|
Dear colleagues,
I would like to expand on Michael and Nilima's point #3:
"3:
If you decide to move to a different university/company which is not
This issue is dramatically compounded when one leaves even earlier, because a huge chunk of progress-through-the-ranks component of salary growth is missed. It is not unfair to say that progress through the ranks from age 40 on could raise salary by 50% or even double it -- after inflation (which is accounted for by asset returns under either plan). In other words, consider:
- two colleagues who both join at age 30 - they make equal progress until age 40, when colleague A leaves SFU - colleague B retires at SFU at 65, with salary 1.5 times to twice as high than it was at 40
So B gets 1.5 times to twice the pension claim as A on the years when both paid in the same. Since the overall pensions budget must be balanced, this means that when colleague A leaves at age 40, her pension contributions get raided to the tune of
30-50% and given to colleague B.
Please let me know if this calculation is correct or if I overlooked something important!
If it is correct, I think this is a huge equity issue. People may need to leave SFU young for all sorts of reasons, including: - caring for children or parents - following a spouse out of town - being denied tenure
One more thing to ponder as a union: if we do move to the BCCPP, would there be any way to compensate or mitigate this issue?
Best regards
Lucas Herrenbrueck Assistant Professor of Economics Simon Fraser University http://herrenbrueck.weebly.com |