[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: For Graduate Chairs: letter on graduate student funding levels at SFU



Dear all,
         I've a slightly different take on this, and it may prove unpopular. 

I truly am uncomfortable of us - the professoriate - thinking of 'the University' as some entity separate from us. We're not merely employees of a corporation. We are precisely what makes this entity sufficiently different from a company so as to merit its own Ministry, its own laws and its own model of collegial governance.  So when we ask 'the University' to do something (and in the case of student funding, it's key that we do), we should also take on the responsibility of *how* to do it. We're asking _ourselves_ the question. 

In practical terms, if I suggest tuition breaks for all grad students (a generous overestimate: 30M in lost revenue per year), I can also point to exactly which other functions and places in the university I'd trim. You may have other ideas. What should get trimmed?

More broadly: We collectively have ceded a lot of the power and responsibility of the professoriate, in not being engaged enough in our part of collegial governance.  How else do we explain 6 Faculty vacancies in Senate? http://www.sfu.ca/content/dam/sfu/senate/membership/Senate%20Membership%20List%20November%202022.pdf 
How many of us actually know how the budget works, and why don't we have more faculty asking pointed questions? SFUFA recently highly deeply troubling developments which will affect us all. We're all busy, and into the vacuum has stepped a large number of administrators who each need salaries, offices and employees. Whose responsibility is it to question this?

Professor Johnson told us, in Senate, that the rise in administrative staff was in response to demands for more services by students and faculty. None of this is revenue neutral. I'll take that at face value. I'll also believe that we really want to pay our grad students better. We'll also be spending lots on the new medical school. What are we willing to do _less_ of, if we'd like 'the university' (ie, us) to do more?

 We could make a compelling argument in support of the GSS motion, if we could demonstrate precisely how to fund it. Here's the budget for 2022/23. I also attach the 
total operating expenses by portfolio (source: Finance).   https://www.sfu.ca/content/dam/sfu/finance/Publication/OperatingBudget/Budget%20Book%202022_23_digital.pdf

cheers, and sorry to be a grump.
Nilima



On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 11:04 AM Behraad Bahreyni <bba19@sfu.ca> wrote:

Dear Edna,

 

GSS may request something, but it does not mean it aligns with reality. In this case, they ask to be paid as an employee, while a typical employee/employer relationship does not exist. A typical NSERC Discovery grant is about $40k/yr, meaning that a requirement for support of $32k/yr plus tuition (i.e., ~$40k/yr) disables many of our researchers from doing the work because they cannot afford other research expenses or cannot have more than one student on the team (and I know that the funding can be supplemented with TAships, etc, but not doubled). Such an approach also makes SFU researchers incompetetive. This especially hurts those of us that need to supplement our federal/provincial funding from other sources, for instance, by making it expensive for the companies to collaborate with SFU researchers.

 

In some departments, the students are hired to do short-term research for the faculty (e.g., data collection) and then go their own ways. Some other departments have many graduate students with external funding. And yet, in some Faculties, notably Applied Science and Science, the students are supported through the research grants of the supervisors and often conduct work along a predefined path as set in the proposal and receive a degree at the end. In these Faculties, many researchers have teams of ten or more graduate students to work on different projects, funded through different agencies (NSERC in our case). It is a bad idea to treat all students/researchers the same. What can help is to share experiences and best practices so that all of us can mould them into the specifics of our School/Department/Faculty. This approach also allows people to test-run ideas at a smaller scale before applying them to all.

 

Cheers

 

 

 

__________________

Behraad Bahreyni, PhD, PEng      
Professor, School of Mechatronic Systems Engineering
Associate Member, School of Engineering Science   
  SFU  Simon Fraser University

MSE 4176, 250-13450 102nd Ave

Surrey, BC, CANADA   V3T 0A3

Tel:  +1 (778) 782-8694           Fax:  +1 (778) 782-7514         Web: http://sense.fas.sfu.ca/

 

From: Enda Brophy <ebrophy@sfu.ca>
Sent: December 1, 2022 10:38 AM
To: academic-discussion (academic-discussion@sfu.ca) <academic-discussion@sfu.ca>
Subject: Re: For Graduate Chairs: letter on graduate student funding levels at SFU

 

Hi all, I’m happy to hear of the support for this initiative. Thanks to those of you who have contacted me and shared this message w your unit’s Grad Chair thus far. 

 

On tuition reductions or waivers, this is certainly the first and most obvious step the university can take. But even a full tuition waiver wouldn’t be sufficient to address the shortcomings in grad student funding, which would still fall well short of the living wage the university has been trumpeting the importance of. 

 

The GSS is requesting $32,000 after tuition deductions for all research-based graduate students, with annual increases, so perhaps Graduate Chairs could publicly support this request.

 

Take care,

 

Enda 

 

 

 

Enda Brophy
Associate Professor and Graduate Chair | School of Communication

Associate | Labour Studies
Simon Fraser University | HC 3559
515 W Hastings St, Vancouver V6B 5K3
E: ebrophy@sfu.ca

Simon Fraser University lies on the unceded territories of the Coast Salish peoples of the xʷməθkwəy̓əm (Musqueam), Skwxwú7mesh (Squamish), Səl̓ílwətaɬ (Tsleil-Waututh) and Kwikwetlem (kʷikʷəƛ̓əm) Nations.



On Nov 30, 2022, at 10:52 PM, Nilima Nigam <nigam@math.sfu.ca> wrote:

 

Dear Nancy and Enda

           I'd happily sign onto any initiative to reduce graduate tuition at SFU. Students in my own department recently surveyed themselves with regards to costs of living. The numbers tell the tale.  Enda's figure of 14K (post tuition) is not anywhere close to enough. A large number of these students are relying on savings or help from family. Independent family wealth should not be a prerequisite for a graduate education.

 

 

thank you

Nilima

 

On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:33 PM Leanne Ramer <lramer@sfu.ca> wrote:

Hi Nancy,

I would like to say that I 100 percent agree.

By Increasing graduate student stipends without a concomitant reduction in tuition, SFU is in effect penalizing faculty and limiting research potential.

It is difficult for me to reconcile such an obtuse position: are we supporting research and innovation or not? If the former, we are in the business of reducing turion fees. It’s a simple equation.

Leanne

Leanne Ramer, PhD, Biomedical Physiology & Kinesiology
Simon Fraser University
lramer@sfu.ca
pronouns she, her

At Simon Fraser University, we live and work on unceded traditional territories of the Coast Salish peoples of the Səl̓ilw̓ətaʔɬ (Tsleil-Waututh), Sḵwx̱wú7mesh (Squamish), and xʷməθkʷəy̓əm (Musqueam) Nations.


From: Nancy Forde <nforde@sfu.ca>
Sent: November 30, 2022 10:00:38 PM
To: Enda Brophy; academic-discussion (academic-discussion@sfu.ca)
Subject: RE: For Graduate Chairs: letter on graduate student funding levels at SFU

 

Hi Enda,

 

Thanks for initiating this discussion.  As the new graduate chair in Physics (and simply as a supervisor of graduate students), I agree that we should be supporting graduate students more, as they are barely scraping by.

 

However, rather than asking SFU to mandate an increase to their stipends (which would have to come from our stagnant-sized research grants), I propose that we ask SFU to reduce their graduate tuition.  As you point out, students need to pay this tuition and ancillary fees from their stipends, which effectively reduces their take-home pay by ~30% (or more, depending on their stipend).  If SFU is serious about helping our graduate students, I would like to see them support students by reducing graduate student tuition, at least for students involved in research-driven graduate programs.  In my opinion, this would be a far more meaningful change than declaring the need for increased stipends and foisting the financial responsibility for this onto faculty supervisors, and would result in the desired outcome of increased take-home pay.

 

I would be happy to support a call for reduced graduate tuition.

 

Best wishes,

Nancy

 

 

--
Nancy Forde [she/her/hers]
Professor | Department of Physics
Simon Fraser University
8888 University Dr.
Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6
--
nforde@sfu.ca | http://www.sfu.ca/fordelab

<image001.png>

 

From: Enda Brophy <ebrophy@sfu.ca>
Sent: November 30, 2022 4:05 PM
To: academic-discussion (academic-discussion@sfu.ca) <academic-discussion@sfu.ca>
Subject: For Graduate Chairs: letter on graduate student funding levels at SFU

 

Dear colleagues,

I’m writing to see if those of you serving as Graduate Chairs would participate in the drafting of a letter to the university administration calling for a timely and meaningful increase in graduate student funding levels. Graduate Chairs in FCAT have already approved this initiative in principle, and we would now like to expand this effort to counterparts across the university. We feel this kind of advocacy is warranted at this point for many reasons, but I will share some of the more obvious ones with you here.

The already high cost of living in Metro Vancouver Metro has risen dramatically in recent years and months. Vancouver’s average monthly rental price for an unfurnished, one-bedroom unit rose to $2,317 in November, an increase of more than $300 since just the beginning of this semester. Inflation is running at around 7% and food prices are up 10% year over year. Tuition costs graduate students roughly $7600 per year.   

In October, Graduate Chairs were sent information on average funding levels from all sources for graduate students across the university. The data was helpful in that it allowed for comparison across units and faculties, but also deeply troubling in the broader perspective it provides regarding the kind of financial support SFU graduate students must make ends meet with. In a nutshell, the information suggests that SFU graduate students receive an average of $21,594 annually from the university.

Clearly this average is skewed by a small number of “high-flier” graduate students who do much better than most, and one must allow for cases in which students pursuing graduate study also have full-time employment elsewhere (and therefore income which isn’t captured in this data). But one must also allow for the fact that the university claws back the aforementioned $7600 per year in tuition, which brings that average total funding figure down to just under $14,000 per year). And, if $21k or so is an average figure, then many graduate students are making much less than this amount per year from university sources. The situation of international students, who in most cases cannot access competitive funding sources like SSHRC, NSRC, etc, would seem to be even more serious (but we are seemingly unable to access this data).

There are two immediate and very serious causes for concern here. The first and most obvious is that as an institution we simply aren’t guaranteeing graduate students dignified levels of financial support during their studies. The second is that the university will ultimately be the biggest loser if these inadequate funding levels persist, since—and I can attest that this is already happening—we will lose out on the best graduate students since they will opt to study at institutions where they are better supported.

To its credit the university has acknowledged that something needs to be done about this situation. In its recent draft Implementation Plan of the (also draft) Strategic Research Plan, the university commits to “study ways to shift our limited resources to better support research graduate students,” promising a “study of tuition waivers, scholarships and bursaries.” The university also commits to “work with SFU Advancement, provincial and federal funding agencies to grow resources available for graduate student support both for existing graduate students and to grow our research graduate student body” and, last but not least, within a year, to “set a university-wide minimum funding level for PhD students.”

It feels as if some public advocacy from Graduate Chairs might be of assistance in nudging the university toward making the best decision possible for graduate students. So, if you are a Graduate Chair and are interested in participating, please do reply to me off-list. And if you think the Graduate Chair in your unit would be interested in this effort, then please do forward this email to them.

All the best,

Enda  

Enda Brophy
Associate Professor and Graduate Chair | School of Communication

Associate | Labour Studies
Simon Fraser University | HC 3559
515 W Hastings St, Vancouver V6B 5K3
E: ebrophy@sfu.ca

Simon Fraser University lies on the unceded territories of the Coast Salish peoples of the xʷməθkwəy̓əm (Musqueam), Skwxwú7mesh (Squamish), Səl̓ílwətaɬ (Tsleil-Waututh) and Kwikwetlem (kʷikʷəƛ̓əm) Nations.

 


 

--

 Nilima Nigam
Professor
Dept. of Mathematics
Simon Fraser University

 



--
 Nilima Nigam
Professor
Dept. of Mathematics
Simon Fraser University

Attachment: SFU_VRA_MATH NIgam.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document