Problems & Discussion

 

Home
Introduction
Background
Data Acquisition
Project Design & Methodology
Problems & Discussion
Metadata
 

The single greatest operational error in my data is derived from the conversion of the data from vector to raster.  This is because raster cells by nature cannot reproduce the exact shape of the vector polygon.  I attempted to reduced this raster stepped effect by choosing a high resolution.  However, my 1 pixel for every 17 meters of ground is significantly higher than original minimum mapping scale of 2 ha.  This creates the illusion of greater detail that does not match the scale of the original data.

Methodological errors are generally derived from my choice of variables for my analysis.  Initially and throughout much of this project, I felt that

 Also, there was also various types of error in my data before I started my analysis.  While the gathering of this particular data followed the industry standard procedures, error was created in all of the stages of the data gathering data.  For example, the forest layer attributes was derived largely from areal photo interpretation, which is subject interpretation error.  While the industry has statistical methods of determining reliability (in this case, attribute accuracy was determined to be > 85%), I can only guess at what kind of errors were propagated and  magnified through my spatial analysis.

As already mentioned, the forest industry as well as the Ministry of Forests utilize far more sophisticated methods of analysis and a greater decision support system than is used here.  Further, I had to use my own intuitive sense to create a reasonable result, due to the lack of information.  For example, crown closure was one of the major factors I used to determine potential logging sites instead of more direct measurements of density and volume.  I initially believed such a fined grained analysis was possible, but the further I got into my analysis and the more I learned about forestry, I realized that this was not possible. 

My analysis would have been more complete had I had a more extensive  road network of the island.  As it was, it included only the major roads on the island, and the vast majority were located a small north west section of the island where most people live.  Forest proximity to a road network is an important variable in determining the cost of timber extraction, proximity of timber areas to roads would have influenced the outcome of my analysis. 

Back to Top
Next
For problems or questions regarding this web contact Stephen Sutherland.
Last updated: November 27, 2000.