Spring 2018 - SA 366 D100

Special Topics in Sociology (S) (4)

Food Politics Globalization

Class Number: 7031

Delivery Method: In Person

Overview

  • Course Times + Location:

    Jan 3 – Apr 10, 2018: Wed, 9:30 a.m.–1:20 p.m.
    Burnaby

  • Instructor:

    Gerardo Otero
    otero@sfu.ca
    1 778 782-4508
    Office Hours: Tuesday 1:20 PM-2:30 PM at A.Q. 6187A and Mondays 10:00-Noon at H.C. 7140
  • Prerequisites:

    SA 101 or 150 or 201W.

Description

CALENDAR DESCRIPTION:

Explores a topic in Sociology not regularly offered by the department.

COURSE DETAILS:

Capitalism is full of commodities, but perhaps none as intimate as food. Whether we are aware of it or not, food puts us in contact with a multiplicity of people and institutions, each inserted in a variety of social relations to produce, process, distribute and consume food. Given the wealth of relations generated around food, steeped in social inequality, this is becoming a booming theme in sociology and other social-science disciplines. One of the paradoxes of the contemporary food system is that it generates both hunger and obesity at the same time. Hunger is often blamed on insufficient food production, but given that enough food is produced for everyone, the root cause is in fact inequitable food distribution. Emphasis in this course will be placed on social structures of inequality, both within and between countries in a globalized world. These structures are key determinants of not only whether people have access to food, but also its amount and quality. One of the key driving forces of hunger is, paradoxically, the very technology that was developed purportedly to increase food production. The so-called “Green Revolution,” launched in the 1970s as an alleged solution to Third World hunger, resulted in further social and regional disparities in food availability . . . and increased hunger. Since the 1990s, many have argued that the “Gene Revolution” or biotechnology, specifically the genetic engineering of crops, now holds the contemporary technological solution to global hunger. Can this be true given the social structures of inequality?

COURSE-LEVEL EDUCATIONAL GOALS:

Our general objective will be to gain a greater understanding of the “food system” and globalization though cooperation in this class. Besides our weekly seminar discussions, much of our effort will culminate in the last two sessions, when students will give presentations on their own specific findings. I have high hopes that these presentations will result in considerable teaching and learning effects. Three specific objectives are as follows: 

First, students will get an overview of the main sociological issues on food and globalization. Our major focus will be on how the main foods in the Western or Industrial diet – grains, milk, meat, fruit and vegetables – are produced and under what social conditions. We will explore the links between agricultural technologies, trade, and the reconfiguration of the global agrifood system. This course includes writings from a diversity of scholars – sociologists, a social historian, a journalist, and an anthropologist who is also a medical doctor – so it should be of interest to students from Arts and Social Sciences, Communications, Environment, and Health Sciences.

The second objective to give students a sense of how food production shapes the relations among states in the world economy. The main producers of agricultural inputs and crops, on one hand, and the main distributors and processors, on the other, are all based in advanced capitalist countries, namely in the United States. This fact places many developing countries in a relation of food-import dependency that makes them vulnerable to food insecurity. Within this objective, we will zoom into how fruits and vegetables are produced in the United States and Canada by a predominantly foreign labour force: immigrants from Mexico and Central America, mostly former peasants displaced from agriculture in their own countries.

Finally, our third main goal is to get students engaged in the practice of sociology through bibliographic research. The chief purpose of this research, which should result in a final term paper, is to integrate some of the required course readings with the analysis of a specific sociological food issue in Canada or some other country. Comparative papers on any two countries are also welcome with the instructor’s approval.

Grading

  • Five discussion papers (DPs) x 5% each 25%
  • Five responses (alternate weeks) x 2% each 10%
  • Participation 15%
  • Presentation of draft essay (weeks 12-13) 10%
  • Final essay 40%

NOTES:

Grading
Where a final exam is scheduled and you do not write the exam or withdraw from the course before the deadline date, you will be assigned an N grade. Unless otherwise specified on the course outline, all other graded assignments in this course must be completed for a final grade other than N to be assigned.

Academic Dishonesty and Misconduct Policy
The Department of Sociology and Anthropology follows SFU policy in relation to grading practices, grade appeals (Policy T 20.01) and academic dishonesty and misconduct procedures (S10.01‐ S10.04). Unless otherwise informed by your instructor in writing, in graded written assignments you must cite the sources you rely on and include a bibliography/list of references, following an instructor-approved citation style.  It is the responsibility of students to inform themselves of the content of SFU policies available on the SFU website: http://www.sfu.ca/policies/gazette/student.html.

REQUIREMENTS:

Weekly seminars will consist of a combination of lectures by the instructor, sometimes supplemented by a film, and structured discussion of extensive readings. Lecture themes will supplement those of the readings, provide a broader theoretical or historical context, and make sure that the key concepts and historical issues addressed in the readings are well understood. The seminar part of our class requires your preparation and involvement to further disentangle class materials. Webster's Dictionary defines a seminar as a "group of advanced students studying under a professor with each doing original research and all exchanging results through reports or discussions." Reports, in our case, will be the weekly discussion papers.

Materials

REQUIRED READING:

Deborah Valenza. (2011). Milk: A Local and Global History. New Haven: Yale University Press (Weeks 1-3)
ISBN: 978-0300188127

Bill Winders. (2017). Grains. London and New York: Polity Press. (Weeks 4-5)
ISBN: 978-0745688046

Tony Weis. (2013). The Ecological Hoofprint. London: Zed Books. (Weeks 6-7)
ISBN: 978-1780320960

Stefano Liberti. (2013). Land Grabbing: Journey in the New Colonialism. London: Verso Books. (Weeks 8-9)
ISBN: 978-1781681176

Seth M. Holmes. (2013). Fresh Fruit, Broken Bodies: Migrant Farmworkers in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Weeks 10-11)
ISBN: 978-0520275140

Registrar Notes:

SFU’s Academic Integrity web site http://students.sfu.ca/academicintegrity.html is filled with information on what is meant by academic dishonesty, where you can find resources to help with your studies and the consequences of cheating.  Check out the site for more information and videos that help explain the issues in plain English.

Each student is responsible for his or her conduct as it affects the University community.  Academic dishonesty, in whatever form, is ultimately destructive of the values of the University. Furthermore, it is unfair and discouraging to the majority of students who pursue their studies honestly. Scholarly integrity is required of all members of the University. http://www.sfu.ca/policies/gazette/student/s10-01.html

ACADEMIC INTEGRITY: YOUR WORK, YOUR SUCCESS