- About
- Events
- Inquiry Support
- Workshops & Programs
- SoTL 101: Introduction to SoTL and Teaching + Learning Inquiry
- SoTL 102: Formulating an Inquiry Project
- SoTL Thoughts
- Coffee + Conversation
- Tools for Inquiry: Conducting Inquiry Using CES
- Amundsen Fellowship Program
- Decolonial Teaching + Learning Seminar Series
- Decolonizing and Indigenizing Curricula
- Disrupting Colonialism through Teaching Program
- Exploring Well-being in Learning Environments: An Integrated Seminar Series + Grants Program
- Inquiring into Your Multilingual Classroom: An Integrated Seminar Series + Grants Program
- New Ways of Teaching, New Ways of Learning: Supporting Learning in Online Environments
- Open Education Grant Pilot Program
- Teaching and Learning Development Grant Program
- Project Archive
- Amundsen Fellowship Program
- Disrupting Colonialism through Teaching Program
- Exploring Well-being in Learning Environments Program
- Inquiring into Your Multilingual Classroom Projects
- New Ways of Teaching, New Ways of Learning
- Teaching and Learning Development Grant Program
- Scholarship of Teaching + Learning Projects
- Conferences & Calls for Proposals
- EDUCAUSE Symposium: New Approaches to Assessment Design for AI-Enabled Learning [June 9 and 11, 2026]
- FLO Workshop: GenAI and the Indigenous 5Rs Framework [June 16, 2026]
- Cfp: 2026 Global Students as Partners Roundtable [Deadline: June 29, 2026]
- Graduate Students/Post-docs Teaching in Higher Education Conference [August 07, 2026]
- 2026 DPI Conference [August 18-20, 2026]
- 2026 Global Students as Partners Roundtable [October 01-02, 2026]
- 2026 SoTL Symposium Conference [October 22-24, 2026]
- For Research Personnel
- News + Stories
- AI as learning coach: project explores ChatGPT integration beyond plagiarism concerns
- Investigating the motivations and perceptions of undergraduate students using AI for assignments
- Faculty teaching confidence soars through peer observation program
- Research proves role plays work: evidence-based approach transforms history and labour studies teaching
- Welcome Kaitlyn Watson!
- Authentic learning transforms large epidemiology course: students find personal meaning in public health research
- Developing AI-resistant teaching through story-centered approach
- Life-changing plant course reveals how to help students see the green world around them
- Strategic repetition transforms mobile computing education: students master challenging topics through distributed practice
Communications Methods Review
Grant program: Teaching and Learning Development Grant (TLDG)
Grant recipients: Katherine Reilly and Daniel Ahadi, School of Communication
Project team: Chris Jeschelnik, Frederik Lesage, Jan Marontate, and David Murphy School of Communication, and Ayaka Yoshimizu, research assistant
Timeframe: March 2016 to October 2016
Funding: $5,000
Courses addressed:
- CMNS 260 – Empirical Communication Research Methods (Q designation)
- CMNS 261 – Documentary Research in Communication (also offered as CODE course)
- CMNS 262 – Qualitative Communication Research Methods
Final report: View Katherine Reilly's short verion final report (PDF) and long version final report (PDF)
Description: The 200-level methods curriculum in the School of Communication needs enhancement. Recent innovations have been introduced within specific courses. However, the Undergraduate Studies Committee (USC) is now encouraging a general review of methods instruction so that we can better allocate topics among methods courses, and better integrate these courses into the wider CMNS curriculum. In addition, methods instruction in the School is plagued with significant enrolment bottlenecks that need to be resolved. Overall, we would like to enhance coordination and timing of the methodology courses to better meet student needs, and better prepare them for upper year courses, graduate education and their working lives.
Goals of the project:
- Establish channels of communication to support ongoing exchange between methods instructors in the School.
- Produce evidence to support informed changes to the School’s 200-level methods curriculum.
- Develop a curriculum plan that a) incorporates existing teaching materials thus minimizing the need for extensive curricular overhaul by any one individual, and b) balances the need for teaching coordination with the need for teaching autonomy.
- Advance a proposal for calendar revision.
- Produce a School-level learning outcome statement around methods, as well as general statements of learning outcomes for 200-level methods instruction.
Knowledge sharing: Our report will be circulated to School colleagues for comment, both in written form, and through discussions at School meetings. In addition, the report will be published on the TLDG website as a resource for other SFU faculty who are considering similar review of methods teaching.