Research
Last updated:  
Publications
Journal articles
Distinguishing Limited Liability from Moral Hazard in a
Model of Entrepreneurship
reprinted as ch. 5 in T. Beck (ed.)
"Entrepreneurship in Developing Countries", Edward Elgar Publishing,
2009 (with A. Paulson and R. Townsend)
Working Papers and Work in Progress
Dynamic Financial Constraints: Distinguishing Mechanism Design
from Exogenously Incomplete Regimes (with R. Townsend) *revised version
will be available soon*
revise and re-submit requested, Econometrica
We formulate and solve a range of dynamic models of constrained
credit/insurance that allow for moral hazard, limited commitment and
unobservable investment. We compare them to full insurance and
exogenously incomplete financial regimes (autarky, saving only, and
borrowing and lending in a risk-free asset). We develop
computational methods based on mechanism design, linear programming,
and maximum likelihood to estimate, compare, and statistically test
these alternative dynamic models of financial constraints. Our
methods work with both cross-sectional and panel data and allow for
measurement error and unobserved heterogeneity. We estimate the
models using data on Thai households running small businesses. We
find that, overall, the borrowing and saving only regimes provide
the best fit using joint data on consumption, investment, and
income. However, there is evidence that family networks are helpful
in consumption smoothing as in a moral hazard constrained regime.
The full insurance, autarky and limited commitment regimes are
rejected in virtually all estimation runs.
This paper analyzes dynamic risk-sharing contracts between
profit-maximizing insurers and risk-averse agents who face
idiosyncratic income uncertainty and may self-insure through
savings. We study Markov-perfect contracts in which neither
party can commit beyond the current period. We show that the limited
commitment assumption on the insurer's side is only restrictive
when he is endowed with a rate of return advantage and the agent
has sufficiently large initial assets. In such a case, the
consumption profile is distorted relative to the first best. In a
Markov-perfect equilibrium, the agent's asset holdings determine his period
outside option and are thus, an integral part of insurance
contracts unlike the case when the insurer can commit. Whether the parties
can contract on savings decisions or not affects the insurance contract as
long as the insurer makes positive profits.
This paper examines whether financial constraints affect firms' investment
decisions for older (larger) firms. We combine data from the Spanish
Mercantile Registry and the Bank of Spain Credit Registry (CIR) to classify
firms according to their number of banking relations: one, several, or
none. Our empirical strategy combines two approaches based on a common
theoretical model. First, using a standard Euler equation adjustment cost
approach to investment, we find that banked firms in our sample are most
likely to exhibit cash flow sensitivity while unbanked firms are not.
Second, using structural maximum likelihood estimation, we find that
unbanked firms' investment behavior fits best a model of credit subject to
moral hazard with unobserved effort, while single-banked and
multiple-banked firms behave as if operating in a more limited financial
environment, as in an exogenously imposed traditional debt model. Firms in
the unbanked category do not rely on bonds, equity, or formal financial
markets, but rather on other firms in a financial or family-tied group. To
the best of our knowledge, we are among the first to document the
importance of such groups in a European country. We control for reverse
causality by treating bank relationships as endogenous and/or by
appropriate stratifications of the relatively large sample.
We analyze optimal contract forms and optimal matching patterns in a
double-sided moral hazard model of sharecropping similar to Eswaran and
Kotwal (1985). We show that once we allow for endogenous matching the
presence of moral hazard can reverse the optimal matching pattern relative
to the first best, and that even if sharecropping is optimal for an
exogenously given pair of types, it may not be observed in equilibrium with
endogenous matching. This suggests that empirical studies on agency costs
in sharecropping may underestimate their extent if only focusing on the
intensive margin and ignoring the extensive margin.
We revisit the role of limited commitment in a dynamic risk-sharing setting
with private information. We show that a Markov-perfect equilibrium, in
which agent and insurer cannot commit beyond the current period, and an
innitely-long contract to which only the insurer can commit, implement
identical consumption, effort and welfare outcomes. Unlike contracts with
full commitment by the insurer, Markov-perfect contracts feature non-trivial
and determinate asset dynamics. Numerically, we show that Markov-perfect
contracts provide sizable insurance, especially at low asset levels, and
are able to explain a significant part of wealth inequality beyond what can
be explained by self-insurance. The welfare gains from resolving the
commitment friction are larger than those from resolving the moral
hazard problem at low asset levels, while the opposite holds for
high asset levels.
Distinguishing Across Models of International Capital Flows (with M.
Wright, in progress)
A Friend in Need is a Friend Indeed? Theory and Evidence on the
(Dis)Advantages of Family Loans
(with A. Kessler and I. Livshits, in progress)
Economics of Crime Networks
(with S. Easton, in progress)
Social Insurance and Status
(with B. Xia, in progress)
Development Dynamics with Credit Rationing and Occupational
Choice (2008)
Altruism in the Principal-Agent Model: The Samaritan's Dilemma Revisited
(with S. Ghosh, 2008)
This paper provides a step-by-step hands-on introduction to the techniques
used in setting up and solving moral hazard programs with lotteries using
Matlab. It uses a linear programming approach due to its relative simplicity
and the high reliability of the available optimization algorithms.
Home