|
Data
Collection
Our
data was collected from different sources and in different formats.
Data that was used included ArcView shapefiles of two different
development arrangements, AutoCAD drawings of current and proposed
structures, orthophotos of current SFU structures, campus maps,
source photos for viewshed analysis, and some field work using
a hand held GPS.
• The SFU
Dataset was originally provided by SFU Facilities Management
in AutoCAD .dwg format. This dataset was used in a previous
Geography 452 project, where it was converted into ArcView shapefile
format. The data was given to us in shapefile format, but needed
a lot of work in terms of georeferencing and projection, which
posed a problem when we tried to overlay data from other sources.
Redigitizing some of the polygons was necessary to accommodate
for missing, partially completed, and duplicated polygons. This
dataset included buildings, roads and fields.
• Orthophotos
of the SFU area were also provided by Facilities Management.
• Two different
proposed development arrangements were given to us: the ArcView
shapefile, and in the data above. These proposed developments
were created by the Hotson Bakker Architects and IBI Group.
• AutoCAD
drawings of current buildings, roads, fields, parking lots,
as well as proposed buildings, roads, trees, fields, etc. were
supplied to us by the Ramsey Worden and Hunter Laird architects.
These .dwg files were edited, reprojected, and converted into
ArcView shapefiles used in our final layout.
• Campus maps
were obtained from SFU Campus Security and were used for reference
when redigitizing buildings to maintain accuracy of in terms
of location and identification. Building names were also obtained
from the printed SFU campus map.
• Over 300
digital photographs were collected for the viewshed sites. They
were later stitched together for the Quick Time Virtual Reality
360º display. This data collection required a day of fieldwork.
Group members went to twenty-two selected points around the
campus and collected images with a digital camera. Approximately
12-16 images were acquired at each site to produce a 360º
panoramic view of each location in QTVR. We used a 40-50% overlap
to be certain all images could be stitched together. A handheld
Global Positioning System made by Garmin (model GPS 12) was
used to record positional location for each site. Latitude and
longitude coordinates, along with elevation were recorded electronically
so it could be used in the attribute table of each location.
Although positional accuracy is dithered approximately 10 meters
by the United States government, it offers the GIS user a good
point of reference if other coordinates will be used.
|