|
Dear Mike, thanks very much for these cogent arguments. I will confess in my research I missed this point: “If you are thinking of working beyond 65 at SFU, perhaps working Is this really true? How can this be – 65 is no longer a meaningful retirement number legally. For those of who consider working part time for another couple of years, how are we exactly disadvantaged? Can one
of the SFUFA experts answer this please? Lyn Bartram, Ph.D. Associate Professor From: Lyn Bartram <lyn_bartram@sfu.ca> Dear Mike, thanks very much for these cogent arguments. I will confess in my research I missed this point: “If you are thinking of working beyond 65 at SFU, perhaps working Is this really true? How can this be – 65 is no longer a meaningful retirement number legally. For those of who consider working part time for another couple of years, how are we exactly disadvantaged? Can one of the SFUFA experts answer
this please? Lyn Bartram, Ph.D. Associate Professor From: Michael Monagan <mmonagan@sfu.ca> If you are thinking of working beyond 65 at SFU, perhaps working |