• Satisfactory/Unsatisfactory

NOTES:

Grades for each will be determined by two ETLD faculty members.

REQUIREMENTS:

To achieve a grade of S (satisfactory), evaluators must agree that the students’ work meets all of the following criteria:  

Design Rationale Document:

• The target audience and context of use are clearly identified
• The problem of learning which the design addresses is non-trivial and convincingly documented (through assessment conducted by the student, through research literature, or both)
• Learning objectives are clearly articulated
• The design integrates technology tools that are practical in the intended context of use and whose affordances are appropriate for the problem of learning addressed
• Artifacts (e.g., web site, videos, lesson/unit plans) are submitted on time and in good order for assessment (i.e. no broken links, invalid logins or software bugs that interfere with a thorough evaluation)
• Design rationale are discussed in detail, with explicit and appropriate links to principles and concepts introduced in at least three of the preceding core courses
• Planned learning activities directly support achievement of intended learning objectives
• Choice and use of technology tools meaningfully support the planned learning activities and intended learning outcomes
• A practical plan for assessing learning is included (e.g. evaluation rubrics or quizzes)
• The length limit is respected
• Current APA formatting conventions are followed           

Presentation: Presentation is well organized, clearly delivered, and effectively communicates the target audience, problem(s) of learning to be addressed, the thinking behind the design, and plan for assessment of learning. Key design artifact(s) are demonstrated, and the time limit is respected.