Fall 2018 - ENGL 810 G100

Studies in Theory I (4)

Class Number: 4680

Delivery Method: In Person

Overview

  • Course Times + Location:

    Sep 4 – Dec 3, 2018: Thu, 3:30–7:20 p.m.
    Burnaby

  • Instructor:

    Carolyn Lesjak
    clesjak@sfu.ca
    778-782-4333
    Office: AQ6113
    Office Hours: Tu 2:30-4 pm and by appt.

Description

CALENDAR DESCRIPTION:

Provides a detailed and contextual overview of critical debates in twentieth-century literary and cultural theory. The critical lineage explored will vary according to theoretical focus.

COURSE DETAILS:

Theory and the University

It has become popular to declare the end of theory.  But what exactly does it mean to talk about the end or death of theory?  What definition of "theory" informs such a formulation?  Or of "ends" and "death"?  As Vincent Leitch suggests, claims of theory's demise are also signs of anxiety about what's to come:  the so-called passing of theory equally reflects wider fears about the role or place of critical thinking within an increasingly corporatized university.  In short, the status of theory in such debates is inseparable from the status or future of the university.  

This course will begin with the current backlash against theory, reading contemporary turns against it for provisional answers to the question of what it is that is perceived to be at an end and why.  From here we will return to the 1980s in order to trace the development of theory from its heyday to the present.  We will be concerned to situate these developments within their social and historical contexts, and to test them against more recent claims regarding their demise.  Readings will broadly be divided by the major developments leading from New Criticism to poststructuralism and postmodernism.  Of particular interest will be some of the more recent theoretical "schools," including but not limited to new historicism, theories of affect, globalization studies and a variety of critical positions characterized as anti-symptomatic in their approach to questions of representation and interpretation. These readings will be read in tandem with current work on the university that addresses the history of the university and the particular transformations and challenges facing universities today, including recent calls to indigenize the university.  

If Benjamin and Adorno are indeed right about the ripeness of decay for critical thinking, we may, in our so-called moment of theory's passing, be perfectly situated to think about our future anew.

Grading

  • Two oral discussions 20%
  • One short essay (5-6 pages) 30%
  • Final paper 50%

Materials

REQUIRED READING:

Readings will include selections from:

Terry Eagleton, Literary Theory: An Introduction (2nd edition)
Fredric Jameson, The Political Unconscious
Catherine Gallagher and Stephen Greenblatt, Practicing New Historicism
Slavoj Zizek, The Sublime Object of Ideology
Eve Sedgwick, Touching Feeling
Adam Barker and Emma Lowman, Settler: Identity and Colonialism in 21st Century Canada
Thomas King, The Truth about Stories

Additional readings by: John Crowe Ransom, Nietzsche, Adorno and Horkheimer, Derrida, Lacan, Foucault, Stuart Hall, Sedgwick, Ngai, Bill Brown, Marjorie Levinson, David Harvey, Franco Moretti, Marc Bousquet, Stanley Fish, Vincent Leitch, Sara Ahmed, among others.

Graduate Studies Notes:

Important dates and deadlines for graduate students are found here: http://www.sfu.ca/dean-gradstudies/current/important_dates/guidelines.html. The deadline to drop a course with a 100% refund is the end of week 2. The deadline to drop with no notation on your transcript is the end of week 3.

Registrar Notes:

SFU’s Academic Integrity web site http://students.sfu.ca/academicintegrity.html is filled with information on what is meant by academic dishonesty, where you can find resources to help with your studies and the consequences of cheating.  Check out the site for more information and videos that help explain the issues in plain English.

Each student is responsible for his or her conduct as it affects the University community.  Academic dishonesty, in whatever form, is ultimately destructive of the values of the University. Furthermore, it is unfair and discouraging to the majority of students who pursue their studies honestly. Scholarly integrity is required of all members of the University. http://www.sfu.ca/policies/gazette/student/s10-01.html

ACADEMIC INTEGRITY: YOUR WORK, YOUR SUCCESS