|
Hi All,
This discussion is long overdue.
We have known for quite a while that the mental health resources available for students at SFU -- many of whom are living far away from family -- are hopelessly inadequate. I believe Health Services currently has one psychologist to handle all affective disorders. This includes very serious cases that may not quite meet the threshold for a clear and present danger to the student's life.
My understanding is that other Canadian schools (like Memorial) have been far more pro-active in experimenting with ways to safeguard the most vulnerable members of their student body.
Having a better-trained and more sensitive faculty would, I agree with Prof. Scott, be a step in the right direction. But no matter how much better trained we become the fact remains that we are not Health-Care professionals. Speaking personally, I experience a terrible, sinking feeling whenever I intervene in the lives of very depressed and distressed students. I have no relevant qualifications. I get involved when they reach out only because they have so few available medical options on Campus, and in Vancouver more generally. Most of them don't even have GP's.
Best,
Sam Black
Sam Black Assoc. Prof. Philosophy, SFU From: Jamie Scott <jkscott@sfu.ca>
Sent: October 14, 2018 1:17:18 PM To: Nancy Forde Cc: David Macalister; James Fleming; academic-discussion (academic-discussion@sfu.ca); englprofs-l@sfu.ca Subject: Re: Incident Oct. 3 Dear folks
I should add that MBB has had to develop its own policy on what profs should do when there’s a suicide. Lisa Craig did this on her own, as MBB’s UCC chair, and with feedback from the administration. SFU’s administration doesn’t have such a policy; it
said it’s working on one last spring, but, to my knowledge, nothing has been circulated to the faculties yet. These issues, regarding the lack of continuity around students’ safety & security across campus, should be addressed ASAP.
I’d like to point out that the SFU administration has dedicated $3M/year x 3 years on the “student experience”. Most of the planning for it was done by the administration in collaboration with students. From what I can tell, none of its working groups
are focused on “professional development” of faculty & staff around the student experience, and creating consistent policy/governance regarding students across campus.
Currently, the “cultural” perspective on students, and their role & rights in the university varies hugely across academic & research units. Most units don’t have constitutions defining their governance, nor where students fit into the local “culture”
of a unit. Tenure-track faculty are typically not trained to teach, nor are any faculty or staff taught ethical behavior in dealing with students, or how to deal with problems they may be facing, including their security.
In applying for grants these days, I routinely have to pass “professional development” learning modules on how to treat collaborators, study subjects, and animals ethically.
Similarly, SFU could make some 1-time expenditures to develop consistent policy and implementation strategies around how we, as faculty, staff & contract workers, can enhance the student experience by acting in well-articulated, shared practices & attitudes
that are consistent across campus. That professional development should include training on the issues of security that have arisen recently.
There is an “extra” working group for “ideas too good to ignore” http://www.sfu.ca/student-experience-initiative/key-action-areas.html Perhaps, if people were interested,
this avenue could be explored through that working group opportunity...
Sorry for the long rant!
Best to you all
Jamie
Sent from my iPhone
Jamie K. Scott, MD, PhD
Professor
Dept. Molecular Biology & Biochemistry and Faculty of Health Sciences Simon Fraser University Burnaby, BC V5A1S6 Canada Office phone: (778) 782-5658 Cell: (604) 782-1814 Email: jkscott@sfu.ca
|