The History of Cameroon
From archaeological evidence it
is known that humans have inhabited Cameroon for at least 50,000 years,
and there is strong evidence of the existence of important kingdoms and
states in more recent times. Of these, the most widely known is Sao, which
arose in the vicinity of Lake Chad, probably in the 5th century AD. This
kingdom reached its height from the 9th to the 15th centuries, after which
it was conquered and destroyed by the Kotoko state, which extended over
large portions of northern Cameroon and Nigeria. Kotoko was incorporated
into the Bornu empire during the reign of Rabih az-Zubayr (Rabah) in the
late 19th century, and its people became Muslims.
Islam became a powerful force
in the northern and central portions of the country through conquest, immigration,
and the spread of commerce from north and northwestern Africa. The most
significant bearers of this faith, the Fulani, entered northern Cameroon
beginning in the 18th century. The first small groups of pastoralists were
welcomed by the host populations. Eventually the Fulani, frustrated under
non-Muslim rule and encouraged by the teachings of the mystic Usman dan
Fodio, revolted. In the early 1800s Modibbo Adama was appointed by Usman
to lead a jihad over large areas centred in northern Nigeria, which were
incorporated into Usman's Sokoto empire. The Fulani expansion reached its
southernmost point with the conquest of Bamoum, a kingdom founded in the
17th century by Nshare, the son of a Tikar chief. Bamoum was one of the
largest of numerous kingdoms that emerged in the grassland areas of Cameroon
at least 300 years ago. The Fulani conquest was brief and did not result
in Islamization, although this faith was accepted by a later ruler, Sultan
Njoya, in the early 20th century.
Islam was a significant influence
entering Cameroon from the north; other powerful influences entered from
the southern coastal region. In 1472 the Portuguese Fernão do Pó
was the first European to view the Cameroon coast, although Hanno, a Carthaginian,
may have sailed there 2,000 years earlier. Pó was followed by traders,
many of whom were involved in the Atlantic slave trade. Cameroon became
a significant source, with slaves sold and traded at Bimbia, Douala, and
other ports. Routes linked these ports far inland where the Bamileke, Bamoum,
and other kingdoms provided the needed supply of slaves. In the early 1800s
the slave trade declined, and attention turned to "legitimate" trade in
rubber, palm oil, and other items. Earlier Portuguese and Dutch influences
were largely replaced by the British and the Germans.
Christian missionaries were also
becoming a factor. Under the leadership of Alfred Saker, a Briton, and
West Indians such as Joseph Merrick, a Baptist station was established
in 1845 at Akwa Town (now Douala). Saker established a larger post at Victoria
(now Limbe) in 1858. The American Presbyterian mission opened a station
in 1871. The origin and denomination of the missions changed frequently,
but the Presbyterians, Baptists, and Roman Catholics have been the most
important.
In spite of the predominant role
of the British along the coast, in 1884 the Germans claimed the region.
The explorer Gustav Nachtigal arrived in July 1884 to annex the Douala
coast. The Germans moved inland over the years, extending their control
and their claims. Initially, their major dealings were with African traders,
but direct trade with the interior promised greater profits, and colonial
power was used to break the African monopoly. Plantation agriculture was
another major German economic activity. Large estates were established
in southwestern Kamerun to provide tropical produce for Germany. Traders,
plantation owners, and government officials competed for labour, and force
was used to obtain it. The system established was harsh, and many workers
died serving German interests.
In World War I British, French,
and Belgian African troops drove the Germans into exile, beginning a period
of British rule in two small portions and French rule in the remainder
of the territory. These League of Nations mandates (later United Nations
trusts) were referred to as French Cameroun and British Cameroons.
The British trust territory consisted
of a strip of land bisected by the Bénoué River along the
eastern border of Nigeria. British rule was a period of neglect. This,
coupled with the influx of numerous Nigerians, caused great resentment.
The old German plantations--eventually united into a single parastatal,
the Cameroon Development Corporation--were the mainstay of the economy.
Development also occurred in peasant agriculture, especially in the latter
years of British rule. Cocoa, coffee, and bananas saw rapid growth. The French territory had an administration
based on that of the other territories of French Equatorial Africa. Greater
agricultural development took place in French Cameroun. Limited industrial
and infrastructural growth also occurred, largely after World War II. At
independence French Cameroun had a much higher gross national product per
capita, higher education levels, better health care, and better infrastructure
than British Cameroons.
Although there were differences
in the French and British colonial experiences, there were also strong
similarities. Most important, these rulers continued drawing Cameroon into
the international economic system. By the time of independence, the trusts
produced raw materials for European industries but were dependent on Europe,
and especially France, for finished goods. This fragile economy continues
to plague Cameroon.
After World War II, developments
in Cameroon and Europe brought about independence. In British Cameroons
the major question was whether to remain with Nigeria or to rejoin Cameroun.
In a UN-supervised plebiscite in 1961, the south decided to reunify with
French Cameroun to become the Federal Republic of Cameroon. The north voted
to join the Federation of Nigeria.
In French Cameroun the major question
was the type and intensity of the relationship with France after independence.
The first nationalist party, the Cameroon People's Union (UPC) led by Felix-Roland
Moumie and Reuben Um Nyobe, demanded a thorough break with France and the
construction of a socialist economy. French officials suppressed the UPC,
leading to a bitter civil war, while encouraging alternative political
leaders. On Jan. 1, 1960, independence was granted, with Ahmadou Ahidjo
the first president. Ahidjo and his party, the Cameroon Union, pledged
to build a capitalist economy and to maintain close ties to France.
Ahidjo ruled from independence
until 1982. He centralized power in the capital, Yaoundé, and in
one person--himself. Cameroon became an authoritarian, single-party state
in which civil rights meant little. The civil war ended slowly and brutally,
but the state of emergency continued for years beyond its conclusion. Ahidjo
declared nation building to be a major goal, using the fear of ethnic conflict
to justify authoritarianism. Ahidjo's policy of Planned Liberalism
was formulated to encourage private investment, with government to play
a strong role in guiding development. Expansion of export crops was to
provide the foreign capital needed. In the 1973 announcement of the Green
Revolution, the government proposed that the country was to become self-sufficient
in food and to become the primary food source for its neighbours.
The discovery of exploitable petroleum
in the 1970s was a great boost to the economy, and petroleum became the
most valuable export. Petroleum revenues were used to increase prices to
farmers, to pay for imports of materials and technology, and to build financial
reserves. Sadly, petroleum income also paid for expensive, badly planned
projects.
Large-scale industrial development
projects met with little success. Problems in planning, technology transfer,
and market research plagued these projects, and much capital was lost.
There was more success in assisting the growth of agribusinesses and small
and medium-sized enterprises producing goods for local use. But to a large
extent the country still depended on imported industrial goods. Exceptions
to this were refined petroleum products, cement, textiles and clothing,
beverages, and aluminum. Expansion of transportation facilities, the development
of hydroelectric capability, and tremendous growth in education took place.
In 1982 Cameroon underwent a dramatic
political change, and important though less obvious economic changes were
under way. On November 4 President Ahidjo resigned the presidency, and
two days later Paul Biya took power. Ahidjo retained his leadership of
the Cameroon National Union (UNC), the sole political party. The tranquil
nature of the transfer did not last. Ahidjo did not expect to end his domination
of the political system. He wished to keep overall control while turning
over lesser duties to Biya; however, Biya had his own mind. The showdown
took place when Ahidjo tried to assert party domination over the government.
Biya had built a coalition that was sufficient to overwhelm Ahidjo, who
resigned from the party. A minor coup attempt and, on April 6, 1984, a
bloody uprising by the Republican Guard--favoured, if not directed, by
Ahidjo or his supporters--followed. Biya prevailed, and Ahidjo's UNC soon
became Biya's Cameroon People's Democratic Movement. Biya sought the development of
a more democratic society. Although the country was still a single-party
state, he allowed competitive elections for party offices and the National
Assembly. He also experimented with freedom of speech and the press. The
conflict with Ahidjo and the 1984 coup attempt, however, brought back some
of the restrictions of the Ahidjo era.
The economy also presented major
problems. Ahidjo resigned just before a severe economic crisis emerged,
and Cameroonians placed the blame on Biya. The crisis was the result of
international economic conditions and the dependent economy he inherited.
Decreases in commodity prices were harmful. Cameroon's income, dependent
on exports, dropped. In 1987 Biya admitted that the country faced an economic
crisis. A World Bank structural adjustment program and budget cuts were
necessary, and ripple effects were felt throughout the economy. While Cameroon
had made economic progress since independence, it had not been able to
change the dependent nature of its economy. This realization was the cause
of much frustration, and in the late 1980s opposition to the government
grew.
(M.W.DeL.)
Mark W. DeLancey
and H. Mbella Mokeba, Historical Dictionary of the Republic of Cameroon,
2nd ed. (1990), also contains a chronology and an extensive bibliography.
All
photographs copyright Dr. D. Lyons, 2000. All rights reserved.![]()
From Encyclopedia
Britannica.com
Where
is Cameroon?
Early
history
The
mandates
Cameroon
since independence
Bibliography
General histories
include:
Engelbert Mveng,
Histoire
du Cameroun, 2nd ed., 2 vol. (1984-85), a classic work covering prehistory
to independence but concentrating on precolonial and colonial history of
French-speaking Cameroon
Tambi Eyongetah
Mbuagbaw, Robert Brain, and Robin Palmer, A History of the Cameroon,
2nd ed. (1987), a brief, readable introduction emphasizing the colonial
and postcolonial periods
Victor Julius Ngoh,
Cameroon,
1884-1985 (1987), emphasizing French and British colonial rule and changes
since independence
Martin Njeuma (ed.),
Introduction
to the History of Cameroon: Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (1989),
seven essays (five by Cameroonians) discussing selected topics including
trade and politics just prior to colonial rule, aspects of colonial administration,
and the northern lamidates.
German rule
in Cameroon is examined by:
Harry R. Rudin,
Germans
in the Cameroons, 1884-1914: A Case Study in Modern Imperialism (1938,
reprinted 1968), the classic study, relying heavily on documents and official
reports and presenting a report critical of but generally favourable to
the Germans
Helmuth Stoecker
(ed.), Kamerun unter deutscher Kolonialherrschaft, 2 vol. (1960-68),
a revisionist view exposing a more exploitative and harsh relationship
than in Rudin's work.
The best accounts
of political history up to the time of reunification are:
David E. Gardiner,
Cameroon:
United Nations Challenge to French Policy (1963)
Victor T. Le Vine,
The
Cameroons, from Mandate to Independence (1964, reprinted 1977), which
analyzes the effects of French rule and the rise of independence movements,
with some discussion of British rule.
Richard A. Joseph,
Radical
Nationalism in Cameroun: Social Origins of the U.P.C. Rebellion (1977),
a history of the most significant preindependence nationalist movement
in Cameroon, provides an understanding of the origins of many of the domestic
and international political and economic problems of Cameroon.
Mark W. DeLancey,
Cameroon:
Dependence and Independence (1989), provides an analysis of the political,
economic and cultural changes incurred in the colonial and independence
eras.
Mark W. DeLancey
and Peter J. Schraeder (comps.), Cameroon (1986), is an annotated
bibliography of recent publications on history, politics, and economics.
Home