Example 28.9: Testing Marginal Homogeneity with Cochran's Q
When a binary response is measured several times or under
different conditions, Cochran's Q tests that the marginal
probability of a positive response is unchanged across the
times or conditions. When there are more than two response
categories, you can use the CATMOD procedure to fit a
repeated-measures model.
The data set Drugs contains data for a study of three
drugs to treat a chronic disease (Agresti 1990). Forty-six subjects
receive drugs A, B, and C. The response to each drug is
either favorable ('F') or unfavorable ('U').
proc format;
value $ResponseFmt 'F'='Favorable'
'U'='Unfavorable';
data drugs;
input Drug_A $ Drug_B $ Drug_C $ Count @@;
datalines;
F F F 6 U F F 2
F F U 16 U F U 4
F U F 2 U U F 6
F U U 4 U U U 6
;
The following statements create one-way frequency tables of
the responses to each drug. The AGREE option produces
Cochran's Q and other measures of agreement for the
three-way table. These statements produce Output 28.9.1
through Output 28.9.3.
proc freq data=Drugs;
weight Count;
tables Drug_A Drug_B Drug_C / nocum;
tables Drug_A*Drug_B*Drug_C / agree noprint;
format Drug_A Drug_B Drug_C $ResponseFmt.;
title 'Study of Three Drug Treatments for a Chronic Disease';
run;
Output 28.9.1: One-Way Frequency Tables
Study of Three Drug Treatments for a Chronic Disease |
Drug_A |
Frequency |
Percent |
Favorable |
28 |
60.87 |
Unfavorable |
18 |
39.13 |
Drug_B |
Frequency |
Percent |
Favorable |
28 |
60.87 |
Unfavorable |
18 |
39.13 |
Drug_C |
Frequency |
Percent |
Favorable |
16 |
34.78 |
Unfavorable |
30 |
65.22 |
|
The one-way frequency tables in Output 28.9.1 provide the
marginal response for each drug. For drugs A and B, 61% of
the subjects reported a favorable response while 35% of the
subjects reported a favorable response to drug C.
Output 28.9.2: Measures of Agreement
Study of Three Drug Treatments for a Chronic Disease |
Statistics for Table 1 of Drug_B by Drug_C Controlling for Drug_A=Favorable |
McNemar's Test |
Statistic (S) |
10.8889 |
DF |
1 |
Pr > S |
0.0010 |
Simple Kappa Coefficient |
Kappa |
-0.0328 |
ASE |
0.1167 |
95% Lower Conf Limit |
-0.2615 |
95% Upper Conf Limit |
0.1960 |
Statistics for Table 2 of Drug_B by Drug_C Controlling for Drug_A=Unfavorable |
McNemar's Test |
Statistic (S) |
0.4000 |
DF |
1 |
Pr > S |
0.5271 |
Simple Kappa Coefficient |
Kappa |
-0.1538 |
ASE |
0.2230 |
95% Lower Conf Limit |
-0.5909 |
95% Upper Conf Limit |
0.2832 |
|
Study of Three Drug Treatments for a Chronic Disease |
Summary Statistics for Drug_B by Drug_C Controlling for Drug_A |
Overall Kappa Coefficient |
Kappa |
-0.0588 |
ASE |
0.1034 |
95% Lower Conf Limit |
-0.2615 |
95% Upper Conf Limit |
0.1439 |
Test for Equal Kappa Coefficients |
Chi-Square |
0.2314 |
DF |
1 |
Pr > ChiSq |
0.6305 |
|
McNemar's test (Output 28.9.2) shows strong discordance
between drugs B and C when the response to drug A is
favorable. The small negative value of the simple kappa indicates
no agreement between drug B response and drug C response.
Output 28.9.3: Cochran's Q
Study of Three Drug Treatments for a Chronic Disease |
Summary Statistics for Drug_B by Drug_C Controlling for Drug_A |
Cochran's Q, for Drug_A by Drug_B by Drug_C |
Statistic (Q) |
8.4706 |
DF |
2 |
Pr > Q |
0.0145 |
|
Cochran's Q is statistically significant (p=0.0144 in
Output 28.9.3), which leads to rejection of the hypothesis
that the probability of favorable response is the same
for the three drugs.
Copyright © 1999 by SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. All rights reserved.