|
|
| APPENDIX E-
CHARTS OF SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS (SAMPLES) |
|
INTERVIEW 1 - SEQUENCE #1 (CALABRIA)
Profile of participant: Matthew
Sex: M Age group: 25-35 Profession: MA Student
(Soundscape)
Knowledge of Commercial Drive: Good knowledge.
Lived near the Drive for one year.
Preliminary hypothesis
Strong emphasis on interaction (voices,
intonations, continuity). Immersion and
emergences. Creation of a dynamic background
(voices, music, sounds from kitchen).
Condensed transcription
I hear sounds of what’s probably a café, I hear
background music, people talking, registers, a
bit of just general commotion and ambiance from
people in activity. It sounds a bit muffled, it
gives me an impression of a dark ambiance, it
reminds me of Vancouver’s weather and how the
clouds give this sort of muffled perspective. It
actually sounds like it’s on the edge, though I
don’t hear any outside sounds. I’d say it’s
local café versus a downtown café (...) But just
because it actually encapsulates sort of my
outer perception of the city, on a macro-level,
so it seems in acoustic term to define the
Greater Vancouver. It’s interesting though that
it’s not what I would perceive a café to sound
like in my memories… Because if I think about it
I would foreground the kitchen and the espresso
machine and the change of money, while those are
more background (...) And also my reference to,
a lot of the other cafés throughout the city are
commercial, so they’re not run by local people,
owned by local people, so it just changes the
whole character of the people who frequent, the
kind of soundmaking that they produce.
“when one doesn’t understand the language,
you’re not drawn to be focused on foregrounding
voices”
Unusual expressions and quotes
“it reminds me of Vancouver’s weather and how
the clouds give this sort of muffled
perspective”
“I would have thought there would be even more
reverberant because there’s so much marble and
tiles in that place.”
“(the sound environment) may act as a catalyst
for being able to go into the mode of distracted
listening and be more focused and directed in
whatever activity I’m involved in”
Attitude of the participant
Very analytical, involved in a thorough
description of the sequence and an active
attempt to try to locate the original location
of the recording. Made strong connections
between the recording and his lifestyle, as a
frequent coffee shops visitor.
Interpretation
The sequence is being interpreted as an icon of
Vancouver’s weather – bringing people inside in
enclosed, saturated spaces. Sense of
“culturalness” of the sequence (music and
voices). Situates himself as an active
participant. Describe the environment, and then
relate it to his experience (from an objective
understanding to a situated reassessment)
Actualisation of hypothesis
Emphasis on the flow of voices and music as a
basic sonic material used to infuse a state of
distracted listening (in relation to the
temporal continuity and the fact that the voices
are hardly understandable). The cultural aspect
of the sequence is heard through the musical
style, and is associated to the multiculturalism
of the drive and the presence of various exotic
cafés and restaurants
|
|
INTERVIEW 3 - SEQUENCE #2 (GRANDVIEW
PARK)
Profile of participant: Lindsay
Sex: F Age group: 36-45 Profession: Sound Artist,
part-time professor
Knowledge of Commercial Drive: Basic. Has recently
moved to Vancouver after living in England.
Preliminary hypothesis
Very alive, sense of variety, strong human and
natural components, feeling of quietness. Openness
(feeling of large space).
Condensed transcription
Very spacious, no sense of being enclosed by big
buildings or anything. There was a lot of human
activity going on, of a relaxed kind, buskers, it
can’t be that small an area because there was at
least two buskers simultaneously at one point.
Very unbritish, thinking of my own experience of
parks. a lot of (kids) seemed to be running around
so maybe a playground or at least an area that was
unthreatening, where they could be just looked
after. It was fairly quiet, overall level, of
course that indicates that the sound is
dissipating… And people called out a couple of
times, people called out to a child for them to
come nearer or something like that, so you could
tell from what they were saying that there was
enough space for someone to be running out of
control, and having to call to get them back
again. But it seems somehow a little more relax
than my experience of city parks… Personally again
I’d be annoyed by the buskers. I liked the birds
songs, I like that you can still hear bird songs
in a urban park or space. You could hear that
people were able to communicate, and there were
quiet conversations and children were able to play
and you can hear birds, I think it was just doing
its job well.
Unusual expressions and quotes
“there was a few conversations, the sort you’d
have with someone standing in a park or whatever.”
“I personally have an aversion to strophic songs
with guitar accompaniment, so for me, it’s
something I wouldn’t have stayed with, but for
many people probably it would be very enjoyable.”
Attitude of the participant
A thorough environmental description with various
personal comments on buskers, kids yelling and the
difference between this park and British parks.
Interpretation
The largeness of the space is clearly heard
through the loudness of the various sounds
(indicating their position), the absence of
reverberation, the softer rumble of traffic…
Soundmaking (both music and kids yelling) provides
a local character to the sequence and encourage
personal judgments.
Actualisation of hypothesis
The presence of natural sounds, various human
soundmaking and the relative overall level are all
indicators of the use of the space to relax and
encourage conversation. Buskers, in particular
provide an important clue of the “publicness” of
the space.
|
|
INTERVIEW 5 - SEQUENCE #3
Profile of participant: Thomas
Sex: M Age group: 46-55 Profession: Writer,
Professor
Knowledge of Commercial Drive: Knows the Drive,
leaves nearby, frequent many establishments
Preliminary hypothesis
Focus on vocal interactions and the busyness of
the location. Traffic predominant, but actively
backgrounded (of contextual sonic clues are
heard and understood). De-localisation,
immersion, niche and wave effects.
Condensed transcription
Yes, I have a sense, I can quite locate exactly
where it is. Because the SkyTrain just came by.
I’m not sure if I’m inside or outside, sounds
like I’m on of these smoking areas in a
restaurant, where you sit outside… I noticed the
traffic more here than in the other recordings,
there were cars wheezing by all the time… it had
a bit of a “markety” ambiance to it, I could
certainly sense that. But of the three
recordings it was the less recording,
comfortable. That could be in a whole number of
places, it’s not typical of this area. Now there
are certain things that are, there’s probably
more voices there, and there’s probably a bit
more indoor / outdoor feel here than there is in
other shopping situations, because of the street
stalls and the market atmosphere. I couldn’t
really locate it so it doesn’t have enough
distinctive qualities to enable me to locate
myself. And I think that’s a pretty important
thing if somebody spends a fair enough time of
the Drive, and I can’t by the recording know
where I am, suggests to me that it’s not a very
distinctive acoustic environment, or otherwise I
would recognise it… So it’s more generic.
Unusual expressions and quotes
“I was put into a position in which I was
guessing a lot of times “where am I?” so I
listened in a different way, trying to situate
where I was rather than “now I know, I’m going
to listen to…” So I’d have actually less memory
of the detail sounds, because I was trying to
locate myself”
Attitude of the participant
Confused at first, trying to identify the
location. Discussed the anonymousness of the
recording, the lack of a dominant feature. Only
briefly commented the sequence.
Interpretation
The sequence is heard as an average urban
environment, with predominant traffic noise and
a strong vocal component. Inside and outside are
still blurry (because of acoustics and the
closeness of voices); that partly helps
identifying the location.
Actualisation of hypothesis
Keynotes are too generic to be automatically
heard; the market does not become an icon in
this case, since it can be easily
misinterpreted. Voices remain central in the
mapping of the space and the evocation of a
local, social space. Strong evocation of opening
(confusion between inside/outside).
©
David Paquette 2004
|
|
|