|
Chapter Contents |
Previous |
Next |
| HBAR Statement |
data failure1;
length cause $ 16;
label cause = 'Cause of Failure';
input cause;
datalines;
Corrosion
Oxide Defect
Contamination
Oxide Defect
Oxide Defect
Miscellaneous
Oxide Defect
Contamination
Metallization
Oxide Defect
Contamination
Contamination
Oxide Defect
Contamination
Contamination
Contamination
Corrosion
Silicon Defect
Miscellaneous
Contamination
Contamination
Contamination
Miscellaneous
Contamination
Contamination
Doping
Oxide Defect
Oxide Defect
Metallization
Contamination
Contamination
;
Each of the 31 observations corresponds to a different circuit, and the value of CAUSE provides the cause for the failure. These are raw data in the sense that there is more than one observation with the same value of CAUSE, and the observations are not sorted by CAUSE. The following statements produce a basic Pareto chart for the failures:
proc pareto data=failure1;
hbar cause / cframe = ligr
cbars = vigb
cconnect = salmon;
run;
The PARETO procedure is invoked with the first statement, referred to as the PROC statement. You specify the process variable to be analyzed in the HBAR statement. The Pareto chart is shown in Figure 27.1.
|
The procedure has classified the values of CAUSE into seven distinct categories (levels). The bars represent the percent of failures in each category, and they are arranged in decreasing order. Thus, the most frequently occurring category is Contamination, which accounts for 45% of the failures. The Pareto curve indicates the cumulative percent of failures from top to bottom; for example, Contamination and Oxide together account for 71% of the failures. If there is sufficient space, the procedure labels the bars along the vertical axis as in Figure 27.1. Otherwise the procedure numbers the bars from top to bottom and adds a legend identifying the categories.
A category legend is likely to be introduced when
|
Chapter Contents |
Previous |
Next |
Top |
Copyright © 1999 by SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. All rights reserved.