|
Hi Eugene I’ve had the same experience. And not just for my own classes but for those of many other instructors in a program that I direct. Response rates ranging from 25% to a high of 45%. In comparison, in this same program, response rates to paper-based evals distributed in class were in the 82%-95% range. I feel that the online format has made them pretty useless – or at least unreliable, as the samples are probably not unbiased. I don’t feel comfortable assuming that they represent the actual distribution of student sentiment. Andrew von Nordenflycht Beedie School of Business From: Eugene McCann <emccann@sfu.ca> Dear colleagues, Thought I’d use this forum to try to help me understand something going on in my classes and maybe yours too: As of earlier today, only about 15% of students in one of my classes and 20% in another had filled in their Course Evaluations online. That means something like 12 responses have flooded in for two classes with a total of ~75 students.
The rate is much lower than when I used to do these on paper, in person. I have announced the online evals on Canvas, in class, (even with a very clever Bernie Sanders-themed slide, if I do say so myself), and I’ve encouraged the students to do them in class during break. So, is this a common experience? Has the shift to online evaluations reduced response rates significantly? Does there need to be a rethink? Or is it just me? Best, Eugene
_______________________________________________________ |