- About
- People
- What We Do
- Public Programming
- Initiatives
- When the Map Is Useless
- Cities + Climate
- Moving in a Livable Region
- The Dialogue on Technology Project (DoT)
- Urban Resilient Futures Burnaby
- Action on Climate Team
- Clean Energy Canada
- Hey Neighbour Collective
- New Economy Canada
- Renewable Cities
- Renovate the Public Hearing
- SFU Demshot Challenge
- Mitigating Wildfire Initiative
- Signature Events
- Jack P. Blaney Award for Dialogue
- Award Recipients
- 2024/25: Bringing Justice Home with Judge Abby Abinanti
- 2021/22: Reimagining Social Justice and Racial Equity with adrienne maree brown
- 2019/20: Climate Change and Human Rights with Sheila Watt-Cloutier
- 2017/18: Peace, Pluralism and Gender Equality with Alice Wairimu Nderitu
- 2015/16: Climate Solutions with Tim Flannery
- 2013/14: Reconciliation with Chief Robert Joseph
- 2011/12: Twelve Days of Compassion with Karen Armstrong
- 2009/10: Widening the Circle with Liz Lerman
- 2005: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Right to Health with Mary Robinson
- 2002: Environmental Sustainability with Maurice Strong
- Nomination Details
- History of the Award
- Award Recipients
- Bruce & Lis Welch Community Dialogue
- 2026: Economics for the People: Inside Inequality with Mohsen Javdani
- 2024: AI: Beyond the Hype—Shaping the Future Together with Stephanie Dick and Daniel Barcay
- 2022: Facing the Flames: New and Old Ways of Co-Existing with Fire with Joe Gilchrist and Paul Hessburg
- 2021: All My Relations: Trauma-Informed Engagement with Karine Duhamel
- 2019: Power of Empathy with Kimberly Jackson Davidson
- 2019: Rethinking BC Referendums with John Gastil
- 2017: Strengthening Democratic Engagement with Valerie Lemmie
- 2015-16: THRIVE! Surrey in 2030
- 2014: Citizen Engagement and Political Civility with Dr. Carolyn J. Lukensmeyer
- 2013: Building a Culture of Participation with Dave Meslin
- 2012: Riots and Restorative Justice with Dr. Theo Gavrielides
- 2011: Growing Out of Hunger with Will Allen
- 2010: The Age of Unequals with Richard Wilkinson
- Jack P. Blaney Award for Dialogue
- Dialogue Training
- Consulting Services
- Services
- Workshop and Training Offerings
- Our Projects
- Burnaby Community Assembly
- Centering Equity and Inclusion in an Engagement Framework
- Framework for Diabetes in Canada
- COVID-19 and Public Health: The Faith and Spiritual Leaders Dialogue Series
- Burnaby Business Recovery Task Force
- CleanBC Job Readiness Workshops
- Your Voice. Your Home.
- Perspectives on Reconciliation
- Establishing a Chinese-Canadian Museum
- Citizen Dialogues on Canada’s Energy Future
- Clients and Partners
- Get in Touch
- Knowledge & Practice
- Shared Learning
- News
- Give
News Type
Youth are Assembling!
All too often, youth are assumed to be too inexperienced to participate in real-world decision-making. However, a growing number of civic Assemblies across Canada are challenging this myth by creating meaningful and accessible opportunities for youth to engage with complex public issues and shape decisions alongside their peers and across generations.
Moving beyond traditional approaches to consultation, models of deliberative democracy such as Community Assemblies (also known as Citizens’ Assemblies) foster opportunities for learning, dialogue and collective decision-making. Deliberative processes help address persistent barriers to youth participation by:
Using civic lotteries to ensure proportional representation of youth, as well as other historically under-heard populations
Reducing financial and logistical barriers through honoraria and travel support
Creating structured opportunities to learn from experts and policymakers
Facilitating small-group dialogues that encourage participation and consensus decision-making
The following initiatives highlight deliberative processes that are engaging youth on complex challenges including AI governance, urban planning, climate change, health crises and democratic renewal. Taken together, these projects signal a growing recognition that meaningful youth engagement requires more than high-level consultation. It requires investment in processes that treat young people as partners in shaping our collective future.
New Westminster’s Community Advisory Assembly: Embedding Youth Voice in Local Governance
At the municipal level, the New Westminster Community Advisory Assembly represents a major milestone for participatory democracy in Canada. The Assembly is the first standing deliberative body embedded directly into municipal decision-making, reporting to staff and Council. The Assembly meets monthly throughout the year, developing recommendations on diverse City priorities.
Equally significant is its intergenerational design. All city residents are invited to apply to the Assembly, regardless of their age. Assembly members are selected from the pool of candidates through a civic lottery that aims to mirror the demographic profile of the city. Youth participation is directly encouraged and facilitated by offering an honouraria to youth under 16.
Just under 17% of the 2025-26 cohort of the Assembly are youth aged 19 and under, including participants as young as 13. By bringing youth into sustained policy conversations alongside adults, the Assembly recognizes young people not simply as future stakeholders but as current civic participants. This model reflects a growing understanding that long-term policy decisions benefit from perspectives that span generations.
Gen(Z)AI: Shaping Canada’s AI Future
Another ambitious example is Gen(Z)AI, a national initiative bringing youth together to learn about the implications of AI systems for online harms, and to develop concrete policy recommendations aimed at shaping Canada’s legislative and regulatory approaches to AI.
What makes Gen(Z)AI innovative is its layered engagement approach. First, regional in-person forums bring together a diverse group of lottery-selected youth to learn and deliberate on specific topics including chatbots, data privacy, information integrity and age assurance. Recommendations emerging from these forums are then shared through a national digital platform, allowing youth across Canada to weigh in and refine ideas, broadening participation beyond those selected through the civic lottery.
The project demonstrates how deliberation and digital engagement can work together to scale youth voice while preserving the depth and care of face-to-face dialogue.
Canadian Youth Climate Assembly: From Dialogue to Parliament
The Canadian Youth Climate Assembly marked another historic moment for youth deliberation. As Canada’s first citizens’ assembly focused on climate solutions, it convened youth from across the country to learn, deliberate, and develop policy recommendations addressing one of the defining challenges of their generation.
In September, Assembly participants presented their recommendations to parliamentarians in the Canadian Senate Chamber, demonstrating the growing legitimacy and policy influence of youth deliberative processes. The Assembly model created space for young people to engage deeply with climate complexity while building civic skills and national connections.
University of Victoria: Deliberating Complex Campus Challenges
Meanwhile, at the University of Victoria, deliberative processes are enabling the inclusion of diverse student voices in institutional decision-making. In 2020, the UVic and The Honourable Janet Austin, Lieutenant Governor of British Columbia and Government House, partnered to engage students on how to encourage civility in public discourse and youth engagement in democracy. Following this successful pilot, in 2025 a three-day student Assembly provided recommendations on the university’s approach to reducing harms from toxic drugs.
The use of a civic lottery ensured the equitable representation of students at different levels of degree progress, international students, and students living on and off campus, alongside other identities and lived experiences. These processes also highlight the adaptability of deliberative approaches to sensitive and contested issues, where traditional engagement methods often struggle to create constructive, inclusive conversations.