File created by user 'asyncjobs_user' at Thu Oct 19 16:28:56 202
RespondentID
Treatment over incarceration
Addiction needs to be punished
HR education makes drugs acceptable
Safe injection makes neighbourhoods unsafe
Decrim takes away law jobs
Safe supply needs treatment after
Charges and fines don't stop drug use
HR treats addicts with dignity
Decriminalizing makes it easier to seek treatment
Naloxone encourages riskier drug use
Addiction is treatable
Punishing users makes them less likely to seek help
HR allows addicts to inject in public
Hard drug users need access to treatment
Drug addiction is an illness
Addicts should not consume in public
Naloxone prevents overdose deaths
HR makes us safer by reducing infectious disease
I support clean needles to stop infections
Addiction result of personal weakness
HR condones and thus normalizes drug use
Legal penalties promote responsibility
HR ensures people who need services get them
Addiction is genetic
Decriminalizing makes users more willing to seek help
People can overcome addiction by willpower alone
Strict drug policies needed to prevent crime
Safe injections sites help users get help
Safe injection sites reduce death from toxic drugs
Criminalizing drugs fuels illegal markets
Education and prevention better than punishment
HR leads to fewer needles in public places
Drug addicts morally weak
Decriminalizing decreases stigma of drug users
Drug users should get services without judgement
Safe supply means taxpayers buy drugs for addicts
HR most morally acceptable approach
HR doesn't address root cause of addiction
Addiction result of broader social problems
Drug decriminalization leads to drug-related violence
Supervised injection should be provided service
Harsh punishment maintains law and order
HR just makes drugs more accessible
Punitive approaches keep needles out of playgrounds
Drug testng kits give false sense of security
Society must not coddle drug users
Drugs are inherently harmful
Addiction cannot be treated
Supervised injection just brings more drug addicts
People who use drugs have to deal with consequences
Punishing doesn't get people off drugs
Drug decriminalization restores trust with police
HR connects users with other resources
Addiction is a personal choice
Governments should NOT support HR.
HR saves lives
Supervised injection should be available.
Legal access to drugs will reduce crime
People addicted to hard drugs commit crimes
HR should get government funding
Decriminalization reduces burden on CJS
Sending addicts to prison keeps them off streets
Methadone just substitutes one addiction for another
Minimizing harm should be focus of policy
Incarcerating users just perpetuates problems
Drug decriminalization leads to rampant drug use.
HR doesn't address personal responsibility
HR just means addicts get free drugs
Prison is the best way to help users
Addiction is a disease
HR should be central health policy
Education about HR should be in schools
Long jail tme will deter drug use
Recognizing rights of addicts means the rest of us pay
Hard drug users should get free needles
Users deserve compassion instead of condemnation
Users should face legal consequences for their choices
Strict laws & harsh penalties deter drug use
Crimnalization does not deter drug use
Tough drug policies protect communities
Punishing users impacts margiunalized groups
Users should be forced into treatment
Any comments on survey?
Self reported position on drug policies
Has anyone close to you (a family member or someone else close to you) ever been dealing with issues of drug addiction?
What is your Gender?
When were you born?
What is the highest level of school you have completed or the highest degree you have received?
Ethnicity Indigenous?
Ethnicity Asian?
Ethnicity Black?
Ethnicity Hispanic?
Ethnicity White?
Ethnicity No Answer?
Ethnicity Other?
Other (please specify)