Spring 2024 - PHIL 455W D100

Contemporary Issues in Epistemology and Metaphysics (4)

Explanation

Class Number: 7295

Delivery Method: In Person

Overview

  • Course Times + Location:

    Jan 8 – Apr 12, 2024: Fri, 9:30 a.m.–12:20 p.m.
    Burnaby

  • Prerequisites:

    Two 300-division PHIL courses.

Description

CALENDAR DESCRIPTION:

May be repeated for credit. Writing.

COURSE DETAILS:

Selected Topics: Explanation
[Note: this course is to be taught concurrently with PHIL 804 G100.]

This course will consider issues related to explanation, primarily from a philosophy of science perspective and with connections to other topics in metaphysics and to epistemology, including some action explanation. Causal explanation, and the extent to which it requires specific accounts of causation, and the range of explanations that count as causal (from explanations in physics through to precedents around causal responsibility in law), will be considered. Recent developments in causation and causal modeling offer rigorous ways to detect and represent causal relations in many kinds of systems. Do these techniques provide explanations, or merely predictions? How should control be understood in the context of explanation versus prediction? What differentiates scientific explanation from other kinds of explanation?  How do causal explanations differ from or relate to nomological explanations? How can explanations involving probabilistic premises explain individual occurrences: for example, how does a statement like, "95% of events of type X cause events of type Y" suffice in explanations involving claims like "an event of type X happened, and it caused the event of type Y to happen"? We will consider a range of specific issues within debates around explanation, such as question of the explanation of singular versus repeatable explananda, the relationship between explanation and human understanding: what, if any, conditions for intelligibility ought there be on explanations? Finally, depending on student interest, we will consider issues such as methodological holism as a constraint on explanations; the issue of causation with respect to action explanations - are actions explanations simply a subspecies of causal explanation, or do they have distinctive features that cannot be accounted for simply as causal; and pragmatist approaches to explanation. The goal will be to learn enough about causal explanation especially, to be able to apply it in other debates that involve explanations but are not directly about explanation.

COURSE-LEVEL EDUCATIONAL GOALS:

PHIL 421W may be applied towards the Writing Requirement (and the upper division Writing Requirement for Philosophy Majors). This course may be repeated for credit if the topic is different.

Grading

  • • Discussion Questions: 8 total through the term 10%
  • • Precis: 8 total through the term 10%
  • • Term Paper: Detailed outline (including 3-5 minute presentation to class on your topic): 15%; Final Paper: 65% 80%

Materials

REQUIRED READING:

All course materials will be available for download as PDFs through the SFU Library.


REQUIRED READING NOTES:

Your personalized Course Material list, including digital and physical textbooks, are available through the SFU Bookstore website by simply entering your Computing ID at: shop.sfu.ca/course-materials/my-personalized-course-materials.

Department Undergraduate Notes:

Thinking of a Philosophy Major or Minor? The Concentration in Law and Philosophy? The Certificate in Ethics? The Philosophy and Methodology of Science Certificate?
Contact the PHIL Advisor at philcomm@sfu.ca   More details on our website: SFU Philosophy

Registrar Notes:

ACADEMIC INTEGRITY: YOUR WORK, YOUR SUCCESS

SFU’s Academic Integrity website http://www.sfu.ca/students/academicintegrity.html is filled with information on what is meant by academic dishonesty, where you can find resources to help with your studies and the consequences of cheating. Check out the site for more information and videos that help explain the issues in plain English.

Each student is responsible for his or her conduct as it affects the university community. Academic dishonesty, in whatever form, is ultimately destructive of the values of the university. Furthermore, it is unfair and discouraging to the majority of students who pursue their studies honestly. Scholarly integrity is required of all members of the university. http://www.sfu.ca/policies/gazette/student/s10-01.html