|
Hi Lyn & Julian,
It's correct in the sense that the sum total of what you collect will be likely be smaller because you've collected your pension for fewer years. You don't, of course, collect a smaller yearly annuity if you retire later; in fact your yearly annuity will be higher because you'll have more years to plug into the formula of (years of service)(.02)(average salary for best 5 years).
Best, Ronda
Dr. Ronda Arab Associate Professor of English Simon Fraser University From: Julian Christians <julian_christians@sfu.ca>
Sent: 16 November 2018 16:39:22 To: Lyn Bartram; academic-discussion@sfu.ca Subject: Re: pension plan Hi Lyn
Michael's point is correct. The later you retire after 65, the fewer years you spend in retirement. What you get out of the BCCPP depends on how many years between when you retire and when you die, so if you retire later, you get less. If you work after 65, you do continue to accumulate years of service, so the amount you get when you retire will increase, but this is unlikely to offset the reduced number of years of pension benefit that you will collect. You must start collecting your pension at 71 (https://college.pensionsbc.ca/when-you-can-retire), so I'm not sure what happens if you are still working at 71 (i.e., whether you can collect your salary AND your pension?!?). Cheers Julian ________________________________________ From: Lyn Bartram <lyn_bartram@sfu.ca> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 4:18 PM To: academic-discussion@sfu.ca Subject: FW: pension plan Dear Mike, thanks very much for these cogent arguments. I will confess in my research I missed this point: “If you are thinking of working beyond 65 at SFU, perhaps working part time after 65 at SFU, you lose big. For each year you don't retire you lose a year of your pension in the college pension plan.” Is this really true? How can this be – 65 is no longer a meaningful retirement number legally. For those of who consider working part time for another couple of years, how are we exactly disadvantaged? Can one of the SFUFA experts answer this please? Lyn Bartram, Ph.D. Director, Vancouver Institute of Visual Analytics<http://viva-viva.ca/> Associate Professor School of Interactive Arts and Technology<http://www.siat.sfu.ca/> Simon Fraser University<http://www.sfu.ca/> CANADA v 778 782 7439/8009 f 778 782 9422 m 604 908 9954 lyn@sfu.ca<mailto:lyn@sfu.ca> From: Lyn Bartram <lyn_bartram@sfu.ca> Date: Friday, November 16, 2018 at 4:07 PM To: Michael Monagan <mmonagan@sfu.ca>, "adacemic-discussion@sfu.ca" <adacemic-discussion@sfu.ca> Cc: "nigam@math.sfu.ca" <nigam@math.sfu.ca> Subject: Re: pension plan Dear Mike, thanks very much for these cogent arguments. I will confess in my research I missed this point: “If you are thinking of working beyond 65 at SFU, perhaps working part time after 65 at SFU, you lose big. For each year you don't retire you lose a year of your pension in the college pension plan.” Is this really true? How can this be – 65 is no longer a meaningful retirement number legally. For those of who consider working part time for another couple of years, how are we exactly disadvantaged? Can one of the SFUFA experts answer this please? Lyn Bartram, Ph.D. Director, Vancouver Institute of Visual Analytics<http://viva-viva.ca/> Associate Professor School of Interactive Arts and Technology<http://www.siat.sfu.ca/> Simon Fraser University<http://www.sfu.ca/> CANADA v 778 782 7439/8009 f 778 782 9422 m 604 908 9954 lyn@sfu.ca<mailto:lyn@sfu.ca> From: Michael Monagan <mmonagan@sfu.ca> Date: Friday, November 16, 2018 at 3:59 PM To: "adacemic-discussion@sfu.ca" <adacemic-discussion@sfu.ca> Cc: "nigam@math.sfu.ca" <nigam@math.sfu.ca> Subject: pension plan If you are thinking of working beyond 65 at SFU, perhaps working part time after 65 at SFU, you lose big. For each year you don't retire you lose a year of your pension in the college pension pl |