of Freedom. AK Press.  

Bowers, C. (1997). The Culture of Denial. SUNY Press.  

Callicott, J. B. (1989). In Defense of the Land Ethic. SUNY.  

Davis, W. (2009). The wayfinders: Why ancient wisdom matters in the     modern world. Toronto, ON: House of Anansi Press Inc.  
Evernden, N. (1999). The Natural Alien. U of T Press.  

Lachapelle, D. Deep Powder. (n.d.). Kivaki.  

Leopold, A. (1989). The Sand County Almanac. Oxford Univ. Press.  

Norberg-Hodge, H. (2000). Ancient Futures. Rider press.  

Orr, D. (2004). Earth in Mind. Island Press.

O’Sullivan, E. et al. (2004). Leaning Toward an Ecological Consciousness. Palgrave.  

Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental culture: The ecological crisis of reason. NY: Routledge.  

Sale, K. (1985). Dwellers in the Land: The bioregionalist vision. Sierra Club Books.  

Shepard, P. (1982). Nature and madness. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.  

Snyder, G. (1998). The Practice of the Wild. North Point Press.  

Sobel, D. (1993). Children’s Special Places. Zephyr Press.  

Sobel, D. (2008). Children and nature: Design principles for educators. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.

Thoreau, H. D. (1995). Walden. New York: Dover.  

Warren, K. (2000). Ecofeminist Philosophy. Rowman & Littlefield.

Papers:

Basso, K.H. (1986). Stalking with stories: names, places and moral narratives among the western Apache. In D. Halpern (Ed.), On nature (pp. 95-116). San Francisco, CA: North Point Press.         

Blenkinsop, S. (2005). Martin Buber: Educating for Relationship. Ethics, Place, and Environment, 8(3). 285-307.  

Blenkinsop, S. & C. Beeman. 2010. The World as Co-teacher. Trumpeter, 26(3), 27-39.  

Gruenewald, D. 2003. The Best of Both Worlds: A Critical Pedagogy of Place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3-12.  

Grunewald, D. (2003). Foundations of place: A multidisciplinary framework for place conscious education. American Educational Research Journal, 619-654.  

Jardine, D.W. (1998). Birding lessons and the teachings of cicadas. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 3, 92-99.  

Louv, R. (2009, December). Do Our Kids Have Nature Deficit Disorder? Health and Learning, 67(4), 24-30.         

Naess, A. 2005. The Basics of Deep Ecology. The Trumpeter, 21(1), 61-71.     

Simpson, L. (2002). Indigenous Environmental Education for Cultural Survival. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 7(1): 13.

Smith, G. 2002. Place-based Education: Learning to be where we are. Phi Beta Kappan, 83, 584-594.       

Styres, S. (2011). Land as first teacher: A philosophical journeying. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 12(6): 717-731.  

Weston, A. (2005). What if teaching went wild? Abridged version. Green Teacher, 76:8-12.

Websites/Videos:

Antioch’s Centre for Place-Based Education: www.antiochne.edu/anei 

Children and Nature: www.childrenandnature.org

Environmental Learning: British Columbia Ministry of Education: http://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/education-training/k-12/teach/teaching-tools/environmental-learning  

Environmental School Project: Place-Based Imaginative and Ecological Education in Maple Ridge, BC: http://es.sd42.ca/  

Evergreen Canada: www.evergreen.ca/en

Forest School Canada: http://www.forestschoolcanada.ca/  

GreenLearning.ca: http://www.greenlearning.ca/  

Habitat Conservation Trust Foundation: http://hctfeducation.ca/  

National Environmental Education Foundation: https://www.neefusa.org/

National Wildlife Federation: www.nwf.org

The Centre for Ecoliteracy: http://www.ecoliteracy.org/

Imaginative Ecological Education: http://ierg.ca/IEE/

Graduate Studies Notes:

Important dates and deadlines for graduate students are found here: http://www.sfu.ca/dean-gradstudies/current/important_dates/guidelines.html. The deadline to drop a course with a 100% refund is the end of week 2. The deadline to drop with no notation on your transcript is the end of week 3.

Registrar Notes:

SFU’s Academic Integrity web site http://students.sfu.ca/academicintegrity.html is filled with information on what is meant by academic dishonesty, where you can find resources to help with your studies and the consequences of cheating.  Check out the site for more information and videos that help explain the issues in plain English.

Each student is responsible for his or her conduct as it affects the University community.  Academic dishonesty, in whatever form, is ultimately destructive of the values of the University. Furthermore, it is unfair and discouraging to the majority of students who pursue their studies honestly. Scholarly integrity is required of all members of the University. http://www.sfu.ca/policies/gazette/student/s10-01.html

ACADEMIC INTEGRITY: YOUR WORK, YOUR SUCCESS