- About
- Events
- Inquiry Support
- Workshops & Programs
- SoTL 101: Introduction to SoTL and Teaching + Learning Inquiry
- SoTL 102: Formulating an Inquiry Project
- SoTL Thoughts
- Coffee + Conversation
- Tools for Inquiry: Conducting Inquiry Using CES
- Amundsen Fellowship Program
- Decolonial Teaching + Learning Seminar Series
- Decolonizing and Indigenizing Curricula
- Disrupting Colonialism through Teaching Program
- Exploring Well-being in Learning Environments: An Integrated Seminar Series + Grants Program
- Inquiring into Your Multilingual Classroom: An Integrated Seminar Series + Grants Program
- New Ways of Teaching, New Ways of Learning: Supporting Learning in Online Environments
- Open Education Grant Pilot Program
- Teaching and Learning Development Grant Program
- Project Archive
- Amundsen Fellowship Program
- Disrupting Colonialism through Teaching Program
- Exploring Well-being in Learning Environments Program
- Inquiring into Your Multilingual Classroom Projects
- New Ways of Teaching, New Ways of Learning
- Teaching and Learning Development Grant Program
- Scholarship of Teaching + Learning Projects
- Conferences & Calls for Proposals
- Teaching with AI: May 19, 2026 [May 19-28, 2026]
- ETUG Spring 2026 Workshop: Collaboration, Co-creation, and Creativity in EdTech [May 28-29, 2026]
- SFU Library: Scholarly Digital Project Program [Deadline: June 1, 2026]
- Teaching with AI: June 1, 2026 [June 01-10, 2026]
- EDUCAUSE Symposium: New Approaches to Assessment Design for AI-Enabled Learning [June 9 and 11, 2026]
- FLO Workshop: GenAI and the Indigenous 5Rs Framework [June 16, 2026]
- Cfp: 2026 Global Students as Partners Roundtable [Deadline: June 29, 2026]
- Graduate Students/Post-docs Teaching in Higher Education Conference [August 07, 2026]
- 2026 DPI Conference [August 18-20, 2026]
- 2026 Global Students as Partners Roundtable [October 01-02, 2026]
- 2026 SoTL Symposium Conference [October 22-24, 2026]
- For Research Personnel
- News + Stories
- AI as learning coach: project explores ChatGPT integration beyond plagiarism concerns
- Investigating the motivations and perceptions of undergraduate students using AI for assignments
- Faculty teaching confidence soars through peer observation program
- Research proves role plays work: evidence-based approach transforms history and labour studies teaching
- Welcome Kaitlyn Watson!
- Authentic learning transforms large epidemiology course: students find personal meaning in public health research
- Developing AI-resistant teaching through story-centered approach
Group Exams and EAL Student Performance
Grant program: Teaching and Learning Development Grant (TLDG)
Grant recipient: Marion Caldecott, Department of Linguistics
Project team: Esma Emmioglu, post-doctoral research assistant and Kayleigh MacMillan, research assistant
Timeframe: January 2013 to June 2013
Funding: $4,800
Course addressed: LING 330 – Phonetics
Poster presentation: View a poster (PDF) describing this project from the 2013 Symposium on Teaching and Learning.
Description: This project examines the effect of group exams on student performance in LING 330. It also investigates if there is a difference between EAL (English as an Additional Language) and non-EAL students’ performances and opinions about the group exams at the end of the semester.
The project will proceed in several stages. In the first class, a student profile questionnaire will ask students about their course expectations and allow students to self-identify as EAL. This questionnaire also includes two opinion questions about student opinions toward group exams. Second, I will design the quizzes, midterm and exam questions such that questions that students struggled with on quizzes are repeated (though not identical) on the midterms and compare the number of correct responses as the semester progresses. Third, a survey assessing students’ opinions about the group exams will be administered at the end of the semester. This survey measures students’ opinions with regard to the following aspects: enjoyment, anxiety, feedback, preparedness, reasoning, and engagement.
Results will be analyzed to see i) if students’ performance improved over the semester, ii) how students’ opinions about group exams changed, and iii) if there was a difference between EAL and non-EAL students.
Evidence obtained from this project will help to improve the design of the LING courses. The project will provide a greater understanding of student experiences of taking group exams. In addition, given the large percentage of EAL students at SFU and other provincial post secondary institutions, successful strategies for supporting EAL students in their learning may be useful to a range of departments. Linguistics straddles the arts-science divide, so results of this research would also be applicable to both Arts and Science streams..
Questions addressed:
- Does student performance on a subset of questions improve over the course of the semester?
- Is there a difference in performance between EAL and non-EAL students?
- What were the student opinions about group exams (in terms of enjoyment and anxiety, feedback, preparedness, reasoning, and engagement) at the end of the semester?
- Was there a difference between EAL and non-EAL students in ‘opinions about group exams’ at the end of the semester?
- Which aspect of group exams did students find most helpful? Which hypothesized aspect of learning did they support?
Knowledge sharing: Findings of the study will be shared with colleagues at a departmental colloquium.
Caldecott, M. (2013, June). Do group exams support EAL student learning? Paper presented at the Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (STLHE) Annual Conference, Sydney, NS.
Caldecott, M. (2013, May). Do group exams support EAL student learning? Poster session presented at the Symposium on Teaching and Learning: Embracing Change @SFU, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC.