Analysis - IDRISI
We started this project in IDRISI with a 50m DEM of the GVRD.
With this we needed to see where the flat land was. This was
done in a series of steps:
Action |
Picture: (Click on the picture for a
larger detailed image)
|
Comments |
Slope |
|
A slope module was used that calculated the DEM elevation.
The results were in percents where 45° equals 100%. The
largest value we had was 74.37% which is 33.5°. This is
what we are up against on the North Shore. |
A soccer field is anywhere from 90m x 45m which is 4050 sq m
up to 120m x 90m which is 10,800 sq m. It is best to have a 10m
buffer around the field which made the minimum size that I wanted
5000 sq m. I then tried to think of the steepest slope that I
have seen held back by retaining walls at fields to determine
what was the largest slope that I could approve for a new field.
I initially thought a 20% would do but that is a 9° slope.
That means over the 100m length of the soccer field the elevation
can change by 15.8m. This was too great for our purposes. I decided
upon a 10% figure which is 4.5° or an elevation change of
7.9m. This is still a large slope but I believe if we have no
budget constraints it is possible if all other criteria are met.
Reclass 20 |
|
This was my starting criteria. It is here to show what a
large difference a 10% difference in angle makes. |
Reclass 10 |
|
This is the result that was used in all future analysis.
The potential area is less but more realistic. These two screen
shots also show the new window that zooms into only the North
Shore. |
Once we had all the area on the North Shore that was relatively
flat we needed to determine which regions had large enough areas
that we could fit full size fields in. Again we are looking at
a minimum of 5000 sq m.
| Group |
|
Group looks at the individual pixels and determines, by
looking at the cells around it, whether it is part of a larger
"group" or whether it is all by itself. |
| Area |
|
Once we had the groups we calculated area in square meters.
|
| Reclass |
|
The resulting areas were those that had an area of greater
than 5000 sq m and were part of the flat land scenario from
above. |
This was the intermediary step that we then converted to ArcGIS
for analysis there. One thing that was already becoming apparent
was the trend for the flat land to follow creek or river beds
up the mountains. This must be looked at in ArcMap. There is still
many options for our fields. During the Vector analysis there
will be more removed.
The Macro Modeler |
|
This is all the steps from above. This
is the easiest way to change criteria without recreating
the entire scenario. For example when I decided the slope
requirements were too steep it was an easy change in the
RECLASS module. |
Once we have converted the IDRISI Raster data to be usable in
ArcMap we will do more analysis there.
Now onto the Vector Analysis... |
|
|