Hi Eugene,
they are supposed to. Article 8, Section 5 of the Collective Agreement
notes:
Where the University intends to introduce or modify a
policy or procedure that substantially impacts the professional duties,
responsibilities or privileges of Members, it will consult with the
Association, through the Joint Committee, and will consider in
good faith any comments received from the Association. When proposed
modifications to policies or procedures are drafted, the Association
will be provided with copies of those drafts and given
reasonable opportunity to respond.
That said, I suppose there is wiggle room there in that the
University might have decided that allowing themselves to change
definitions in policy without consultation or review would not
"substantially impact the professional duties, responsibilities or
privileges of Members.”
Dan
Hi,
The group that put it together, who I know nothing about
beyond the two who contacted me, have a twitter account too, in case
you’re interested: @democracy_sfu
Beyond all that, I’d repeat something I’ve asked on here
before (something that I think I must not understand about SFUFA’s
relationship to the employer): Why do we get these consultation emails?
Why does the university not have to consult with
us through our union? Their preferred “community” consultation model
(besides the obvious problems with short deadlines) seems to
individualize us. Surely we have a union for this sort of stuff. But,
again, I think I’m probably misunderstanding!
Best,
Eugene
_______________________________________________________
Eugene McCann (he/him/his)
Professor, Geography, Simon Fraser University
Hi all,
Apologies for the interruption. Some of you may be interested
in the proposed revisions to the SFU Policy on Policies. Given that the
university is only offering a one week window for feedback, I figured it
might make sense to highlight the request and share with you my own
concerns about both the timeline for feedback and the revised language
allowing the General Counsel and Unversity Secretary to change the
definitions within policies without review.
Details below. Thanks all,
Dan
Suggested changes to 6.4:
The General Counsel and University Secretary is responsible for approving Eeditorial Aamendments, to
UniversityPolicies, and at their discretion, amendments to
any definitions applicable to a University Policy or
to a University Procedure, and for making
those amendments.